Hi,
Thanks.
Regards,
KRNRDB
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
No as far as I know, unless you hack the code
Regards
Alvaro
On 10/10/12, krnrd b krn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I mean even in submit_sm user
Hello Team,
Id like to thanks the whole users@kannel group, Alvaro,Rinor,Tapan, Joseph
for the guidance on urlencoding;
Im using a perl script to send out the messages and perl supports
CGI::Enurl; Implemented this with the same guidance that had been adised
for lynx -dump and the problem has
Hi lists,
I'm intentionally cross-posting here, sorry for the noise of those
getting it on both channels.
I have been finalizing the GSMA OneAPI v1.0 SOAP/XML protocol support
for Kannel for SMS send/receive. In fact in the meantime, as all seem to
jump on the SOAP/XML is sooo complicated,
Rene wrote:
1. You can increase the LIMIT without breaking things. This might
increase speed for large batches.
Actually after looking into *sqlbox_mysql.c* code I noticed even if you
increase the LIMIT, you won't benefit from this, because sqlbox always gets
only first row of the
Hi guys -
Any performance benefit in having multiple smsbox processes on the same
host?
Would really appreciate your thoughts
Doug
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Doug Dixon doug.di...@runthered.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at a Kannel installation that fires up 50 smsbox processes on
the
There is no WEB panel for monitoring SQLBox, but you can code one, it's
very easy I think.
Right now I'm using this code just to monitor what happens with kannel via
the WEB.
It gets current pending queue on multiple sqlbox'es and displays kannel's
status page. You can extend it to allow
Answering my own question with big thanks to Alejandro, who already did
that!
(I promise I will search better next time before posting)
Here is a link to the thread and patch in case anyone interested:
http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/2008-February/001597.html
