Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/21/16 00:38, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 03/19/2016 08:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> On 03/20/16 09:38, jd1008 wrote: >>> it belches out: >>> Error getting authority: Error initializing authority: Could not connect: >>> No such file >>> or directory (g-io-error-quark, 1) >>> . >>> . >>> . >>>

network printing broken

>From my desktop, I am now unable to print to a printer that is attached to another host on my network. The error I see in the journal is: Mar 20 15:28:49 cobweb.gregandeva.net cupsd[5648]: Set job-printer-state-message to "No destination host name supplied by cups-browsed for printer \"epson\",

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/20/2016 12:37 PM, Greg Woods wrote: On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:37 AM, jd1008 > wrote: think I will soon have to change the OS'es on my machines. Good luck with that. Even Debian has gone to systemd. It will be increasingly hard to run

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:37 AM, jd1008 wrote: > think I will soon have to change the OS'es on my machines. Good luck with that. Even Debian has gone to systemd. It will be increasingly hard to run any kind of modern Linux distro while avoiding systemd. --Greg -- users

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/20/2016 11:30 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 10:38 -0600, jd1008 wrote: It would be useful if you are seeing issues transitioning from one target to another to get the journal from the attempts to do so. By the way, I just searched /var/log for the phrase "Error

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 10:38 -0600, jd1008 wrote: > > It would be useful if you are seeing issues transitioning from one  > > target to another to get the journal from the attempts to do so. > By the way, I just searched /var/log for the phrase "Error getting  > authority" > and got no hits: > $

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/20/2016 10:49 AM, Jon Ingason wrote: sudo journalctl -xb | grep -i "Error getting authority" # journalctl -xb | grep -i "Error getting authority" # That's all it wrote :) -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

Den 2016-03-20 kl. 17:38, skrev jd1008: > > > On 03/20/2016 10:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> >> On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 > > wrote: >> >> >> It would be useful if you are seeing issues transitioning from one >> target to another to get

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/19/2016 08:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/20/16 09:38, jd1008 wrote: it belches out: Error getting authority: Error initializing authority: Could not connect: No such file or directory (g-io-error-quark, 1) . . . a few more lines about some other activity ... and the system does not

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 20 March 2016 at 16:20, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 03/20/2016 10:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > >> >> On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 jd1...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote: >> >> >> On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote: >>

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/20/2016 10:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 > wrote: On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:38, jd1008 wrote: <> SO

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/20/2016 10:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 > wrote: On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:38, jd1008 wrote: <> SO

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 20 March 2016 at 16:08, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote: > >> >> On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote: >> >>> On 03/19/16 20:38, jd1008 wrote: >>> <> >>> SO how can I debug this, or is this the normal behavior? If normal, since which release? --

Re: init 5 from single user mode fails

On 03/19/2016 08:37 PM, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:52, g wrote: On 03/19/16 20:38, jd1008 wrote: <> SO how can I debug this, or is this the normal behavior? If normal, since which release? -- because you booted to level 1, not all that is needed for xwindows has been loaded. if you init 3,

Re: conflict installing i686 version of "qt" on x86_64

Christian Groessler wrote: > But isn't this a bug that I can have krb5-libs-1.14.1-1 and > krb5-libs-1.14-9 installed at the same time? Yes, but that can happen for a variety of real-life reasons, but usually by updates installing and the transaction getting aborted/terminated early, either by

[389-users] Re: test email - please ignore.

Ignoring. Striker On 03/17/2016 02:51 PM, Viktor Ashirov wrote: > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@%(host_name)s > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s

Re: seamonkey

It seems now in the testing level for all fedora versions === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale

Re: btrfs doesn't support filesystem swap

| From: Rick Stevens | Keep in mind that SuSE is not based in the United States and can, if | they so choose, thumb their noses at US patent and copyright law. Red | Hat IS based in the US and cannot (well, will not) knowingly violate US | law. 1. US has a nasty habit of

Re: btrfs doesn't support filesystem swap

On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 14:40 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > On that note, is Fedora going to offer native ZFS any time soon? I > know Ubuntu 16.04 will release with it native. IIRC that's not going to happen as long as ZFS is under the Oracle license. poc -- users mailing list

Re: how long is this going to be broke??

And it's 'broken', not 'broke'. It's the internet, man, use proper English. Geez. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Jack Craig > wrote: > >> >> > Looks like a 3rd party repository based

Re: Go back to standard kernel, after using rawhide kernel

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:02:06 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > On 03/17/2016 11:41 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> >> Remove kernel (and kernel-core, kernel-modules, kernel-devel, etc.) for >> version 4.5.0-0.rc7.git2.2.fc25. Then you should be able to perform a >> "dnf install" for a Fedora 23 kernel.