RE: NEED HELP!! in sqlbox..

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
As I understand correctly what you want to do, there's two options. Run smsbox - sqlbox - bearerbox. Smsbox does accept http connections and they will be saved in the sent_sms table (see users manual). The other option is to write a simple php/asp script that accepts the message

RE: dlr-mask ignored status 4

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
What is the value of registered_delivery flag of the original smpp message? == Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Jose Figueroa Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 4:20 To: users@kannel.org Subject: dlr-mask ignored status 4 Hello guys Today

Re: dlr-mask ignored status 4

2013-03-06 Thread Alexander Malysh
Hi, this is not a issue with registered_delivery_flag it's just wrong dlr_mask = 19 that you use. You have to put dlr_mask = 4 into requested dlr_mask ( for example dlr_mask = 23). Alex Am 06.03.2013 um 12:42 schrieb Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl: What is the value of registered_delivery

RE: How SMS Sends PDU to kannel

2013-03-06 Thread Ombongi Moraa Fe
Hello Kannel Team, Thanks for the support this forum Provides; I've come a long way through them. I didn't set up my Organizations' kannel connection with smsc so I'm not sure what parameters they required. Also, I can't inquire this from SMSC - that would be a longer process. I would like to

RE: How SMS Sends PDU to kannel

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
Google for smpp 3.4 specifications. From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Ombongi Moraa Fe Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 13:15 To: users@kannel.org Subject: RE: How SMS Sends PDU to kannel Hello Kannel Team, Thanks for the support this forum Provides;

RE: dlr-mask ignored status 4

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
dlr-mask = 4 means that the message has been buffered. There is no such indication in the smpp specifications. So opensmppbox is correct about dropping that dlr. == Rene From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 13:11 To:

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Jam Hitz
Hello, Sorry, I think I had read it wrong. The SMSC says that I am not responding to deliver_sm (not sending deliver_sm_resp) {NOT submit_sm_resp} as earlier indicated. What could be causing this? Please assist On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Alexander Malysh amal...@kannel.org wrote: And

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Jam Hitz
Here is the Bearerbox Log (Please NOTE: Upon the recommendations of the telco, I have created 10 instances of saf_receiver_b SMSC as defined in the config). I shared my settings with the telco and they are also insisting that I raise window setting to 500 even though the documentation says maximum

RE: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
So you do send a deliver_sm_resp. Just with an empty message id. Let me look at this closer. -Original Message- From: Jam Hitz [mailto:is.mu...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 18:40 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp Here is the

Re: NEED HELP!! in sqlbox..

2013-03-06 Thread Gilbert Perez
thanks... currently i'm trying to work on your first suggestion  regarding the second option, may you give me a link/ sample script or anything insightful that can guide me?  From: Rene Kluwen rene.klu...@chimit.nl To: 'Gilbert Perez'