Hi,
I'm wondering what is the status of multiseat in fedora 20... A while ago,
Lennart Poettering said [1] that some USB 2 docking station [2] work out of
the box on fedora 17, which is awesome but:
* Is this kind of setup still supported on fedora 20 (I sure hope it is,
loginctl seems to still h
I have 554 words in the following file one word per line.
Some words are repeated up to 3 times.
words.list
If I try "cat words.list | uniq -u"
It dumps all repeated words, I need one copy of all words.
uniq words.list > uniq.list
Words are still duplicated.
sort words.list | uniq
leaves abou
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014, Frank Murphy wrote:
> I have 554 words in the following file one word per line.
> Some words are repeated up to 3 times.
>
> words.list
>
> If I try "cat words.list | uniq -u"
> It dumps all repeated words, I need one copy of all words.
>
> uniq words.list > uniq.list
> Words
On 02/15/2014 09:57 PM, Sean Darcy wrote:
I'm trying to connect to a windows guest on an F19 host from an F19 client.
remote-viewer spice://10.10.11.100:5972
(remote-viewer:19994): GSpice-WARNING **: Could not connect to
10.10.11.100: Connection refused
xml for the guest has:
Not sure how y
Hi Frank,
I just created a quick test file and sort -u didn't quite work for me
(technically it should do what you are asking) but then I realised that I
had invisible spaces after some of the words and so they were not deemed
uniquely different by the system. Perhaps you are having the same issue
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tahir Hafiz wrote:
> cat words.txt | tr " " "\n" | sort -u
tr -d [:space:] < words.txt | sort -u
poc
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora
> I have 554 words in the following file one word per line.
> Some words are repeated up to 3 times.
>
> words.list
>
> If I try "cat words.list | uniq -u"
> It dumps all repeated words, I need one copy of all words.
uniq removes duplicates only if they are adjacent:
"Note: 'uniq' does not detect
I am having problems with Firefox and Thunderbird (Tbird crashed hard the other
day), and I thought I'd run yum update (auto-notification is pretty flaky in
Mate) before reinstalling both of them. It seems that yum is broken also. I
keep getting the following message:
[root@otis yumsql]# yu
I found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#hawkey_package,
but couldn't make much of it, since it is written for a much more
technically sophisticated audience that I'll ever be.
I gather that dnf is a fork of yum, meant to be or to become a
replacement for it. But I do
dnf should work just fine with F20 (it does, for me), but note that it
does not do delta rpm downloads. Other than that, it is pretty stable.
Ranjan
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:38:19 + Beartooth
wrote:
>
> I found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF#hawkey_package,
> but couldn't
On 02/17/14 03:16, Sean Darcy wrote:
> And, on F19 host:
> libvirt-1.1.3.2-1.fc19.x86_64
> qemu-1.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
>
> And from the log file on the host:
>
> -spice port=5972,addr=127.0.0.1,disable-ticketing,seamless-migration=on
I am not a spice user or a remote-viewer
But, on the F19 hos
On 02/16/2014 05:13 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/17/14 03:16, Sean Darcy wrote:
And, on F19 host:
libvirt-1.1.3.2-1.fc19.x86_64
qemu-1.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64
And from the log file on the host:
-spice port=5972,addr=127.0.0.1,disable-ticketing,seamless-migration=on
I am not a spice user or a remote-
Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
> dnf should work just fine with F20 (it does, for me), but note that it
> does not do delta rpm downloads. Other than that, it is pretty stable.
It does now, but it's disabled by default. To enable, add "deltarpm=true" to
/etc/dnf/dnf.conf. (See the dnf.conf man
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:38:19 + (UTC), Beartooth wrote:
> I have one F20 box that seems to be having endless trouble with
> NetworkManager, openswan, and libreswan (whatever the latter two may be);
> what hope is there that dnf will straighten them out sooner and better
> than yum has
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:01:47 + Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra inbox.com> writes:
>
> > dnf should work just fine with F20 (it does, for me), but note that it
> > does not do delta rpm downloads. Other than that, it is pretty stable.
>
> It does now, but it's disabled by default. To
Hello,
I've got a Linode running fc17. I'd like to update it to fc20. I'm
wondering if it's possible to do this upgrade from fc17 to fc20
without doing a complete reinstall? I've got several services that I'd
very much not like to have to reconfigure from scratch on the new
system.
Thanks.
Dave.
I've got a project in which I'll be making many dozens of DVDs from
other media, and I thought it'd be really cool to use LightScribe to
label the discs.
well, I come to discover that LightScribe seems to have gone out of
fashion, and I can't find suitable software anywhere.
LaCie used to distrib
On 02/16/2014 08:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I've got a project in which I'll be making many dozens of DVDs from
other media, and I thought it'd be really cool to use LightScribe to
label the discs.
well, I come to discover that LightScribe seems to have gone out of
fashion, and I can't find suitab
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:35:25 -0500
Fred Smith wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a site that may still have it? (or other
> suitable substitute).
I found light scribe labels to be almost utterly invisible
and really pitiful looking when I tried it once a long time
ago (using the LaCie software which
Finally made time to try your suggestions.
All went OK until I got to the reload stage when it complained about a bunch
of 32-bit dependencies.
I changed the rpm -Uhv command to restrict it to 64-bit rpm's but still get:
warning: python-2.7.3-7.2.fc17.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
On 02/16/2014 09:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:35:25 -0500
> Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> Can anyone point me to a site that may still have it? (or other
>> suitable substitute).
>
> I found light scribe labels to be almost utterly invisible
> and really pitiful looking when I trie
On 02/16/2014 09:35 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
I've got a project in which I'll be making many dozens of DVDs from
other media, and I thought it'd be really cool to use LightScribe to
label the discs.
well, I come to discover that LightScribe seems to have gone out of
fashion, and I can't find suitab
On 02/16/2014 10:10 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 02/16/2014 09:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:35:25 -0500
Fred Smith wrote:
Can anyone point me to a site that may still have it? (or other
suitable substitute).
I found light scribe labels to be almost utterly invisible
and rea
On 02/16/2014 09:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:35:25 -0500
Fred Smith wrote:
Can anyone point me to a site that may still have it? (or other
suitable substitute).
I found light scribe labels to be almost utterly invisible
and really pitiful looking when I tried it once a lon
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Davies wrote:
> Finally made time to try your suggestions.
>
> All went OK until I got to the reload stage when it complained about a bunch
> of 32-bit dependencies.
>
> I changed the rpm -Uhv command to restrict it to 64-bit rpm's but still get:
Oops, sor
Got there!! :-))
As well as hiding everything pythonesque in /usr/local, I had to do the same
with /usr/lib and then force-load the basic pythin RPMs.
Then I had to manually download five more RPMs before I could rpm -Uhv --force
--nodeps python* to get the python requirements for yum and fedup
On 02/16/2014 06:49 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Infinitely better looking labels can be made with inkjet
printable media and an inkjet printer that supports
media printing (which my Epson Artisan does, though I have
to run the software in a virtual windows machine).
You might want to consider using
On Feb 15, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 03:15:13PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> What's the basis for a "two years out" assessment? I'm not finding a
>> related FOSDEM or DevConf session where this was discussed. Has anyone who
>> was present for these conver
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:25:59 -0500
David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a Linode running fc17. I'd like to update it to fc20. I'm
> wondering if it's possible to do this upgrade from fc17 to fc20
> without doing a complete reinstall?
Yes and NO,
You cannot go F17 > F20 in one step. (# 2 r
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:49:37 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Infinitely better looking labels can be made with inkjet
> printable media and an inkjet printer that supports
> media printing (which my Epson Artisan does, though I have
> to run the software in a virtual windows machine).
My HP Photosmar
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:38:29 +
"Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Tahir Hafiz
> wrote:
> > cat words.txt | tr " " "\n" | sort -u
>
> tr -d [:space:] < words.txt | sort -u
>
> poc
Thanks for that,
sometimes it's the character you don't see.
___
Regards
Frank
31 matches
Mail list logo
