On 01/04/2012 08:22 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: <> > And that's the confusion on my end. You are stating that Marvin says > "make it +x" and you are saying it doesn't need to be. I asked this dumb > question to find out how I should treat this situation regardless of > "what works". Its about understanding whether a makefile is an > executable or if make is just treating it as input and the executable > part is under the hood. -=-
in addition to; [man|info] . have a look at; [man|info] make [man|info] bash [man|info] tcsh *note* .sh = bash .csh = tcsh to save your self time, try running '[man|info] word/command' to see how something work. then when you get confused, post to list for further confusion. 8-D -- peace out. tc.hago, g . *please reply "plain text" only. "html text" are deleted* **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** The installation instructions stated to install Windows 2000 or better. So I installed Linux. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
