Re: USB issues in fedora-27 ("can't get device qualifier: Resource temporarily unavailable") not happening when booted into CentOS-6.2, same hardware

On 03/30/18 10:29, Tom Hodder wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been having a bunch of trouble with the USB ports on my desktop, in > particular > the webcam doesn't work and there are lots of errors in the output > of *"lsusb > -v"* when

USB issues in fedora-27 ("can't get device qualifier: Resource temporarily unavailable") not happening when booted into CentOS-6.2, same hardware

Hi All, I've been having a bunch of trouble with the USB ports on my desktop, in particular the webcam doesn't work and there are lots of errors in the output of *"lsusb -v"* when I try to debug. (I get the "can't get device

Re: empty messages from fedora users list. [CLOSED]

Allegedly, on or about 29 March 2018, home user via users sent: > Earlier this afternoon, from Thunderbird running on a windows-7 box, > I sent 2 messages from yahoo account #1 to yahoo account #2, each > with different few-megabyte (not mega-pixel) picture attached. I > also sent 1 message from

Re: Sharing USB Serial data with 2 processes ?

On 03/29/2018 03:16 PM, linux guy wrote: Hi. I've got a USB serial device that supplies data to a process via /dev/ttyUSB0. I need to use the same data for a 2nd, independent process.  I have code for both processes and can make changes, but I would prefer not to. Is there a way that both

Re: empty messages from fedora users list. [CLOSED]

Earlier this afternoon, from Thunderbird running on a windows-7 box, I sent 2 messages from yahoo account #1 to yahoo account #2, each with different few-megabyte (not mega-pixel) picture attached. I also sent 1 message from yahoo account #1 to yahoo account #3; it had one few-megabyte picture

Sharing USB Serial data with 2 processes ?

Hi. I've got a USB serial device that supplies data to a process via /dev/ttyUSB0. I need to use the same data for a 2nd, independent process. I have code for both processes and can make changes, but I would prefer not to. Is there a way that both processes can use the same serial USB data

Re: Administrivia: DMARC mitigations enabled -- applies to Yahoo addresses, at least (was Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.)

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:49:28 -0400 Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Would this change be why I'm suddenly seeing oodles of old messages > > showing up on the list? Messages that I've already seen, since I > > don't have a problem with messages from yahoo addresses being > > invisible.

Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.

___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Administrivia: DMARC mitigations enabled -- applies to Yahoo addresses, at least (was Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.)

On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:49:28 -0400 Todd Zullinger wrote: > This shouldn't be related to that. All it does is change > the From: field of messages sent from domains with very > strict DMARC policies, so that they use the list address. > The sender name is kept, with 'via

Re: Administrivia: DMARC mitigations enabled -- applies to Yahoo addresses, at least (was Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.)

stan wrote: > On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:27:40 -0400 > Todd Zullinger wrote: >> As we've discussed in this thread and others recently, >> messages from subscribers @yahoo.com do not reach >> subscribers @gmail.com (among others). This is due to an >> aggressive policy set by Yahoo

Re: Administrivia: DMARC mitigations enabled -- applies to Yahoo addresses, at least (was Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.)

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 17:27:40 -0400 Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi all, > > As we've discussed in this thread and others recently, > messages from subscribers @yahoo.com do not reach > subscribers @gmail.com (among others). This is due to an > aggressive policy set by Yahoo which

Re: HYPERKITTY does not show messages parts being addressed in replies.

On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 08:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 03/29/18 08:01, Stephen Perkins wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan > > wrote: > > > As I understand it, the problem is not that Gmail marks it as spam > > > (which you could recover from