Well, it's kinda expected behavior. It's a split brain problem.
In the end, you use the same `application.id / group.id` and thus the
committed offsets for the removed topics are still in
`__consumer_offsets` topics and associated with the consumer group.
If a tool inspects lags and compares
Hi Robson,
Thank you for the detailed bug report.
I believe the behavior that you're describing is caused by this flaw:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15090 which is still under
discussion. Since the above flaw was introduced in 3.0, source
connectors need to return from poll() befor
Hello
I'm using kafka connect 7.4.0 to read data from Postgres views and write to
another Postgres tables. So using JDBC source and sink connectors.
All works good, but whenever I stop the source connectors via the rest api:
DEL http://kafka-connect:8083/connectors/connector_name_here
The connec
Hey Folks,
I have a process which aims to measure time lag (in Scala).
When the process bootstraps it looks at the history of offsets and collect
the offset that existed for different timestamps (7 days ago, 6 days ago...
etc in more frequency as it gets closer to *now*). In order to do that it
u
Hi streams Dev community @matthias, @bruno
Any inputs on above issue? Is this a bug in the streams library wherein the
input topic removed from streams processor topology, the underlying
consumer group still reporting lag against those?
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 4:38 PM Pushkar Deole wrote:
> Hi