4j, that I realized what I had done.
Doh!
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 6:04 AM
To: users@isis.apache.org
Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
I've now added another facet to re
table creation strategy has changed in DN 4.
Should there be an explicit table creation added somewhere in the fixture
setups?
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:27 AM
T
eUpdate(Unknown Source)
> at
> org.datanucleus.store.rdbms.datasource.dbcp.DelegatingStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingStatement.java:210)
> at
> org.datanucleus.store.rdbms.datasource.dbcp.DelegatingStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingStatement.java:210)
> at
> org.apache.isi
.datanucleus.store.rdbms.datasource.dbcp.DelegatingStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingStatement.java:210)
at
org.apache.isis.objectstore.jdo.datanucleus.service.support.IsisJdoSupportImpl.executeUpdate(IsisJdoSupportImpl.java:142)
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, De
ixtureScript.run(FixtureScript.java:504)
> at
> org.apache.isis.applib.fixturescripts.FixtureScripts.runFixtureScript(FixtureScripts.java:266)
> at
> fixture.todo.ToDoItemsFixturesService.runFixtureScript(ToDoItemsFixturesService.java:58)
> at
> integration.tests.ToDoItem
you can attach the debugger
2) run the failing test directly from the IDE
Thanks for helping us with this!
Have fun!
>
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:47 PM
> To: u
s with this!
Have fun!
>
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:47 PM
> To: users@isis.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
>
>
>
x27;m curious what other folks are using. Eclipse, IDEA,
other?
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 4:47 PM
To: users@isis.apache.org
Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
I
DEBUG] CREATE TABLE
"ToDoItemDependencies"
(
"dependingId" BIGINT NOT NULL,
"dependentId" BIGINT NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT "ToDoItemDependencies_PK" PRIMARY KEY
("dependingId","dependentId")
)
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel:
nt: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:26 PM
To: users@isis.apache.org
Subject: RE: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
Thanks, that has got me started.
For now I am just working with the RDMS capable statemanager, and will focus on
the Neo4j compatibility later.
I&#x
}
Is there still something wrong with the method filtering? Or is this a
different issue?
Jeremy D. Branham
Tel: **DOTNET
-Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 11:33 AM
To: users
Subject: Re: Working on
SO -
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27692754/is-referentialjdostatemanager-not-used-in-datanucleus-4-x
>
>
>
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -Original
ge-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 1:42 AM
To: users
Subject: Re: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
With Isis we have:
org.apache.isis.core.metamodel.facets.object.ignore.jdo.RemoveJdoEnhancementTypesFacetFactory
that ensures that
tsupport.IsisSystemForTest.setUpSystem(IsisSystemForTest.java:314)
>
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 12:05 PM
> To: users
> Subject:
--Original Message-
From: Dan Haywood [mailto:d...@haywood-associates.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 12:05 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
Hi Jeremy,
sorry, it's not clear to me if you had an issue but then resolved it, or
whether there is s
heck that solved the issue, but the code running hadn't
> picked up the change yet.
>
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:04 PM
> To: users@isis.apache.org
> Su
gt;
>
> Jeremy D. Branham
> Tel: **DOTNET
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Branham, Jeremy [HR]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:04 PM
> To: users@isis.apache.org
> Subject: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
>
> Sorry for the massive stack trac
t: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:04 PM
To: users@isis.apache.org
Subject: Working on a branch with latest datanucleus
Sorry for the massive stack trace, but I was looking for some pointers on what
might be happing here.
I'm having a bit of difficulty debugging because the line numbers reported
Sorry for the massive stack trace, but I was looking for some pointers on what
might be happing here.
I'm having a bit of difficulty debugging because the line numbers reported
don't seem to match the source files, and even when stepping through the code.
[maybe something wrong in my dev env]
I
19 matches
Mail list logo
