I guess the caches can be different always their values be upper the
required for a correct performance in all the machines.
Regards,
Moses
2013/2/21 Patrick Raspante patrickraspa...@gmail.com
Is it required (or at least suggested) that multi-mastered directory
server instances have the
On 2/21/2013 8:27 AM, Patrick Raspante wrote:
Is it required (or at least suggested) that multi-mastered directory
server instances have the equal values for dbcache and entry cache
settings? If so, what adverse effects result from not configuring the
caches similarly?
There's no
On 2/21/2013 11:11 AM, Patrick Raspante wrote:
I was mostly curious if the difference in cache configurations has any
negative effect on the integrity of the replication agreement between
the directory instances.
To illustrate, say one directory instance is managing several root
suffixes and
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum
or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)?
No, but there's a better way! All of our spec files are available in git,
and the fedpkg command is a nice wrapper around
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Am going to look into thisas I want to build a server at home,
and see what I can do with it.maybe some form of central
information repository?..I'll think of something!
Having a
On 02/18/2013 06:31 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:50:22 +1030
Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 15:22 -0500, jonc wrote:
Still, FOSS has no reliable way to measure who likes what, or who uses
what...
Or who despises something, but still carries on using it, anyway. Nor
can
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 01:01:58 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
yumdownloader --source foobar
and extract it:
rpm2cpio foobar*.src.rpm | cpio -idmuv *.spec
Thanks very much for the detailed descriptions! I was wondering also:
is it possible to pull the .tar.gz (and/or the patches) in a
On 02/18/2013 08:15 AM, jonc wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Am going to look into thisas I want to build a server at home,
and see what I can do with it.maybe some form of central
information
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:51 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Feb 18, 2013 10:16 AM, Beartooth bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
For some time, both Firefox and Seamonkey have been popping
up
complaint notices every few seconds; and every few minutes one or
both
will crash. This
On 2/21/2013 5:28 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 02/18/2013 08:15 AM, jonc wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Am going to look into thisas I want to build a server at home,
and see what I can do with it.maybe
Hi all,
Did anyone tried to install LXR on fedora 18/17?
I am following the manual, and starting the httpd service with no errors.
But browsing http://local/lxr does not show the lxr templates as expected.
rgs,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 21/02/2013 14:31, David wrote:
On 2/21/2013 5:28 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 02/18/2013 08:15 AM, jonc wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Am going to look into thisas I want to build a server at home,
and
On 2/21/2013 9:55 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 21/02/2013 14:31, David wrote:
On 2/21/2013 5:28 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 02/18/2013 08:15 AM, jonc wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
Am going to look into
Am 21.02.2013 15:55, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
Win2K is kinda' old.
No aero, no metro, relatively little bloat (by Windows standards)
and no security updates
what's not to like? :) Newest and most bleeding
edge isn't always the best
and use known vulnerable systems is always silly
On 21/02/2013 15:09, David wrote:
On 2/21/2013 9:55 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 21/02/2013 14:31, David wrote:
On 2/21/2013 5:28 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 02/18/2013 08:15 AM, jonc wrote:
On 02/18/2013 03:34 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 18:05 -0500, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
On 21/02/2013 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.02.2013 15:55, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
Win2K is kinda' old.
No aero, no metro, relatively little bloat (by Windows standards)
and no security updates
There are for another year and a bit. Do actually read up on the facts
before spewing
Am 21.02.2013 16:20, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 21/02/2013 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.02.2013 15:55, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
Win2K is kinda' old.
No aero, no metro, relatively little bloat (by Windows standards)
and no security updates
There are for another year and a bit
Is it required (or at least suggested) that multi-mastered directory server
instances have the equal values for dbcache and entry cache settings? If
so, what adverse effects result from not configuring the caches similarly?
Thanks,
pwr
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2/21/2013 10:17 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 21/02/2013 15:09, David wrote:
Win2K3 64-bit is almost the same as 64-bit XP. The least bad version of
Windows to date, IMO (not that the bar is particularly high).
XP was very similar to Win2K. However it was designed for home use.
Most, not
On 21 February 2013 15:46, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/21/2013 10:17 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 21/02/2013 15:09, David wrote:
Win2K3 64-bit is almost the same as 64-bit XP. The least bad version of
Windows to date, IMO (not that the bar is particularly high).
XP was very similar
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:12 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
Back in the early days, programmers spent the time and effort to
optimize their code because time is money and RAM was expensive.
And not there... On many personal computers, the limit to what you
could put into the computer could be quite
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:38 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and nobody needs NM for workstations with static IP's
Yes, and no. Yes, you don't need it. But it can still be useful.
Apart from the most obvious - static addresses being configured by your
central DHCP server, rather than each machine
Am 21.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Tim:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 22:38 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
and nobody needs NM for workstations with static IP's
Yes, and no. Yes, you don't need it. But it can still be useful.
Apart from the most obvious - static addresses being configured by your
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/20/2013 11:12 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 20 February 2013 17:28, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
After a month of asking how to get dual boot working, on this list, another
support list, in chat rooms, I have not had ONE SINGLE PERSON tell me that
they installed
Jim wrote:
F17 F18
I have finally figured out how to install F18 and saving my existing /home
partition, so as not to loose my home directory.
But I would be Damd to explain how in a email , I would just confuse the H out
of everyone and myself. the guy at Fedora that came up with this
Tim:
To a large degree, a Windows box is protected from the internet by
NAT in the router, ...
Dave Ihnat:
NAT is not a security protection. At best it's obfuscation.
Yes, I know. Poor choice of words, on my behalf. It's somewhat
buffered, in that NAT often gets in the way. But it's not
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:58:23 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 09:51 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
If multiple browsers are crashing it's likely that a plugin (such as
Flash or Java) is involved, since they're usually present in all of
them.
Try starting Firefox in
El mié, 20-02-2013 a las 09:39 -0500, Temlakos escribió:
Everyone:
I asked this before under a different heading, and no one answered.
I get a large volume of e-mail, and very often I interact with a site
that brings up a lot of message boxes, suggestion boxes (for
auto-filling from a
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:01:17 +0100, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
I recommend the OP to run
grub2-mkconfig -o /etc/grub2.cfg
Please don't! That's the wrong file. /etc/grub2.cfg is a symlink, but
grub2-mkconfig doesn't follow symlinks. It would replace the symlink with
the
On 21/02/2013 15:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.02.2013 16:20, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
On 21/02/2013 15:16, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.02.2013 15:55, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
Win2K is kinda' old.
No aero, no metro, relatively little bloat (by Windows standards)
and no security updates
On 21/02/2013 15:46, David wrote:
I would have happily put the drive into another machine running Linux,
mount it and try to salvage any important data of it, yes.
Really? Ignoring the Linux part if the drive was bad it could damage
another computer no matter what OS it was using.
If the
On 21/02/2013 16:17, Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:12 -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
Back in the early days, programmers spent the time and effort to
optimize their code because time is money and RAM was expensive.
And not there... On many personal computers, the limit to what you
could put
On 02/21/2013 08:27 AM, Patrick Raspante wrote:
Is it required (or at least suggested) that multi-mastered directory
server instances have the equal values for dbcache and entry cache
settings? If so, what adverse effects result from not configuring the
caches similarly?
There is a tool
Hi
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Frédéric Bron frederic.b...@m4x.orgwrote:
I have a fingerprint reader and F18. The fingerprint reader does not
seem to be installed automatically with F18.
Check whether your hardware is supported at all
Am 21.02.2013 18:31, schrieb Gordan Bobic:
Yeah, tell me about it. Even relatively recent Intel chipsets (e.g. X38/X48)
only supported up to 8GB of RAM
consumer crap if after 2010
Slightly earlier chipsets for the Core2 only supported up to 4GB,
of which you only usually got 3.5GB (I
I was mostly curious if the difference in cache configurations has any
negative effect on the integrity of the replication agreement between the
directory instances.
To illustrate, say one directory instance is managing several root suffixes
and has increased cache settings. The other instance
On 02/21/2013 07:09 AM, David wrote:
Win2K is 13 years old. No longer supported so no updates or security
patches. Since it cost in the neighborhood od $300 there is a strong
possibility it was a pirated copy. Which can be a security problem.
The OP referred to it as the latest and greatest,
On 02/21/2013 08:17 AM, Tim wrote:
And not there... On many personal computers, the limit to what you
could put into the computer could be quite low. Even on fairly recent
ones. I was given a 3 GHz 64 bit box that you can only put two one gig
memory sticks in. A very short sighted design.
On 2/21/2013 1:38 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/21/2013 07:09 AM, David wrote:
Win2K is 13 years old. No longer supported so no updates or security
patches. Since it cost in the neighborhood od $300 there is a strong
possibility it was a pirated copy. Which can be a security problem.
The OP
On 02/21/2013 11:06 AM, David wrote:
On 2/21/2013 1:38 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/21/2013 07:09 AM, David wrote:
Win2K is 13 years old. No longer supported so no updates or security
patches. Since it cost in the neighborhood od $300 there is a strong
possibility it was a pirated copy. Which can
On 2/21/2013 2:18 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/21/2013 11:06 AM, David wrote:
I'll try one, last time to make this clear to you: he was talking about
something that happened over a decade ago when Win2K *was* the latest
and greatest, not something that happened last month. What you now
I have a fingerprint reader and F18. The fingerprint reader does not
seem to be installed automatically with F18.
Check whether your hardware is supported at all
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/fprint/libfprint/Supported%20devices
It's not. One year ago, I installed ubuntu and could
Sorry for the title...but F18 is REALLY sick.
I posted under Freeze failures with F18 but no-one tried answered.
It just happened again. I installed kernel 3.7.9-201.fc18.x86_64. I was
able to
suspend twice - and it stops again. With the same error as before
Freezing user space processes
Lets be gratefull that NAT will be a thing of the past as soon as V6 will be
used more generally.
Just like accoustic coupled modems: once generally accepted and even state of
the art, now something for a museum -:)
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Tim
Are you sure you want to use F.P.?
I tried it several years ago, i ditched it because too many false negatives.
Van: Rahul Sundaram [mailto:methe...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: Thursday, February 21, 2013 06:59 PM W. Europe Standard Time
Aan: Community support for Fedora users
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
Thanks.
--
users mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/21/2013 07:23 AM, Roger wrote:
That is a permissive domain so actually nothing was being blocked by the
access. It should be fixed in the next update.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
On 21 February 2013 20:47, William Murray bill.mur...@cern.ch wrote:
Sorry for the title...but F18 is REALLY sick.
I posted under Freeze failures with F18 but no-one tried answered.
It just happened again. I installed kernel 3.7.9-201.fc18.x86_64. I was able
to
suspend twice - and it
On 02/21/13 08:01, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:21:28 +0100 poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 02/21/13 02:47, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:30:50 -0800 Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com
wrote:
On 02/20/2013 05:16 PM, Ranjan Maitra issued this missive:
On 20 February 2013 16:37, Beartooth bearto...@comcast.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:38:46 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
[]
You are not alone. I have similar problems with some boxes with Firefox
18 and Fedora 18 (Gnome). Some sites (including kernel.org) are moving
top after
On 02/21/13 10:39, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum
or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)?
No, but there's a better way! All of our spec files are available in git,
On 02/21/2013 11:17 PM, Quicksort wrote:
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
Thanks.
On 02/21/13 21:47, William Murray wrote:
Sorry for the title...but F18 is REALLY sick.
I posted under Freeze failures with F18 but no-one tried answered.
[…]
The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor
will light our distro and all who serve it - and the glow from
Dave Ihnat wrote:
To a large degree, a Windows box is protected from the internet by
NAT in the router, ...
NAT is not a security protection. At best it's obfuscation. And if
someone comes into a LAN via it's WAP, they're on the _inside_, so NAT
doesn't apply, and they're behind the router
On 02/21/13 13:06, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
On 02/19/2013 03:31 PM, poma wrote:
On 02/18/13 21:39, Reindl Harald wrote:
[…]
i would be thankful if even grub2-mkconfig would not create
this advanced submenu at all
Actually there is a patch proposal at 'grub-devel' by Prarit Bhargava,
for
Quicksort wrote:
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And what should I do if it does not ?
I have cron run yum -y --downloadonly
On 02/21/2013 06:49 AM, Lailah wrote:
El mié, 20-02-2013 a las 09:39 -0500, Temlakos escribió:
Everyone:
I asked this before under a different heading, and no one answered.
I get a large volume of e-mail, and very often I interact with a site
that brings up a lot of message boxes, suggestion
On 02/22/13 01:21, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:36 PM, poma wrote:
Shouldn't the default be an '-a'(anonymous) check out via git?
I think it should too. Maybe there are good reasons behind not making so.
Meanwhile you can do
$ yumdownloader --source pkgname
$ deco
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 19:26 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Quicksort wrote:
Platform: *Fedora 17 x64*
Hello everybody,
Usually, updates frequency is high. But for about one week, none.
How can I check my installed YUM (refresh-packagekit ?) still
correctly does its work ? And
On Feb 21, 2013 2:39 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:16:08PM -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to download a spec file using yum
or rpm only (without downloading the rpm)?
No, but there's a better way! All of our
Cool.guess I'll just wait for it to update when my software update
kicks in...
On Feb 20, 2013 9:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. eoconno...@gmail.com
wrote:
I kep receiving messages like this every now and thenI'm just
wondering.should I be concerned? Is there something I need to do to
I just updated F18 using yum. The updates
included NetworkManager-0.9.7.997-2.fc18.x86_64. This broke DNS client
services on my machine, i.e. I couldn' t browse, email, or do lookups on my
main machine, even though other local machines all continue to work. After
some head-scratching the problem
On 02/22/13 11:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I just updated F18 using yum. The updates included
NetworkManager-0.9.7.997-2.fc18.x86_64. This broke DNS client services on my
machine, i.e. I couldn' t browse, email, or do lookups on my main machine,
even though other local machines all
On Friday 22 February 2013 08:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I just updated F18 using yum. The updates
included NetworkManager-0.9.7.997-2.fc18.x86_64. This broke DNS client
services on my machine, i.e. I couldn' t browse, email, or do lookups
on my main machine, even though other local
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:21 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
On Friday 22 February 2013 08:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I just updated F18 using yum. The updates
included NetworkManager-0.9.7.997-2.fc18.x86_64. This broke DNS client
services on my machine, i.e. I couldn' t browse, email, or do
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
[egreshko@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.0.1
You've downgraded NetworkManager to confirm it fixes the issue?
Downgrading threw up some dependency issues which I couldn't be bothered
On 02/22/13 13:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
[egreshko@localhost ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 192.168.0.1
You've downgraded NetworkManager to confirm it fixes the issue?
Downgrading threw up some
On 02/22/13 13:34, Ed Greshko wrote:
(I wish I could remember) one package
Oh, it was apper. It stopped putting a notice in systray of KDE when updates
were available.
--
From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all spelling an
grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest
On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:41 +0200, Kevin Wilson wrote:
The same is with my desktop - can only be waken up from
suspend by the power-on button.
With desktop computers, you may be able to do something about it. If
there are BIOS options, or motherboard jumpers, to change the power
supply options
Are you sure you want to use F.P.?
I tried it several years ago, i ditched it because too many false negatives.
I agree it is just for fun! But I had not many false negatives when I
tried it with ubuntu.
Frédéric
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
Hi,
We having new HP Z820 workstation. Which have Intel 82574L
82579LM gigabit network card.
While booting in Fedora 15 it just stuck. Following are output in Fedora
17 (where system boot with success.)
[root@localhost ldap_newhp]# lspci -nn | grep -i eth
00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]:
Hi,
While configuring LDAP client authentication on Fedora 16/17, I am testing
this on Fedora 16 17. I have install openldap-clients nss_ldap . I am
facing following problem.
I have done configuration by following this
urlhttp://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=Fedora_17p=ldapf=2
[1]
Just to
72 matches
Mail list logo
