Not really. Only in source code, but this part is not open-source.
It's a layer above Linked Data Templates:
https://atomgraph.github.io/Linked-Data-Templates/
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Abduladem Eljamel <
a_elja...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
> Thankyou very much Martynas. it realy helps
Thankyou very much Martynas. it realy helps.
Currently, I am wrting a report. I woud like to wrtie something like what you
mentioned in your email but I have to refernece it. do you any refrence say
what have said?
ThanksAbdul
On Friday, 6 October 2017, 17:48:54 GMT+1, Martynas Jusevičius
Abduladem,
you can use both CONSTRUCT and INSERT to infer new triples.
Both OWL and SPARQL have their advantages. OWL forms ontologies that you
can import etc., but often it produces too many (trivial) triples that you
don't care about, and performance can be poor. With SPARQL you can be more
pre
Thank you Claire Qiu
On Friday, 6 October 2017, 16:50:49 GMT+1, claire Qiu
wrote:
Hi,
as far as I understood, any inferred results are consistent with the KB.
They are the logical consequence of KB.
However, the facts inserted by SPARQL might violate with the KB, no
consistency ch
Thanks DiogoHowever, I think it is not possible to compare OWL or OWL
reasoning with SPARQL.What was in my mind when I asked the question is to
compare Rule-based reasoning with SPARQL.
ThanksAbdul
On Friday, 6 October 2017, 15:40:33 GMT+1, Diogo FC Patrao
wrote:
Hi
Please forgive a
Hi,
as far as I understood, any inferred results are consistent with the KB.
They are the logical consequence of KB.
However, the facts inserted by SPARQL might violate with the KB, no
consistency checking involved.
Inferencing is a service provided by Description Logics, SPARQL is just a
langua
Hi
Please forgive any mistakes below.
SPARQL is a language to deal with data; OWL is meant to deal with concepts.
You may argue that both can produce the same results. However there is an
important difference: the language.
As using owl one may represent both concepts and their relations in the
Hello,,
My simple understanding of Inferencing is “inferring new facts fromexisting
facts”. In that sense, I believe that there are some similarities of INSERT
command in SPARQL.
Can SPARQL be utilised in Inferencing?
Are there any researches in investigating the cons and pros of usingSPARQL