Hi,
Hope everyone is doing well!!
I want to find out if the custom logging for bearerbox has a feature where
you can log the error code returned by an SMSC for a FAILED SMS in the
access log. I need this to help troubleshoot failures faster and also for
reporting.
John G.
Hi all,
Any one faced this issue before?
Sorry just curious to know .
Thanks,
KRNRDB
On Thursday, January 23, 2014, krnrd b krn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am using kannel 1.5.0 devel version. When i use Tx and Rx separated
while connecting SMSC now problem is when submit_sm happening
Please don´t email me directly with Kannel questions, but use
users@kannel.org.
In your group = core, add smsbox-port = 13002.
-Original Message-
From: hamid2kv...@hotmail.com [mailto:hamid2kv...@hotmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 23 januari 2014 13:24
To: rene.klu...@chimit.nl
Subject:
Currently the Tx and Rx binds are named RND-1 and RND-1-Rx.
Wouldn't the SMPP binds have to be named the same for the DLR/ID matching to
work?
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of krnrd b
Sent: 23 January 2014 12:22
To: users
Subject: Re: DLR: received showing 0 in kannel
How would I match DLR/ID ?
for Kannel 1.4.3 I use same configuration incoming and outgoing shows
properly.
Thanks,
KRNRDB
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Ciaran Scolard cia...@phonovation.comwrote:
Currently the Tx and Rx binds are named RND-1 and RND-1-Rx.
Wouldn’t the SMPP binds have
I have try to rename RND-1-Rx bind to RND-1 same then dlr received showing
on kannel status page but the serious problem is the dlr's which i am
receiving, kannel sending the same dlr in submit_sm that means on Tx
connection the same delivery report submitted as submit_sm.
But when i use TRx mode
Dear all,
I am looking for SMPP load balancing solution for MT traffic.
Kannel 1
/
SMSC == Load Balancer (smpp proxy) ==
What happens if you configure both Kannel 1 Kannel 2 with the same smsc
configurations?
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Abdul Basit
Sent: donderdag 23 januari 2014 19:43
To: users
Subject: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic
Dear all,
I am looking for
We use an approach like that and works fine. However, queues are local to each
box, so if a box goes down queued messages are stuck there until the box gets
back up. Queues are also not balanced, so if you have a million messages on one
box an zero on the other there's no way to balance that.
I have added smsbox-port=13002 in group core of opensmpp.conf file. But it
doesnt work for me. Any other mistake.
Regards
Hamid R. Hashmi
From: rene.kluwen
To: hamid2kv...@hotmail.com
CC: users@kannel.org
Subject: RE: Please help me in configureing Opensmppbox (bind Failed)
Date: Thu, 23
Hi All,
Any inputs for the issue I am facing.
Please point me in right direction if I am doing any mistake.
Thanks,
KRNRDB
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:47 PM, krnrd b krn...@gmail.com wrote:
I have try to rename RND-1-Rx bind to RND-1 same then dlr received showing
on kannel status page but
Dear Krnrd,
Please use same smsc-id name for TX as well as RX session (RND-1).
Kindly find the sample example in given below.
SMSC connections:
RND-1[RND-1]SMPP:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:2161/0:TestAT:SMPP_RND (online
72s, rcvd: sms 0 / dlr 0, sent: sms 1 / dlr 0, failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
When i did that the delivery report which is coming on Rx connection re
submited to Tx connection.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, John alero johnale...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Krnrd,
Please use same smsc-id name for TX as well as RX session (RND-1).
Kindly find the sample example in
Dear Krnrd,
Please share your Kannel access logs as well as well as smsc conf file.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:50 AM, krnrd b krn...@gmail.com wrote:
When i did that the delivery report which is coming on Rx connection re
submited to Tx connection.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, John
14 matches
Mail list logo
