On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:45:16 -0700 stan via users
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:12:43 -0600
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Amusing, but how do I get this system to not believe that it is
> > living in the past?
>
>
> Grab the repos and gpg-keys packages from here,
> https://koji.fedoraproject.o
On 2019-12-27 09:21, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:12:43 -0600
> Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
>> Amusing, but how do I get this system to not believe that it is living in
>> the past?
>>
>> This is my fourth upgraded system, three today, but this is the one with the
>> issues.
> I suppose
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 08:19:47PM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:47:20 -0800
> Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>
> > or just use enp6s1 and
> > enp4s0 for the bridge and not bother renaming them
>
> Resistance is futile :-). I turn off all the renaming junk
> on systems with just on
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:12:43 -0600
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Amusing, but how do I get this system to not believe that it is
> living in the past?
Grab the repos and gpg-keys packages from here,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1399456
and update them using
dnf -C update [pac
On 12/26/19 4:47 PM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The bridge is supposed to bridge enp4s0 (it was being named lan1 prior to the
upgrade to F31) and enp6s1 (was lan2 prior to F31 upgrade).
The messages are for my enp4s0, but it has no IP address. This is via my
iptables setup. I assume this is happen
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:12:43 -0600
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Amusing, but how do I get this system to not believe that it is living in the
> past?
>
> This is my fourth upgraded system, three today, but this is the one with the
> issues.
I suppose you could copy the updated repo files from one of
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:47:20 -0800
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> or just use enp6s1 and
> enp4s0 for the bridge and not bother renaming them
Resistance is futile :-). I turn off all the renaming junk
on systems with just one interface so I can continue to get
eth0, but I gave up on systems with mult
Dear friends,
I upgraded my F30 system today using:
sudo dnf upgrade --releasever 31
Worked "fine" but for the following:
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/lvm2-monitor-service-runs-endlessly-on-startup/4370
Duly fixed with:
sudo systemctl mask lvm2-monitor.service
System came up after the se
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:02:03AM -0500, sean darcy wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1777893
>
I hit this too trying to use the ifcfg- files, per the email with subject
"network bridge does not get an IP address".
I see no failure in the dmesg file you attached to that bu
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:19:28AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/26/19 8:42 AM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> > I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
> >
> > [umbrella network-scripts]$ more ifcfg-br0
> > DEVICE=br0
> > TYPE=Bridge
> > IPADDR=192.168.1.1
> > NETMASK=255.255.255
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 2:56 PM Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> Oh yes, one more thing. If you do the RAID1 thing: either make a shiny
> new RAID1 and copy to it, or practice the transition with test drives.
> Do not risk your high value data by trying to "in place RAID1" it.
I'm not sure if this is e
On 12/26/19 8:42 AM, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
[umbrella network-scripts]$ more ifcfg-br0
DEVICE=br0
TYPE=Bridge
IPADDR=192.168.1.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
It seems odd that there's no default route in that configuration.
Bring up the networ
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 12:48 PM Javier Perez wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have my /home partition on a 2TB HDD drive about half full. Should be doing
> regular backups but not in the habit.
>
> What is better?
> A. Purchase a second 2TB to create a Raid1 mirror or
> B. Purchase a second 4TB drive for backu
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 10:41 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The wiki page is:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
>
Thanks.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to user
Hi -
Upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 31, and I'm unable to get my network bridge
working.
Any ideas on how to get this working?
I saw the other posts about adding MACADDR, but I'm not using DHCP and I don't
care
what MAC address is used.
I have a fixed IP address in my network script, this:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2019 at 11:42, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I think I'm still not getting my point across. It might be convenient
> > to have a centralised place for users to request packages, and
> > currently there isn't (you've mentioned a Wiki page sev
Hi Patrick,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I think I'm still not getting my point across. It might be convenient
> to have a centralised place for users to request packages, and
> currently there isn't (you've mentioned a Wiki page several times but
> not provided a URL, so maybe this already exists
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 09:40 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:45 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > Obviously. The point I'm attempting to make is that there seems to be
> > no standard way for non-developers to request a package, which is what
> > the OP is tryi
Hi
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:45 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>
> Obviously. The point I'm attempting to make is that there seems to be
> no standard way for non-developers to request a package, which is what
> the OP is trying to do. That could be intentional or it could be an
> oversight, but
19 matches
Mail list logo
