Re: Exec startet keine PHP/SH-Dateien

2006-11-08 Thread James Blond
Hallo! Ich würde mal auf Berechtigungsprobleme tippen. Eventuell darf der User unter dem der Indianer läuft nicht auf die php zugreifen. Bei den modernen Linux/Unix systemen gibt es oft automatische Updates. Schau mal nach in welcher Gruppe sich die php executale befindet. Gruß Mario On

AW: Exec startet keine PHP/SH-Dateien

2006-11-08 Thread Mario Batz
Selbst wenn die PHP-Datei chmod 777 hat? Oder meinst du die PHP-Binary selbst? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: James Blond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 09:45 An: users-de@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: Exec startet keine PHP/SH-Dateien Hallo! Ich würde

Re: Exec startet keine PHP/SH-Dateien

2006-11-08 Thread Rainer Sokoll
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:56:32AM +0100, Mario Batz wrote: Selbst wenn die PHP-Datei chmod 777 hat? Du rufste es doch mit exec(php auswertung.php 123 ) auf - da brauchts keine Ausführungsrechte für auswertung.php. Nur Leserechte. Oder meinst du die PHP-Binary selbst? Exakt. Und es muß

AW: Exec startet keine PHP/SH-Dateien

2006-11-08 Thread Mario Batz
So, hab den Fehler gefunden ... Wenn ich bei exec(php auswertung.php 123 ) bei php den Pfad mit angebe, dann klappts. LOL Also bei exec(/usr/local/bin/php auswertung.php 123 ) klappts auch mit exec(). So wie es aussieht, hat jemand an den Pfaden gedreht und somit wird php nicht gefunden. Aber

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] config apache account

2006-11-08 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Tim Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:50 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] config apache account Folks, am newie to apache linux . google and read apache docu but don't find answer. thx in

[EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible to invalidate the cache?

2006-11-08 Thread cristi
Hello all I have set up as a caching reverse proxy. Is there any way to invalidate the cache in order to force apache to make the requests to the origin server ? thx cristi - The official User-To-User support forum of the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hanging processes when using worker MPM

2006-11-08 Thread Eirik Øverby
Hello all, I recently had to switch from prefork to worker on a large production system, in order to optimize performance and limit memory usage under high load. In principle, it is working fine, however I see that over time some processes are hanging even though they should have been

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using Edge Side Includes (ESI) with Apache

2006-11-08 Thread thomas Armstrong
Hi Nick. Thank you very much for your answer. So what's the way to implement ESI-Akanai on my webserver? By using PHP headers? I've got no idea :( Regards, --T On 11/7/06, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 18:25:34 +0100 thomas Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is it possible to invalidate the cache?

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, cristi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all I have set up as a caching reverse proxy. Is there any way to invalidate the cache in order to force apache to make the requests to the origin server ? Sure. See the HTTP spec for the details of what the client can request as far as

[EMAIL PROTECTED] client side certificates authentication in virtual hosts

2006-11-08 Thread Benjamin Cuthbert
All Can you run two SSL virtual host URLS on the same IP address and have one running with no client certificate authentication and one running without client authentication. I have tried it and the options SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 1 But when this is enabled on one of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] client side certificates authentication in virtual hosts

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, Benjamin Cuthbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All Can you run two SSL virtual host URLS on the same IP address and have one running with no client certificate authentication and one running without client authentication. I have tried it and the options SSLVerifyClient

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] client side certificates authentication in virtual hosts

2006-11-08 Thread Serge Dubrouski
On 11/8/06, Benjamin Cuthbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All Can you run two SSL virtual host URLS on the same IP address and have one running with no client certificate authentication and one running without It's possible if having one VirtualHost complaining about wrong Server Certificate is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS

2006-11-08 Thread Leonardo Neves
Hi, My apache server this receiving flooding from solicitations HTTP of diverse places, as shown in log below (access_log). How to block this? My environment is mandriva 2007.0, kernel 2.6.17-5mdv packages: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep apache apache-conf-2.2.3-3mdv2007.0

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, Leonardo Neves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My apache server this receiving flooding from solicitations HTTP of diverse places, as shown in log below (access_log). How to block this? My environment is mandriva 2007.0, kernel 2.6.17-5mdv packages: 207.44.158.30 - -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'copy' : return code '0x1'

2006-11-08 Thread Richard de Vries
Hey everyone, Last week I wrote about some problems I'd been having with trying to get Apache to compile on Windows. I received a lot of great feedback and have narrowed the problem down to Visual Studio Express. I upgraded to Visual Studio Professional and all previous compilation issues have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] client side certificates authentication in virtual hosts

2006-11-08 Thread Benjamin Cuthbert
They does not sound like such a good idea, what if i bound the new virtual host to a new IP address would i then be able to run both in different modes ? Regards Ben Cuthbert Deutsche Bank AG Corporate Investment Bank GTO : TISO / Arch Global Finance / Prime Services PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS

2006-11-08 Thread Leonardo Neves
Thanks for reply. I removed mod_proxy and the problem continued. Some another ideia? Leo. 2006/11/8, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 11/8/06, Leonardo Neves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My apache server this receiving flooding from solicitations HTTP of diverse places, as shown in log

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, Leonardo Neves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for reply. I removed mod_proxy and the problem continued. Some another ideia? The requests aren't going to instantly stop. You've been running an open proxy server that is probably being exploited by an army of compromised drone

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.0.59 Binary with /htdocs for red hat ent lnx 4

2006-11-08 Thread Tim Liu
Folks,Can somebody share the link for Apache 2.0.59 Binary with /htdocs for red hat ent lnx 4? The link in the following doesn't have documents and apache can't start. thx a lot http://mirrors.isc.org/pub/apache/httpd/binaries/rpm/i386/thx Tim

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 00:48:39 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just to put my money where my mouth is, I have implemented a (stupid) prototype that does: If no known charset is native to libxml2 detected , a recompiled version of mod_proxy_html now uses iconv (eventually via

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through whether to incorporate

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_charset_light and mod_proxy_html (Solved!)

2006-11-08 Thread mickg
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:56:28 -0500 mickg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you want the full working code once I clean up the memory problem? It is, after all, GPL, so it would be in good spirit for me to release the modified source. :) Yes please. I haven't thought through

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.3 build issue

2006-11-08 Thread Gary D. Margiotta
... The compile worked fine the first time on the same VM image, but now on subsequent builds can't seem to get past this part. I'm looking for any cruft in the system which may have been left over from any previous compile/install, but no success yet. Can you try passing --with-included-apr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best way of forwarding traffice from Apache 1.3 to 2.0

2006-11-08 Thread Joseph Cheng
thx all for the suggestions..this one worked RewriteEngine on RewriteRule ^/(.+) /temporary.html On 11/8/06, Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Joseph Cheng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:31 PM To:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Restarting Apache

2006-11-08 Thread Lamotkin
Sean Conner writes: It was thus said that the Great Jonathan Horne once stated: On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a newbie to Apache, actually, a dummy (: Can someone please explain to me, why am I allowed to restart Apache with httpd -k {restart|graceful}

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite problem (adding www.)

2006-11-08 Thread Geoff Soper
Hi, I use the following piece of code in an .htaccess file at /var/www/vhosts/domain.com/httpdocs/.htaccess to get traffic from http://domain.com onto http://www.domain.com which works perfectly: RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Domain OR Password Protection???

2006-11-08 Thread Liz Kim
Could I have a domain protection and a password protection on a directory with Apache?BUT!! NOT require both but just one?Details..I have a directory which is domain protected.When a user from an unapporved domain tried to access the directory he will recieve a 403 error. At this exact moment -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Domain OR Password Protection???

2006-11-08 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/8/06, Liz Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could I have a domain protection and a password protection on a directory with Apache? BUT!! NOT require both but just one? Details.. I have a directory which is domain protected. When a user from an unapporved domain tried to access the directory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Trouble building mod_auth_ldap with Mozilla LDAP C SDK 6.0, Apache 2.0.59 on ia64

2006-11-08 Thread Mark Lavi
Hello everyone: This is my first time posting here, but I've been building Apache for years now since early 1.3.x and I've benefited from the archives previously. I've scanned the FAQ, recent bugs, and mailing list archives. I've also Google'd for solutions to my issue, but I'm not having

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS

2006-11-08 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:51 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DDOS On 11/8/06, Leonardo Neves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for reply. I