On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:19 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create
> additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can
> Linux-based SMTP servers do that?
Shared folders would be a feature of an IMAP
On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 07:44:14 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Well, there is your problem. You need to check your /etc/exports file.
Yea, it is insanely picky about exports. If you mention a
system name it can't resolve, it refuses to do anything instead
of just ignoring the one system. Several times
On 07/20/18 07:36, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> .
> [root@ASRock-J3455M bobg]# systemctl status nfs
> ● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services
> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled; vendor
> preset: disabled)
> Drop-In: /run/systemd/generator/nfs-server.service.d
On 07/19/18 18:25, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/20/18 05:58, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 07/19/18 17:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
The server is a Fedora system, yes? And, has it been rebooted?
.
Fedora 27 and 28, rebooted several times today ...
I probably should have mentioned doing:
[root@Box10 86data]#
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:16:46 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I have all the usual connections through my LAN but can not mount the
> NFS4 server
I've sometimes had individual systems get into some strange
state where an NFS server doesn't like them (but is fine with
other systems). Short of a reboot
On 07/20/18 05:58, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 07/19/18 17:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> The server is a Fedora system, yes? And, has it been rebooted?
> .
> Fedora 27 and 28, rebooted several times today ...
>
> I probably should have mentioned doing:
>
> [root@Box10 86data]# ss -t -l -n
> State
On 07/19/2018 03:15 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 07/19/2018 10:38 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
It is possible to get yourself in trouble if you have more than one EFI
partition. My two were on the same drive; I don't know if that makes a
difference. But what happened to me was, after the first time I
On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 00:18 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Rick Stevens wrote:
> > > Note that at the time I did this (geeze, like 15 years ago), things
> > > like Gmail, Office 365 and many of the other cloud-based email
> > > systems did not exist. We had to roll our own. Would I do it again?
>
On 07/20/18 05:16, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I had a power interruption this morning, everything is on UPS's but we are
> raising
> a new puppy who gets into everythingit seems.
>
> I have all the usual connections through my LAN but can not mount the NFS4
> server,
> /can ssh and sftp to it.
I had a power interruption this morning, everything is on UPS's but we
are raising a new puppy who gets into everythingit seems.
I have all the usual connections through my LAN but can not mount the
NFS4 server, /can ssh and sftp to it. //I/'ve tried what I can think of,
it doesn't seem to be
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 07/19/2018 10:38 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> what happened to me was, after the first time I booted
> > Windows 10 after installing Fedora, I could no longer boot Linux
>
> I expect that was Microsoft forcing the EFI "BootOrder' to give them
On 07/19/2018 10:38 AM, Greg Woods wrote:
> It is possible to get yourself in trouble if you have more than one EFI
> partition. My two were on the same drive; I don't know if that makes a
> difference. But what happened to me was, after the first time I booted
> Windows 10 after installing
It is possible to get yourself in trouble if you have more than one EFI
partition. My two were on the same drive; I don't know if that makes a
difference. But what happened to me was, after the first time I booted
Windows 10 after installing Fedora, I could no longer boot Linux, it just
went
On 07/18/2018 05:06 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/18/2018 02:53 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> I have a disk where I wish to have 2 OS on 2 different partitions
>> Do I need 2 EFI System Partition (Boot). I guess that one is enough.
>> I just want to be sure.
>
> You only need one. That's one of
On 07/19/2018 08:55 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:12:12 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What model router?
It is an ASUS RT-AC5300
https://tomhorsley.com/hardware/rt-ac5300/rt-ac5300.html
(from the way the router is positioned you can also
deduce I'm not married :-).
What
Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Note that at the time I did this (geeze, like 15 years ago), things
>> like Gmail, Office 365 and many of the other cloud-based email
>> systems did not exist. We had to roll our own. Would I do it again?
>> If we needed complete control of things or our email
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 08:12:12 -0400
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> What model router?
It is an ASUS RT-AC5300
https://tomhorsley.com/hardware/rt-ac5300/rt-ac5300.html
(from the way the router is positioned you can also
deduce I'm not married :-).
> What services? First place I would look at is DHCPD
On 07/19/2018 07:42 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:36:30 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
I guess I'll see if it happens again, or was just a one time thing.
It did OK for 1 night, then I found it crashed again this
morning, and the router crashed the same way as well.
I'm booted
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:36:30 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I guess I'll see if it happens again, or was just a one time thing.
It did OK for 1 night, then I found it crashed again this
morning, and the router crashed the same way as well.
I'm booted back on the 4.16.16-300.fc28.x86_64 kernel now
On 19/07/18 11:00, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/19/18 17:58, John Pilkington wrote:
On 19/07/18 10:15, Frank Elsner wrote:
Hello,
on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
# dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on
Looks like today is a day to skip updating...
On 07/19/2018 06:29 AM, Frank Elsner wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:55:11 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
[ ... ]
You could either wait a day or so or do the following
State "waiting" entered. Thanks.
Cheers,
Frank
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:55:11 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
[ ... ]
> You could either wait a day or so or do the following
State "waiting" entered. Thanks.
Cheers,
Frank
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 07/19/18 17:58, John Pilkington wrote:
> On 19/07/18 10:15, Frank Elsner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
>>
>> # dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu 19 Jul 2018
On 07/19/18 17:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/19/18 17:15, Frank Elsner wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
>>
>> # dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu 19 Jul 2018 11:12:27 AM
On 19/07/18 10:15, Frank Elsner wrote:
Hello,
on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
# dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu 19 Jul 2018 11:12:27 AM CEST.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: package
On 07/19/18 17:15, Frank Elsner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
>
> # dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu 19 Jul 2018 11:12:27 AM
> CEST.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
>
Hello,
on my fully updated F27 system todays "dnf update --refresh" gave the error
# dnf update --refresh --exclude="kernel*"
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on Thu 19 Jul 2018 11:12:27 AM CEST.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: package
27 matches
Mail list logo
