Hi. Under checking Windows and Mac OS's are listed but not Linux. Is Jena assumed to pass? I'mean running Jena 3.2 snapshot on Ubuntu 16.04 and Centos 7.
If you haven't broken anything in the snapshot then I vote release. ;-) On 1 Feb 2017 16:09, "A. Soroka" <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: > Hello, Jena-folks! > > Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0. > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. Three +1's > from PMC members permit a release, but everyone is not just welcome but > _needed_ to do really good full testing. If a non-committer turns up an > issue, you can bet I will investigate fast. > > This is a distribution of Jena and also of Fuseki 1 and 2. > > Versions being released include: Jena @ 3.2.0 (RDF libraries, database > gear, and utilities), Fuseki 1 @ 1.5.0 and Fuseki 2 @ 2.5.0 (SPARQL > servers). > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1016/ > > Proposed distributions: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/binaries/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > Git tag: > jena-3.2.0-rc1 > 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;a=commit;h= > 4bdc528c788681b90acf341de0989ca7686bae8c > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to the end of > > Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC > > Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind! > > ajs6f (A. Soroka) > > > Checking needed: > > • Does everything work on MS Windows? > • Does everything work on OS X? > • Is the GPG signature okay? > • Is there a source archive? > • Can the source archive really be built? > • Is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact (both source > and binary artifacts)? > • Does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > • Does the tag in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > > > > >
