Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

;-) Nothing implied from me and as I thought re Linux/Dev. Thanks (devs) for the work. On 1 Feb 2017 19:33, "A. Soroka" wrote: > No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so > many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to >

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

No, I should say that that exclusion is just a nod to the fact that so many of the Jena devs use Linux that it's just much less of an issue to find Linux testers. Windows seems to be generally the hardest platform to get results for. I certainly didn't intend any more than that, but I copied

Re: Release vote : 3.2.0

Hi. Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and Centos 7. If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-) On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" wrote: >

Release vote : 3.2.0

Hello, Jena-folks! Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0. Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an issue, you can bet I

Facing problems during creating JsonLd + Hydra based Generic Client API in java using Apache-Jena?. Is there any projects exists for reference?

Here is my detailed question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/41975128/creating-jsonld-hydra-based-generic-client-api-in-java-is-there-any-projects Please give suggestion to above question and more clarity about proper way to implement it . -- *Disclaimer:* * "This message is intended