Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: You talking about TLV's right? It's a recurring issue, I think. Some operators ask for VARs to add this or that TLV to implement their custom billing module here or there and we are forced to do some terrible patch to comply with their specs. I did one once, it's not

Re: Radius , ignoring in WAPBOX

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
cool planet wrote: Hi Friends , I'm running kannel WAP box as my wapgateway , upto now most of implementations are success. but , when i observe the wapbox , there is one strange warning , WARNING: RADIUS: Could not find mapping for `192.168.10.100' session id 0001640622,

Re: USB Modem supported ?

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Leonard wrote: Could not say for sure, but if it supports AT command set and is CDC-ACM complaint it should work.. (on linux box anyways.) yep, as far as you can communicate via the USB serial line to the modem, and the AT command set is standard complient, you should be fine. Stipe

How to test Kannel as WAP Gateway?

2006-06-07 Thread aliraza raza
hello everyone, I want to test Kannel as a WAP Gateway but dont know how to do it. guide me after this step? All the configurations for wap box is done in conf file. like wapbox port and wapbox goup. first i have started my bearerbox service with command ./bearerbox -v 1

Re: How to test Kannel as WAP Gateway?

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
aliraza raza wrote: hello everyone, I want to test Kannel as a WAP Gateway but dont know how to do it. guide me after this step? All the configurations for wap box is done in conf file. like wapbox port and wapbox goup. first i have started my bearerbox service with command

What about PDU? - Re: SMPP 3.4 Optional params

2006-06-07 Thread Nikola Goran Cutura
Besides Kannel's intention to abstract specific protocols, I believe that passing complete PDU would have great value, too. People not familiar with protocols find great value in being able to use Kannel's abstractions but developers faimiliar with protocols (like myself) may feel better

TON / NPI parameter apparently being ignored

2006-06-07 Thread Ignacio Facello
Hello. I am running Kannel version 1.4.0 (apparently) on a Linux (Debian) box with kernel 2.6.8. In one of the connections I have setup, the TON and NPI parameters get overriden. My config file is as follows: group = smsc smsc = smpp interface-version = 34 smsc-id

Re: TON / NPI parameter apparently being ignored

2006-06-07 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ignacio Facello wrote: Hello. I am running Kannel version 1.4.0 (apparently) on a Linux (Debian) box with kernel 2.6.8. In one of the connections I have setup, the TON and NPI parameters get overriden. My config file is as follows: group = smsc smsc = smpp

j2me kannel: Sms to different port

2006-06-07 Thread Linkas
Hello, as I'm working with a J2ME application runnning on my phone in wich I can specify on which port I can listen for sms messages, I was wondering if anyone knows how to specify a specific destination port number with kannel when sending messages. I think this can be done setting the

Re: j2me kannel: Sms to different port

2006-06-07 Thread Wayne Khan
Hi Linkas, When you specify in the kannel config file: . . . group = smsbox bearerbox-host = localhost sendsms-port = 14013 global-sender = 123 log-file = /export/home/sites/sms/kannel/smsbox.log log-level = 1 access-log = /export/home/sites/sms/kannel/smsaccess.log The server will listen for