Re: reasoner performance

Dear friends, given that my larger experience is with OWL; swrl, and swqrl, that was my first option, my challenge is to get the job done, the approach to follow now is not the most important, so I am going to write the queries in sparql, and execute them in my workflow, if I find any constrain

Looking for alternate API for com.hp.hpl.jena.db.IDBConnection.containsModel

Hi All, We are upgrading from jena 2 to jena 3. We have the following method in com.hp.hpl.jena.db.IDBConnection in jena 2: containsModel boolean containsModel(String name)

Re: reasoner performance

At a high level, it seems just as easy (if not a good bit easier) to do this in SPARQL (which can be understood as supporting some simple inferencing, if you like to think of it that way). Is it absolutely necessary to do this using inferencing? Are you trying to use that because your recent

Missed inference in Jena Fuseki

Hello, I'm using Jena Fuseki 3.13.1 (with OWLFBRuleReasoner), and I have asserted (uploaded) the following triples: @prefix rdfs: . @prefix owl: . @prefix f: . f:Bob f:hasWife f:Alice . f:Bob

Re: reasoner performance

Dear friends, Thanks so much for your quick answer, At first about our use case, I estimate that we will be working with around 100 millions triples at the beginning, thus according to the answer of Dave, this size should be manageable by Jena, or I am wrong?, of course surely we will grow