on't understand... :) And I can not make
patches in C too :(
Ivars
-Original Message-
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 13:41:49 +0200
From: Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kannel 1.3.2 - kannel confounds DLRs - how can i make
sure that i get
On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 13:41 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
from where will you receive this unique id? from smsc you will get _only_
timestamp in case for EMI and msg-id for smpp...
Do we get the recipient of the message in subject? So we can compare that too.
--
Enver ALTIN
Ivars Jukams wrote:
> --
> Why couldn't we ? it's just a question of inserting the DLR /before
> /sending, looking
> at the last inserted ID and use it instead of the couple timestamp /
> smsc ...
> --
>
> Of course, there is no problem, may
--
Why couldn't we ? it's just a question of inserting the DLR /before
/sending, looking
at the last inserted ID and use it instead of the couple timestamp /
smsc ...
--
Of course, there is no problem, maybe with making the patch, but I don
Enver ALTIN wrote:
> Merhaba,
>
> On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:04 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>> would you please explain how autoincrement should work?
>
> It simply won't work for this purpose, because we can't embed this
> unique ID to the message we have requested DLR for. Am I right?
yes, y
Why couldn't we ? it's just a question of inserting the DLR /before
/sending, looking
at the last inserted ID and use it instead of the couple timestamp /
smsc ...
Enver ALTIN wrote:
Merhaba,
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:04 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
would you please explain how autoincrement
Merhaba,
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 14:04 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> would you please explain how autoincrement should work?
It simply won't work for this purpose, because we can't embed this
unique ID to the message we have requested DLR for. Am I right?
--
Enver ALTIN |
r help!!!
>
> gordon
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 13:07:25 +0300
> From: "Ivars Jukams"
> Subject: Re: kannel 1.3.2 - kannel confounds DLRs - how can i make
> sure that i get the correct dlr-statu
: "Ivars Jukams"
Subject: Re: kannel 1.3.2 - kannel confounds DLRs - how can i make
sure that i get the correct dlr-status for sms?
kannel can use microtime for ts
or also add autoincrement field in dlr db and use it together with ts or
wothout ts.
kannel can use microtime for ts
or also add autoincrement field in dlr db and use it together with ts or
wothout ts.
Hi gordon,
you're analysis is correct. the 3 sms will all have the same DLR (smsc
and ts). Because of this, Kannel can not guarantee that you will get
the same DLR (database) entry upon reception of the DLR from the SMSC.
this is quite unfortunate when you are trying to provide acurate logging
hi together,
following problem:
we have setup kannel 1.3.2 with mysql-support ... all is working correct!
but the DLRs makeing problem, because kannel does confound them.
kannel create for each sms - i send to him - a timestamp and store that
(with some
other data) in the mysql.
but it could ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
