Hi,
looks like the current wiki code has a problem with FireFox 9.0, the menu
is displayed under the main content div. It seems (
http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/906789#answer-290813 or
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=25t=2392487) like a browser
sniffing problem in wiki
After some research apparently it was fixed in MediaWiki 1.16 released
2010-07-28 (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31807)
2012/1/4 Andrey Ivanov andrey.iva...@polytechnique.fr
Hi,
looks like the current wiki code has a problem with FireFox 9.0, the
menu is displayed under
The 389 team will be switching to trac for keeping track of
bugs/enhancement requests/issues instead of Red Hat Bugzilla.
* Why?
We needed a clear separation between upstream 389 development and
downstream Red Hat product/process. It was getting too confusing
using bugzilla for both
On 01/04/2012 02:13 AM, Andrey Ivanov wrote:
After some research apparently it was fixed in MediaWiki 1.16 released
2010-07-28 (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31807)
Thanks Andrey. We are working on it.
2012/1/4 Andrey Ivanov andrey.iva...@polytechnique.fr
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:51 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
What is in killfox??
A shell script to kill firefox when it used to give me problems a while
back. All it contains is
killall -6 firefox-bin
killall -6
On 01/04/2012 03:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Though I really appreciate both of your replies, I am looking at them
and seeing that Marvin is saying it needs to be +x and Ed is saying
it doesn't. I ran a test and -x seems to work.
FYI, Marvin corrected himself saying
Sorry..
My bad...
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell pnew...@cs.cmu.eduwrote:
On 1/3/2012 11:42 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
HI
Sorry..
My bad...
The make is +x..
Marivn
Marvin and Ed:
Though I really appreciate both of your replies, I am looking at them and
seeing that Marvin is
On 01/04/2012 04:01 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com
mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:51 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
What is in killfox??
A shell script to kill firefox when it used to give me
On 01/04/2012 04:07 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
And I agree with you.. When I write shell scripts I use a .sh
extension. Just to make it easy on myself.. It help me identify .sh
from .txt files..
My point is simply that .sh or any other extension is meaningless to the
OS. It may be helpful to
[inline]
On 1/4/2012 12:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Though I really appreciate both of your replies, I am looking at them
and seeing that Marvin is saying it needs to be +x and Ed is saying
it doesn't. I ran a test and -x seems to work.
FYI,
On 01/04/2012 04:14 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
[inline]
On 1/4/2012 12:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:59 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Though I really appreciate both of your replies, I am looking at them
and seeing that Marvin is saying it needs to be +x and Ed is saying
it
On 1/4/2012 12:11 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I never use extensions.
Ed:
Though I can't stand the MS world of extensions meaning something, I
can't imagine not using extensions to help understand what is there. The
system shouldn't give a damn, but the user needs all the help he/she can
On 01/04/2012 04:17 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Though I can't stand the MS world of extensions meaning something, I
can't imagine not using extensions to help understand what is there.
The system shouldn't give a damn, but the user needs all the help
he/she can get (smile)
Sure, and if
On 1/4/2012 12:17 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
FYI, Marvin corrected himself saying
Sorry..
My bad...
The make is +x..
So I should chmod all {M,m}akefile(s) to rwxr-x-r-x?
I've already demonstrated that it isn't necessary.
And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin
On 1/4/2012 12:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:17 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Though I can't stand the MS world of extensions meaning something, I
can't imagine not using extensions to help understand what is there.
The system shouldn't give a damn, but the user needs all the help
On 01/04/2012 04:22 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin says
make it +x and you are saying it doesn't need to be. I asked this
dumb question to find out how I should treat this situation regardless
of what works. Its about understanding
On 04-01-12 06:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
hi
i would like to drop all icoming packets of any ip tried
to connect to telnet (port 23) which is meant as trap
for port-scans, there are some samples out there but i got
none of them working until now :-(
iptables -N port-scan
iptables -A port-scan -p
Around 08:17am on Wednesday, January 04, 2012 (UK time), Paul Allen Newell
scrawled:
On 1/4/2012 12:11 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I never use extensions.
Ed:
Though I can't stand the MS world of extensions meaning something, I
can't imagine not using extensions to help understand what
On 01/04/2012 04:26 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
air enough ... I understand. If I worked at your place, I would panic
at not having the extensions as a text-based clue. I spent too many
years at too many places to understand that seeing an extension on a
file gave me a sense of what the
On 1/4/2012 12:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:22 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin says
make it +x and you are saying it doesn't need to be. I asked this
dumb question to find out how I should treat this situation regardless
[inline]
On 1/4/2012 12:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well, I'm sorry you'd panic
I wish I had qualified that statement with a smile ... please allow me
to edit prior comment.
We'd just use the file command to find out what the intended use is
and adhere to a standard of putting
On 1/4/2012 12:30 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
The case against extensions in this context is that the user shouldn't
have to change if the shell script is rewritten in a different language.
Having to change from foobar.sh to foobar.pl just because of this change
isn't user friendly. And what if you
On 01/04/2012 04:38 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
[inline]
On 1/4/2012 12:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well, I'm sorry you'd panic
I wish I had qualified that statement with a smile ... please allow
me to edit prior comment.
OK :-)
We'd just use the file command to find out what
On 1/4/2012 12:46 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well, we always will put the files/command (end product of compilation)
in directories that tend to clue one in on the purpose. /bin /sbin
/usr/bin, etc. And, we only put +x on the files that really need them.
Hardly ever needing to use the file command
Sorry for reincornating this thread, but I'm planning to package
pdfedit fo f16. According to admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb it's
orphaned.
On 10/12/2011, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/10/2011 10:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/12/11 09:42, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the moment and it's wasting
my time.
Richard.
--
users mailing list
Stephen Gallagher píše v Út 03. 01. 2012 v 16:10 -0500:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:51 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote:
Pavel,
Are you sure the LDAP server allows listing all users? It's quite normal
to turn that off.
By default, SSSD doesn't allow listing all users/groups because it
presents
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:51:05 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just
Paul Allen Newell pnewell at cs.cmu.edu writes:
...
For questions on my syntax of *.sh, I have believed since my earliest
days that a shell file (be it .sh, .csh, .tcsh, or .bash) that
it has to be +x as it is an executable. If I am incorrect, I would
love to know, though it may take me
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:27 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:51:05 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 10:51 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:27 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:51:05 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 23:19 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
To the list:
I am dealing with a primary Fedora machine and a alternate WinXP under
cygwin. Cygwin always screw up the permissions when I drag stuff over to
it and then bring it back to the Fedora box. I've got scripts to handle
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Linda McLeod wrote:
[snip troll-spam]
OK. I've had enough. List admins, could you please issue a warning
to this user? They have a history[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] of posting
troll comments, which has started to become spam.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:27:11AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
to take it up with the fedora board I believe.
FWIW, I'm willing to moderate (after effect,
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:51 +0100, Pavel Lisy wrote:
Stephen Gallagher píše v St 04. 01. 2012 v 07:31 -0500:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 12:03 +0100, Pavel Lisy wrote:
Stephen Gallagher píše v Út 03. 01. 2012 v 16:10 -0500:
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 15:51 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote:
Pavel,
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:37:30AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:27 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:51:05 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm
I've got an old Asus EEE PC 900 model, with the original, ancient Ubuntu on
it, whose fate I'm pondering. Has anyone tried installing Fedora on its 4GB
SSD drive. That should be big enough to accomodate the live image, I'd
think, the only unknown factor is whether the stock Fedora kernel
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:55:28 -0430
Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 11:27 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:51:05 +
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:06:01 -0200
Germán A. Racca german.ra...@gmail.com wrote:
$ gsettings set org.gnome.gnote use-status-icon true
A very nice gem! This has been bugging me for a while.
Thanks.
--
Brian Millett
Do you know what its like when telepaths make love, Commander? You drop
On 1/4/2012 3:40 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 1/4/2012 12:30 AM, Steve Searle wrote:
The case against extensions in this context is that the user shouldn't
have to change if the shell script is rewritten in a different language.
Having to change from foobar.sh to foobar.pl just because of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
I've got an old Asus EEE PC 900 model, with the original, ancient Ubuntu on
it, whose fate I'm pondering. Has anyone tried installing Fedora on its 4GB
SSD drive. That should be big enough to accomodate the live image,
Am 04.01.2012 09:29, schrieb Patrick Lists:
On 04-01-12 06:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
hi
i would like to drop all icoming packets of any ip tried
to connect to telnet (port 23) which is meant as trap
for port-scans, there are some samples out there but i got
none of them working until now
From: Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 4:18 PM
To: Groten, Ryan
Cc: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: Re: [389-users] bak2db restore got stuck in infinite loop
On 01/03/2012 03:50 PM, Groten, Ryan wrote:
From:
On 01/04/2012 10:51 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the moment and it's
On 01/04/2012 05:06 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I see the users and can log in etc,
however every client machine fails to shut down after being configured
Hmm, that's interesting. If it's only happening once the ipa client
install is done, then it's probably an SSSD issue.
I think it could
g wrote:
On 01/04/2012 10:51 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 January 2012 23:05, Linda McLeod lindavald...@fastmail.fm wrote:
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the
Hi,
A bit of background first :) I have a netbook which connects to my LAN
via a Wifi connection and I've configured autofs to pull it's maps from
an LDAP directory. The network connection is working exactly as expected
and receives a reserved IP address assigned by DHCP. The network
On 01/04/2012 12:32 AM, Andrey Ivanov wrote:
Bugzilla will not be used any more (at all)?
It will still be used for some things. Some people will enter bugs into
the system by filing a bug against Fedora or Fedora EPEL for the
particular component of 389 in that release (e.g. Fedora -
Hi,
I have one of those and Installed many Fedora reseases. Currently it's running
F14 with compiz enabled (!)
[]s, Fernando Lozano
Original Message
From: Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
To: For users of Fedora Core releases users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Qua, Jan 4,
On 01/03/2012 10:52 PM, Israel Nelken wrote:
I tried to install the directory server on a machine with a clean
installation of Fedora 16, fully updated. the setup script failed at
the state of starting the admin server. I fully removed the
installation (remove-ds-admin.pl
Olav Vitters olav at vitters.nl writes:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:27:11AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
to take it up with the fedora board I believe.
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the moment and it's wasting
my time.
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
to take it
On 01/04/2012 03:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
You know, I would have taken the same view if it wasn't that this had been
directed personally at me. Funny how that changes things. I wouldn't be
very happy if I just blocked it from my own client but still found this
crap broadcast all over.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
the only unknown factor is whether the stock Fedora kernel will know
what to do with the funky SSD drive in that thing.
I doubt that will be a problem. I had stock F14 on my 900A. Although I
preferred some of the other, lighter, spins; they
On 01/04/2012 09:18 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
about this user, who's now being moderated.
Bummer.
I never paid any attention to what Linda had to say. It was *way* more
fun reading reactions to her posts. :-)
--
A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Dennis Kaptain dkapt...@yahoo.com.mxwrote:
Either the moderators ban this user, or I'm unsubscribing. The
signal-to-noise ratio is just too low at the moment and it's wasting
my time.
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:38:15PM +, JB wrote:
Olav Vitters olav at vitters.nl writes:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:27:11AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 23:28 +0800, Ian Chapman wrote:
Hi,
A bit of background first :) I have a netbook which connects to my LAN
via a Wifi connection and I've configured autofs to pull it's maps from
an LDAP directory. The network connection is working exactly as expected
and receives a
Olav Vitters olav at vitters.nl writes:
...
For anyone reading along: At the Desktop Summit at least 10 people
thanked me personally for the moderation I do on the GNOME mailing
lists. Also get a thanks in the presentation of the GNOME foundation
meeting (during GUADEC Desktop Summit).
This is not a list to be moderated by half-witts of your caliber.
Get lost.
A fine demonstration of why the list needs moderating.
Actually Olav does a rather good job on the Gnome lists I've seen. I'm not
sure I agree with all his choices but he does manage to stop them turning
into junk
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:33:15PM -0200, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
Hi,
I have one of those and Installed many Fedora reseases. Currently it's
running F14 with compiz enabled (!)
I've installed Fedora 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 on my eeepc 901. Mine has
a 4 gig SSD and a (slower) 16 gig
Alan Cox alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk writes:
This is not a list to be moderated by half-witts of your caliber.
Get lost.
A fine demonstration of why the list needs moderating.
Actually Olav does a rather good job on the Gnome lists I've seen. I'm not
sure I agree with all his choices
On 01/04/2012 08:18 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I've got an old Asus EEE PC 900 model, with the original, ancient
Ubuntu on it, whose fate I'm pondering. Has anyone tried installing
Fedora on its 4GB SSD drive. That should be big enough to accomodate
the live image, I'd think, the only unknown
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
I think with 4gb your pushing it when getting into preupgrading or updating
, where extra space is required.
I have a 8gb 900 that I had Fedora on it and I still ran into problems of
not having enough extra space. I still had
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:39 AM, JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan Cox alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk writes:
This is not a list to be moderated by half-witts of your caliber.
Get lost.
A fine demonstration of why the list needs moderating.
Actually Olav does a rather good job
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/2012 10:39 AM, JB wrote:
Alan Cox alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk writes:
This is not a list to be moderated by half-witts of your caliber.
Get lost.
A fine demonstration of why the list needs moderating.
Actually Olav does a rather
On 1/4/2012 10:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I never paid any attention to what Linda had to say. It was*way* more
fun reading reactions to her
You sure that was a she? Got a spam message two days ago from a charles
mcleod - just saying...
I did find all the indignant chest beating pretty funny,
On 2012/01/04 09:16, Claude Jones wrote:
On 1/4/2012 10:50 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I never paid any attention to what Linda had to say. It was*way* more
fun reading reactions to her
You sure that was a she? Got a spam message two days ago from a charles mcleod -
just saying...
I did find all
Mikkel L. Ellertson mellertson at gmail.com writes:
...
JB,
It indicates that he can do a good job of moderating a list. Think
of it as a job reference.
Mikkel
- --
Mikkel,
you are very easy here to set up (because that's what it is) when you want to
drive away one mostly
On 01/05/2012 12:18 AM, John Austin wrote:
and in order for the network connection to be successful it needs an
IPv4 address. So my question is, why does autofs get started before an
IPv4 address has been made available? Is there a reasonable way to fix this?
Does this help ?
Used it for
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 05:27:08PM +, JB wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson mellertson at gmail.com writes:
...
JB,
It indicates that he can do a good job of moderating a list. Think
of it as a job reference.
Mikkel
- --
Mikkel,
you are very easy here to set up (because that's
On 01/04/2012 08:39 AM, JB wrote:
By making himself available to this list with the justification as he did it,
he showed that he is a complete buffoon !
I say to him once again - get lost !
Mr. Pot, may I introduce you to my friend Mr. Kettle?
--
users mailing list
Joe Zeff joe at zeff.us writes:
...
Mr. Pot, may I introduce you to my friend Mr. Kettle?
Well, welcome to the club.
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/2012 11:27 AM, JB wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson mellertson at gmail.com writes:
...
JB,
It indicates that he can do a good job of moderating a list. Think
of it as a job reference.
Mikkel
- --
Mikkel,
you are very easy here to set
Am 04.01.2012 06:54, schrieb Reindl Harald:
hi
i would like to drop all icoming packets of any ip tried
to connect to telnet (port 23) which is meant as trap
for port-scans, there are some samples out there but i got
none of them working until now :-(
iptables -N port-scan
iptables -A
Jim writes:
I think with 4gb your pushing it when getting into preupgrading or
updating , where extra space is required.
I have a 8gb 900 that I had Fedora on it and I still ran into problems of not
having enough extra space. I still had Fedora running and reconized all the
hardware
Mikkel L. Ellertson mellertson at gmail.com writes:
...
You missed the point. Weather moderating this list is a desirable
option or not does not affect how well he does as a moderator. Your
comment did not address the question of weather this list needs to
be moderated, it only addressed
g wrote:
On 01/04/2012 03:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
You know, I would have taken the same view if it wasn't that this had been
directed personally at me. Funny how that changes things. I wouldn't be
very happy if I just blocked it from my own client but still found this
crap
On 1/4/2012 11:08 AM, JB wrote:
I am for restoring Linda to her full list membership, w/o moderation.
JB
a big -1 (as in no) --- this is one of the few times I would
consider blinking html (smile)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
On 04-01-12 20:08, JB wrote:
I think this list should not be moderated at all because as I already said it
can be easily manipulated into killing it.
IMO that Linda person is killing this list and with the baseless
personal attack on Neal this Linda person has shown to be a threat to
the
Alan Cox wrote:
Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
to take it up with the fedora board I believe.
No doubt some people have done so, but most people? Do you have
information on this?
On 1/4/2012 4:04 AM, JB wrote:
Paul Allen Newellpnewellat cs.cmu.edu writes:
Sleep well, the polarity is still intact :-)
Would the following be helpful ?
# ls -l /etc/init.d/network
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 7448 Feb 25 2011 /etc/init.d/network
# file /etc/init.d/network
Hi;
How do I get rid of the Universal Access icon in the upper right hand
corner/panel? Googled but seems every distribution has a different
answer. How do I get rid of it in Fedora 16, preferably using the
icon-manage extension in dconf-editor if there is such away. Nothing I
have tried seems
With Fedora 16 I don't see how to enable smartcard logins for GDM.
I have pcscd and openct working and /etc/pam_pkcs11/pam_pkcs11.conf
correctly configured to use opensc. pklogin_finder returns the right
things and I can log in at the console login prompt.
I have gdm-3.2.1.1-8.fc16.x86_64
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:04:16PM -0500, William Case wrote:
How do I get rid of the Universal Access icon in the upper right hand
corner/panel? Googled but seems every distribution has a different
answer. How do I get rid of it in Fedora 16, preferably using the
icon-manage extension in
On 01/04/2012 07:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Not yet, but can't wait to say, apply for a job, or a loan, and have
someone google me and this shows up.
-=-
i did, just for more laughs, look at links Linda post and i did note that
search params where not full and correct.
if that is among your
On 01/04/2012 04:04 PM, William Case wrote:
How do I get rid of the Universal Access icon in the upper right hand
corner/panel? Googled but seems every distribution has a different
answer. How do I get rid of it in Fedora 16, preferably using the
icon-manage extension in dconf-editor if there
Am 04.01.2012 22:10, schrieb g:
On 01/04/2012 07:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Not yet, but can't wait to say, apply for a job, or a loan, and have
someone google me and this shows up.
-=-
i did, just for more laughs, look at links Linda post and i did note that
search params where not
On 1/4/2012 4:38 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I know you and Ed (and Marvin) have been round the block on this, but if
you'll allow an oldie to sum up:
Makefiles are not normally executables, in fact they aren't normally
Shell scripts. Therefore they don't need to have the +x attribute. It's
On 01/02/2012 04:02:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/03/2012 06:20 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
On 01/02/2012 01:19:37 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/03/2012 02:51 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
mount -v -v -v -t nfs4 mtranch://nfs4exports/home /mtranch-home
Cats having me up for a moment again
On 01/04/2012 08:06 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
If you want them to be directly executable, yes. But if you call them
as input to a shell they need not be.
-=-
in addition, run this;
man .
that will give you some more insight to executing files.
--
peace out.
tc.hago,
g
.
*please
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:23 +, Alan Cox wrote:
No doubt some people have done so, but most people? Do you have
information on this? Enquiring minds want to know.
Plot graphs of active contributors to this list and their active time
on
the list before leaving, compare with the power
Patrick Lists fedora-list at puzzled.xs4all.nl writes:
On 04-01-12 20:08, JB wrote:
I think this list should not be moderated at all because as I already said
it
can be easily manipulated into killing it.
IMO that Linda person is killing this list and with the baseless
personal
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 22:10 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:04:16PM -0500, William Case wrote:
How do I get rid of the Universal Access icon in the upper right hand
corner/panel? Googled but seems every distribution has a different
answer. How do I get rid of it in
On 04-01-12 22:10, g wrote:
besides, do you really think that what shows up with simple a google
search is going to be all that is run?
A company that does background checks told me that cutting corners is
exactly what happens in their industry. A quick Google? Check. Searched
Facebook?
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:19 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 1/4/2012 4:38 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I know you and Ed (and Marvin) have been round the block on this, but if
you'll allow an oldie to sum up:
Makefiles are not normally executables, in fact they aren't normally
On 01/04/2012 08:22 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin says
make it +x and you are saying it doesn't need to be. I asked this dumb
question to find out how I should treat this situation regardless of
what works. Its about
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:19:51 -0800, PAN (Paul) wrote:
On 1/4/2012 4:38 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I know you and Ed (and Marvin) have been round the block on this, but if
you'll allow an oldie to sum up:
Makefiles are not normally executables, in fact they aren't normally
Shell
On 01/04/2012 09:36 PM, g wrote:
an addition to give you something to consider...
there is no such thing as a 'dumb question'. when unsure about
something, one should always ask questions to prevent making
'dumb errors' and 'dumb mistakes'.
what is _dumb_ is using just 'dumb question' as the
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
