Re[2]: stop sending SMS from all connections

2005-08-08 Thread Roman Lysenko
Hi. I have the same problem with routing based on SMSC. Kannel for some reason doesn't work properly with it. You could use routing based on phone prefixes or You could specify explicit SMSC name in params to /cgi-bin/sendsms. Hope it helps, Roman. > Hi,i have checked the options allowed-smscc-

Re: stop sending SMS from all connections

2005-08-08 Thread Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas
Hi,i have checked the options allowed-smscc-id and denided-smsc-id, but Kannel still sending messages using other ID instead of the one from the SMS come in.Should i use or have a group = sendsms-user for each grop = smscregards On Aug 8, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:Check the docume

Re: stop sending SMS from all connections

2005-08-08 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
Check the documentation on "allowed-smsc-id" and "denied-smsc-id".   Hope it helps,   Alejandro  On 8/9/05, Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I have  configured kannel with various 'smsc' groups, eachgroup has is own sms-id, sms-username and sms-password, etc al

stop sending SMS from all connections

2005-08-08 Thread Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas
Hi all, I have configured kannel with various 'smsc' groups, each group has is own sms-id, sms-username and sms-password, etc all the messages arrive correctly to each group, I have only one 'group = sendsms-user', and when I send a SMS that comes in for example to sms- id = kannel se

Re: Kannel eat memory too big

2005-08-08 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
1- Throttling could cause problems if you're receiving 5 messages per second but only allowed to send 1 per second...   2- If you have set too much or too many simultaneous connections, load could climb or requests could be serialized. Anyway, except you are receiving _very_ high loads of messages,

RE: immediate-sendsms-reply = true

2005-08-08 Thread Hillel
Hi, If I use the immediate-sendsms-reply = true do I still need to change the source as per your comment " I suggest to remove the config options from cfg.dev, and remove the if conditions from source, and just do what whould have been done if its enabled. (there is no else case in any of these if

Re: Kannel eat memory too big

2005-08-08 Thread Ady Wicaksono
1. Yes, i'm being throttled, receiver is not throttled but transmitter is throttled. However i run this application as transciever. 2.  Apache misconfigured -> what kind of misconfigured application ? I made application asynchronous, it means that kannel will forward sms to http application (

Re: Kannel eat memory too big

2005-08-08 Thread Alejandro Guerrieri
What it's obvious is that you're receiving messages faster than delivering. That means that sooner or later you get a whole bunch of queued messages.   A few things I'd check:   * Could be that you are being throttled? I don't think so (0.87 msgs/second doesn't look like a suitable throughput for t

immediate-sendsms-reply = true

2005-08-08 Thread Hillel
Hi, The immediate-sendsms-reply = true option in the smsbox for large load is interesting. But you also mentioned "I would suggest to remove this config option and its if's from smsbox, as i 've experienced too, that it makes kannel extremely unreliable." Are you saying this option makes the sys

Re: Kannel eat memory too big

2005-08-08 Thread Ady Wicaksono
Hi Chriss, sorry for late response, i'm restarting and waiting this kannel eating my memory :) I did, look at this complete log Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.0'. Build `Jul 20 2005 19:06:58', compiler `3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)'. System Linux, release 2.4.20-8smp, version #1 SMP