Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Juan Nin
So you're saying that on any server and/or architecture the results will be the same? Doesn't seem very reasonable... 2010/8/14 Nikos Balkanas : > Actually you have missed a couple of more emails. On fakesmpp submission I > also posted results from a low-end Solaris 10 64bit box. Very similar to

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Actually you have missed a couple of more emails. On fakesmpp submission I also posted results from a low-end Solaris 10 64bit box. Very similar to the results posted from the linux server. The averages seem pretty solid. So, contrary to your beliefs, it is not giving out the wrong impression.

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Juan Nin
Actually you're wrong. You would use the throughput directive if you want to restrict your throughput. If you don't want to restrict it then you should not set it at all (but you may receive throttling errors form the remote SMSC) On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:42 AM, sangprabv wrote: > You can use

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread sangprabv
You can use throughput directive :) Beware of your telco policy, some telcos limit MT from us ;) sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 14, 2010, at 1:33 AM, Ravindra Gupta // Viva wrote: > Dear Team, > > Sorry for previous mail. > > I am using kannel 1

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Juan Nin
Ok, just saw on another thread where you got those values from, but again, that's very system specific. I guess you point was just to say that Kannel was not the issue for his bottleneck, but saying "It can handle ~1000 MO/s, 750 MT/s (internal DLRs) or 450 MT/s (DB DLRs)" may give the wrong impre

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Juan Nin
2010/8/13 Nikos Balkanas : > > It is unlikely that kannel is your bottleneck. It can handle ~1000 MO/s, 750 > MT/s (internal DLRs) or 450 MT/s (DB DLRs). Just curious to know where do you get those values from... What Kannel supports depends on your hardware and architecture

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, It is unlikely that kannel is your bottleneck. It can handle ~1000 MO/s, 750 MT/s (internal DLRs) or 450 MT/s (DB DLRs). Compare that to 10-30 sms/s throughput of most SMScs. If you still want a fater kannel try: 1) Make sure that you have the right indeces in your DB. Some DBs are faster

Re: Slow submission from Kannel

2010-08-13 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, Something looks off from your description. Have you checked bb access.log timestamps, and they verify this delay? If yes, please post detailed relevant bb logs of your errors to see if they could be responsible. Does this happen with sms or just some? Tried sending acouple to yourself to

Re: AT Kannel for modem gsm

2010-08-13 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Hi, It certainly is feasible. Kannel supports all serial GSM modems, as well as usb based, as long as suitable usb driver exists for them in the OS. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Threader Slash To: Alvaro Cornejo Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 9:02 PM Subje

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Ravindra Gupta // Viva
Dear Team, Sorry for previous mail. I am using kannel 1.4.3 version. Please inform me how to improve performance/Speed delivery in sms using Kannel Server. Which parameters we have use and improve efficiency for kennel server. Give the suggestion On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Alvaro C

Re: AT Kannel for modem gsm

2010-08-13 Thread Threader Slash
Hi Alvaro, Actually, we already have this solution implemented using the Centurion/Siemens Libraries (based on Java). But now, we think to use Kannel, that we know to be based on C. We are migrating the solution for long distance monitoring. It integrates Sensors, Wirelless Modem, and PLC actuato

Re: AT Kannel for modem gsm

2010-08-13 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
Hi Kannel already has support for AT commands for sending/receiving sms as well as modem initialization. What exactly want you to do? Regards Alvaro |-| EnvĂ­e y Reciba Datos y mensaje

AT Kannel for modem gsm

2010-08-13 Thread Threader Slash
Hi Everybody.. I have a project to use AT commands in a CT65 Arm7 Siemens/Centurium modem. It will be used as GSM for data transmission. Programming will be impllemented using C/C++. Could someone tell if it is feasible to use Kannel in this kind of development? Thanks. ThreaderSlash

Fwd: Slow submission from Kannel

2010-08-13 Thread brett skinner
Hi Extra information which might be useful. We are running v1.4.3. Not the SVN version. Our smsc binds are using transceiver. Regards, -- Forwarded message -- From: brett skinner Date: Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:30 PM Subject: Slow submission from Kannel To: Users Hi users I am

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread sangprabv
Alvaro, maybe he talked about SMPP 3.4 :) Ravindra, please check userguide. There is throughput directive to speed up the MT. sangprabv sangpr...@gmail.com http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 13, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Alvaro Cornejo wrote: > Hi > > I think you have not things clear yet

Slow submission from Kannel

2010-08-13 Thread brett skinner
Hi users I am not sure what is going. Kannel seems to be running quite slowly. Before we submit a batch of SMS to Kannel we parse the status page for the queue size. From the status page I am using: *SMS: received 489 (0 queued), sent 0 (0 queued), store size -1* It seemed to me that the *sent 0

Re: Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Alvaro Cornejo
Hi I think you have not things clear yet. Please read the user guide. There is no kannel version 3.4, the latest version is 1.4.3 plus the svn... However kannel supports SMPP versions 3.3 and 3.4... Regards |

Kannel profermance

2010-08-13 Thread Ravindra Gupta // Viva
Dear Team, I am using kennel 3.4 version. Please inform me how to improve performance/Speed delivery in Kannel Server. Which parameters we have use and improve efficiency for kennel server. Give the suggestion -- Incase of any further queries, Please feel free to mail me or contact me on the nu