RE: Very slow column validation

2016-01-13 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
evel, just to see if Isis is busy or not. On 13 January 2016 at 01:01, Branham, Jeremy [HR] < jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com> wrote: > The delay does not go away when validation is turned off. > It seems the in memory metamodel validation occurs when the object is > accessed, regardle

Very slow column validation

2016-01-12 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
I'm experiencing some latency, which I think is occurring due to a large number of tables in my DB. The first domain object that is loaded on the home page loads very quick. But the second loads very slow. I notice there is a difference in the column validation query - The first query has a

RE: Very slow column validation

2016-01-12 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
9, Branham, Jeremy [HR] < jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com> wrote: > I'm experiencing some latency, which I think is occurring due to a > large number of tables in my DB. > The first domain object that is loaded on the home page loads very quick. > But the second loads very slow. > &

RE: Objects whose structure is not known a priori

2015-04-14 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
to provide a way for the users to define the properties of a permit. These properties then need to be captured during the permit application and issuance process. This is the background of the use case. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 13, 2015, at 1:29 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran

Re: Objects whose structure is not known a priori

2015-04-12 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
I really do not want to use ElasticSearch or Solr. James Agada Chief Technology Officer [cid:03079D33-D6EF-43C4-BC68-409961ED49D7][cid:0A85BA30-39DD-4C9D-AF4D-6ECD6761CB96] On Apr 12, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.commailto:jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: Hi

RE: Apache Isis 1.9.0 + DN 4.0.4

2015-03-19 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
the better). Cheers Dan On 19 March 2015 at 00:56, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: I have merged the latest Apache Isis master with my fork [1] including DataNucleus 4.0.4 There are some adjustments I can revert to make a pull request easier, but should be ready

RE: Workflow

2015-01-06 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
] http://isis.apache.org/reference/services/bookmark-service.html [2] http://isis.apache.org/reference/non-ui/background-command-execution.html [3] https://github.com/danhaywood/isis-module-scheduler On 5 January 2015 at 19:43, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: Is anyone

RE: Workflow

2015-01-06 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
, writing Activiti-queries, creating view models). I'm new to Activiti (or other workflow components) and my progress isn't that much yet, but I'll let you know if anything interesting pops up. Erik [1] http://activiti.org/ On 01/05/2015 08:43 PM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] wrote: Is anyone using

Workflow

2015-01-05 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Is anyone using a workflow component in their Isis app? JBPM? Or do you represent workflow as behaviors in the domain? What has your experience been? Thanks! Jeremy D. Branham Technology Architect This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information

RE: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings

2015-01-03 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Martin Grigorov [mailto:mgrigo...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 6:42 AM To: users Subject: Re: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings Hi Jeremy, On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: So

RE: Isis + Neo4j 2.1.6

2015-01-03 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
the integration by accident in the future. 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-789 2. https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests/ Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR

RE: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...

2015-01-03 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
This is a good compromise IMHO. Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk] Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 7:27 AM To: users Cc: d...@isis.apache.org Subject: Re: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a

Isis + Neo4j 2.1.6

2015-01-02 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
If you are interested in running Isis with Neo4j - Have a look at this branch that contains a sample application [neoapp] based on the 'simpleapp' example. https://github.com/jdbranham/isis/tree/DN_404 And a small extension that enables the embedded Neo4j services - including the Neo4j

IntelliJ Templates + Apache Isis

2015-01-02 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
I've added a few code templates for IntelliJ IDEA that help me build domain objects and services rapidly. Available here - https://github.com/Sprint/ide-templates It only takes me a few seconds now to scaffold new classes and properties. Dan/Martin - Thanks for turning me on to IDEA. I'm

RE: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings

2015-01-01 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
] Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 3:24 PM To: users@isis.apache.org Subject: RE: Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings It looks like

Removing the ObjectAdapter mappings

2015-01-01 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Suppose I wanted to remove the mapping between the pojo - ObjectAdapter and from the OID - ObjectAdapter, and just create/discard the ObjectAdapters when needed. What would be the high level steps to accomplish this? Would the FrameworkSynchronizer go away completely? It would probably be

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
-associates.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:27 AM To: users Subject: Re: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus On 31 December 2014 at 02:36, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: I'm loving IDEA. Debugging is better, and the Maven integration works great. Glad I can

RE: Simplifying annotation names

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
I like the idea of @DomainEntity because it seems more descriptive, but I guess that doesn’t fit well for ViewModels, hence the need for the @ViewModel. I also like prefixing the other annotations with 'Domain'. Is this the set that would be considered given option 'A' and the related

RE: Simplifying annotation names

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Regards Mike Burton (Sent from my iPhone) On 31 Dec 2014, at 12:52, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: I like the idea of @DomainEntity because it seems more descriptive, but I guess that doesn’t fit well for ViewModels, hence the need for the @ViewModel. I also like

RE: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
What would it look like with @Model? Giving more specificity than ‘Object’ but opening the interpretation to Entities and ViewModels. Or am I overlooking something? [I am new to Isis] (fyi - there is a name clash with Model in Spring-MVC) Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET From: Jeroen van der

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
realized what I had done. Doh! Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 6:04 AM To: users@isis.apache.org Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus I've now added another facet to remove the method names

RE: ISIS-970 ... (new annotations) please review if you get a chance...

2014-12-31 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
. com.mycompany.myapp.pd.*com.mycompany.myapp.ui.* David. On Thursday, 1 January 2015 3:24 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: What would it look like with @Model? Giving more specificity than ‘Object’ but opening the interpretation to Entities and ViewModels. Or am

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-30 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
with latest datanucleus Hi, On Dec 30, 2014 5:39 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote: There ended up being a lot of refactoring to swap PersistenceCapable for Persistable throughout. Currently trying to understand this - java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: mismatch

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-29 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Forgot to mention - I updated the 'JDOStateManagerForIsis' to use Persistable instead of PersistanceCapable. public class JDOStateManagerForIsis extends ReferentialStateManagerImpl { ... } Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Monday

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-29 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:31 PM To: users@isis.apache.org Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus Forgot to mention - I updated the 'JDOStateManagerForIsis' to use Persistable instead of PersistanceCapable. public class JDOStateManagerForIsis

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-29 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
are using. Eclipse, IDEA, other? Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:47 PM To: users@isis.apache.org Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus I've added the factories

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-24 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
4.0, that's certainly the intention, and is a prerequisite for us to support Java8. Given that Java7 support finishes in April 2015, it's clearly something that we need to do be tackling quite soon. Thx Dan On 24 December 2014 at 05:24, Branham, Jeremy [HR] jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote

RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus

2014-12-23 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
The line numbers didn't match because a different version of the class was being loaded. I added a null check that solved the issue, but the code running hadn't picked up the change yet. Jeremy D. Branham Tel: **DOTNET -Original Message- From: Branham, Jeremy [HR] Sent: Tuesday

How would I use neo4j with Apache Isis?

2014-12-20 Thread Branham, Jeremy [HR]
I am attempting to use neo4j as a backing store for Apache Isis but it looks like some development may be needed. If I add the datanucleus-neo4j dependency, it appears the neo4j JDO connection is initializing but Apache Isis is expecting a different type of StoreManager. This is the exception I