Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-07 Thread Rinor Hoxha
> 2013-03-06 20:32:11 [26488] [15] DEBUG: SMPP[saf_receiver_b]: Got PDU: > > 2013-03-06 20:32:11 [26488] [15] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f36ce40 dump: > > 2013-03-06 20:32:11 [26488] [15] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link_resp > > 2013-03-06 20:32:11 [26488] [15] DEBUG: command_id: 2147

RE: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-07 Thread Rene Kluwen
Right... So I don't see the problem here... -Original Message- From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: donderdag 7 maart 2013 11:42 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Jam Hitz'; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp Rene, del

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-07 Thread Alexander Malysh
gt; Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 18:40 > To: Rene Kluwen > Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org > Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp > > Here is the Bearerbox Log (Please NOTE: Upon the recommendations of the > telco, I have created 10 instances of saf_receiver_b SMSC as defined in

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-07 Thread Jam Hitz
: woensdag 6 maart 2013 18:40 > To: Rene Kluwen > Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org > Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp > > Here is the Bearerbox Log (Please NOTE: Upon the recommendations of the > telco, I have created 10 instances of saf_receiver_b SMSC as defined in the >

RE: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
So you do send a deliver_sm_resp. Just with an empty message id. Let me look at this closer. -Original Message- From: Jam Hitz [mailto:is.mu...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 18:40 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Alexander Malysh; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp Here is the

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Jam Hitz
ls of the appropriate message? > > -Original Message- > From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf > Of Jam Hitz > Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 16:34 > To: Alexander Malysh > Cc: users@kannel.org > Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp &g

RE: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Rene Kluwen
Could you maybe share some log files details of the appropriate message? -Original Message- From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Jam Hitz Sent: woensdag 6 maart 2013 16:34 To: Alexander Malysh Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: No submit_sm_resp

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-06 Thread Jam Hitz
Hello, Sorry, I think I had read it wrong. The SMSC says that I am not responding to deliver_sm (not sending deliver_sm_resp) {NOT submit_sm_resp} as earlier indicated. What could be causing this? Please assist On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Alexander Malysh wrote: > And Kannel send generick N

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-05 Thread Alexander Malysh
And Kannel send generick NACK for unknown/wrong commands. Alex Am 05.03.2013 um 16:01 schrieb Jason Mule : > Jam, > > The SMSC should send messages to you using either deliver_sm or data_sm PDUs. > > On 5 March 2013 09:24, Jam Hitz wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I have a very long queue of messages

Re: No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-05 Thread Jason Mule
Jam, The SMSC should send messages to you using either deliver_sm or data_sm PDUs. On 5 March 2013 09:24, Jam Hitz wrote: > Hello. > > I have a very long queue of messages at the SMSC that Kannel is > picking up very, very slowly. We did a tcpdump and they concluded that > Kannel was not sending

No submit_sm_resp

2013-03-04 Thread Jam Hitz
Hello. I have a very long queue of messages at the SMSC that Kannel is picking up very, very slowly. We did a tcpdump and they concluded that Kannel was not sending a submit_sm_resp after getting a submit_sm causing the SMSC to re-transmit the submit_sm over and over, hence the delay. Please help