I'm confused. Did you change your operating system since you used it
last time? As it was working before, was it MacOS or Linux and now
you're using Windows?
On 12.04.21 19:24, Zlatareva, Neli (Computer Science) wrote:
Hi Lorenz, thank you for the quick response.
bin/arq --help does not work (
On 12/04/2021 09:33, Siddharth Trikha wrote:
Or create a second general dataset, then get the named graph objects
(they are reference) and put it in this dataset and query that.
(this is what using several FROM NAMED does anyway)
If I understand it correctly the following example is what
On 12/04/2021 15:50, Rob Vesse wrote:
Han
The general approach to this kind of complex sign on scenario would be to use
an external authentication service/protocol e.g. OAuth2/Open ID Connect which
handles the multi-factor authentication and then configure your applications
authentication
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 7:24 PM Zlatareva, Neli (Computer Science)
wrote:
>
> Hi Lorenz, thank you for the quick response.
> bin/arq --help does not work (from ...\apache-jena-4.0.0 directory).
> The error is
> 'bin' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> operable program or batch
Hi Lorenz, thank you for the quick response.
bin/arq --help does not work (from ...\apache-jena-4.0.0 directory).
The error is
'bin' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
I tried to run
arg --help from the bin directory and it gives me the same error
Han
The general approach to this kind of complex sign on scenario would be to use
an external authentication service/protocol e.g. OAuth2/Open ID Connect which
handles the multi-factor authentication and then configure your applications
authentication layer to just validate the Json Web Tokens
Hi there,
I'm looking for a solution to have multifactor authentication (MFA) in Fuseki.
I'm pretty sure this lies outside of the scope of Apache Jena, but perhaps
Fuseki's UI should be able to be compatible with it at some point in the future.
I have found a potential solution to get multifact
On 12/04/2021 11:07, Rob Vesse wrote:
Yes such a feature would be a valuable contribution. It's certainly something
that other users have asked for.
Your main issue is probably going to be verifying that there aren't open
transactions against the old versions of the data, Andy might have s
Hi Brandon,
There are a number of possible steps after a compaction - delete,
archive, compress-archive-delete.
This sounds like a natural thing to have but at the same time I'm a bit
wary of adding features one at a time because a feature is a commitment
to maintain and some other concern m
Yes such a feature would be a valuable contribution. It's certainly something
that other users have asked for.
Your main issue is probably going to be verifying that there aren't open
transactions against the old versions of the data, Andy might have some
ideas/pointers to whether the internal
>
> Or create a second general dataset, then get the named graph objects
> (they are reference) and put it in this dataset and query that.
>
> (this is what using several FROM NAMED does anyway)
>
If I understand it correctly the following example is what you suggested:
Dataset createGeneral = Da
Hi,
I have a Service interface and multiple sub-interfaces that extend it,
with their own Implementations. How do I cast a Resource to the most
appropriate implementation?
The following client code checks sub-interfaces first and falls back
to the base interface:
if (serviceRes.canAs(com.ato
12 matches
Mail list logo
