Allegedly, on or about 28 November 2015, Bob Goodwin sent:
> [bobg@Box10 ~]$ rpm -e --test gkrellm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> gkrellm >= 2.2.0 is needed by (installed)
> gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-18.fc23.x86_64
>
> I guess the --test stops it from actually erasing anything?
That's the idea.
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 22:02 -0500, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On one of my machines:
> >
> > # cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep Hz
> > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 560 @ 2.67GHz
> > cpu MHz : 2667.000
> > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 560 @ 2.67GHz
> > cp
This is just an FYI and I am not seeking a resolution to it.
While running dnf update, I sometimes get output lines like
/var/cache/dnf/updates-d28e3be95240972f/packages/[APP NAME].drpm: md5
mismatch of result
APP NAME can happen to be any app - so it is a random thing
rather on some particul
I think I'm running into this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439598
Whenever I restart firefox the language used for spelling reverts back to the
previous value of English(Malawi) even though I change it to en-US.
Also when restarting Firefox I get the message saying that I haven'
Hi,
Is it possible to encrypt a /home partition on F23 without losing the data? If
so, what is the recommended method?
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate
On 11/29/2015 12:25 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Is it possible to encrypt a /home partition on F23 without losing the
data? If so, what is the recommended method?
Possible, yes. Supported? No.
http://www.johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc/
If you trust the author, you might be able to convert a
Gordon Messmer writes:
On 11/29/2015 12:25 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Is it possible to encrypt a /home partition on F23 without losing the
data? If so, what is the recommended method?
Possible, yes. Supported? No.
http://www.johannes-bauer.com/linux/luksipc/
If you trust the author, you mi
Please remember to make backups and more backups. Perhaps also a
second user account with a copy of your stuff in case this goes
really, really bad.
There's a caution at the top of the page that this page has been
marked 'old' so proceed with caution.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Disk_Encryptio
On 11/29/2015 01:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead
of LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical
use cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added. I would expect
that, with most use cases, people ins
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:19:51 -0800 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 01:19 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> > I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead
> > of LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical
> > use cases, LVM brings absolutely nothi
Hi all,
I have the fedora 23 installed on a machine with UEFI BIOS, and secure
boot enabled; after you installed VirtualBox 5.0 on this machine, I
create the VM's normally, but when I go to install, I get an error
message saying that vboxdrv can not be loaded; I used the link below
and the install
On 11/29/2015 04:22 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I do have backups in place, but I don't really want to have to go
back to them (one of the partitions has 367 GB of data, the other has
100 GB). At the least, it will be disruptive.
Disruption is unavoidable. The tool I described earlier might be ab
On 11/29/2015 04:41 PM, Celso Viana wrote:
How do I solve this problem without having to disable secure boot?
Enroll your own key and sign the modules.
Secure boot requires signatures all along the line: the firmware, the
boot loader, the kernel, and the modules.
https://access.redhat.com/d
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:08:25 -0800 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 04:22 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I do have backups in place, but I don't really want to have to go
> > back to them (one of the partitions has 367 GB of data, the other has
> > 100 GB). At the least, it will be disruptive
Ranjan Maitra writes:
Thanks! Btw, either way, is it possible to encrypt a non-LVM partition? As I
Yes, and I mentioned the fact that I did just that, earlier in this thread.
pgpfdZl_6H1qb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 20:29:47 -0500 Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Ranjan Maitra writes:
>
> > Thanks! Btw, either way, is it possible to encrypt a non-LVM partition? As I
>
> Yes, and I mentioned the fact that I did just that, earlier in this thread.
>
Yes, you did. but I was not clear because the
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 17:08:25 -0800 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 11/29/2015 04:22 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I do have backups in place, but I don't really want to have to go
> > back to them (one of the partitions has 367 GB of data, the other has
> > 100 GB). At the least, it will be disruptive
On 11/29/2015 05:59 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Thanks! I was wondering about this some more. Can I not put this tool
luksipc on a LiveCD and then compile and run it from there? Then the
actual disks would be "offline", isn't that correct?
Yes, but you don't really need to do that. You just need
Hello,
I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS encryption of
existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I am running into
some errors. The trouble is that the file does not come with a make install in
the Makefile: thus the executable is not moved to t
I would like to know know to remove compiz from mate desktop in fedora
23
--
William Biggs
bbi...@fastmail.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: htt
On 29.11.2015, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I really don't understand why Fedora is still foisting all the overhead of
> LVM on everyone, by default. I would tend to think that for typical use
> cases, LVM brings absolutely nothing value-added.
I'd like to second that!
Mentioned the same issue here
21 matches
Mail list logo
