Re: DNF Not Resolving Kernel Package

2020-03-10 Thread sixpack13
On 11.03.20 05:15, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/10/20 9:12 PM, sixpack13 wrote: maybe (?!) sudo dnf localinstall ./rtl8812au-kmod-4.3.14-2.x86_64.rpm From "man dnf":    Localinstall Command   Deprecated alias for the Install Command. Okay, something learned. THX -- sixpack13

Re: DNF Not Resolving Kernel Package

2020-03-10 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/10/20 9:12 PM, sixpack13 wrote: maybe (?!) sudo dnf localinstall ./rtl8812au-kmod-4.3.14-2.x86_64.rpm From "man dnf": Localinstall Command Deprecated alias for the Install Command. ___ users mailing list --

Re: DNF Not Resolving Kernel Package

2020-03-10 Thread sixpack13
On 11.03.20 04:32, Jamie Fargen wrote: When installing an RPM compiled from source, seeing and error and it doesn't look like the dnf is resolving the kernel package. # dnf install rtl8812au-kmod-4.3.14-2.x86_64.rpm kernel-5.5.7-200.fc31.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:17:25 ago on

Re: DNF Not Resolving Kernel Package

2020-03-10 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/10/20 8:32 PM, Jamie Fargen wrote: When installing an RPM compiled from source, seeing and error and it doesn't look like the dnf is resolving the kernel package. # dnf install rtl8812au-kmod-4.3.14-2.x86_64.rpm kernel-5.5.7-200.fc31.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:17:25 ago on

DNF Not Resolving Kernel Package

2020-03-10 Thread Jamie Fargen
When installing an RPM compiled from source, seeing and error and it doesn't look like the dnf is resolving the kernel package. # dnf install rtl8812au-kmod-4.3.14-2.x86_64.rpm kernel-5.5.7-200.fc31.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:17:25 ago on Tue 10 Mar 2020 10:09:05 PM EDT. Package

Re: prep. for upgrade.

2020-03-10 Thread home user
(On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 6:56 PM, Patrick wrote) > ...The recommended way to upgrade is with dnf, ... That's how I do it, just as the on-line instructions say.  I'm not doing a new installation. > I think you're mistaken. ... I hope you're correct!  What I originally said was merely a personal

Re: prep. for upgrade.

2020-03-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 13:58 -0600, home user wrote: > I plan to upgrade to f31 in about a month. I looked thru the > instructions for the upgrade. I know that beforehand, > * I should do a back-up, and > * that I should download the Fedora Workstation Live image to a USB stick. Sounds like

[389-users] Re: Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread William Brown
> On 11 Mar 2020, at 06:00, Matthew Aguirre > wrote: > > Is there a way to disable unsecured use of port 389? I am using FreeIPA, so > the client setup uses port 389 with TLS and that is fine, but I'd like to be > able to not allow unsecured connections as much as possible. > > I was able

[389-users] Re: Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread Vandenburgh, Steve Y
Also note that if your directory requires authentication before any data will be returned, you can use the require secure bind option (http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-require-secure-binds.html) to force authentication over SSL first. In effect, no data will be returned over the

[389-users] Re: Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread Patrick M Landry
I don't know if this will be of any help to you but here are the instructions for RHDS 9. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/9.0/html/administration_guide/secureconnections#requiring-secure-connections

[389-users] Re: Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 3/10/20 4:07 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Matthew Aguirre wrote: Is there a way to disable unsecured use of port 389?  I am using FreeIPA, so the client setup uses port 389 with TLS and that is fine, but I'd like to be able to not allow unsecured connections as much as possible. I was able to

[389-users] Re: Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread Rob Crittenden
Matthew Aguirre wrote: > Is there a way to disable unsecured use of port 389?  I am using > FreeIPA, so the client setup uses port 389 with TLS and that is fine, > but I'd like to be able to not allow unsecured connections as much > as possible. > > I was able to do this in OpenLdap, but haven't

Re: prep. for upgrade.

2020-03-10 Thread sixpack13
On 10.03.20 20:58, home user wrote: stand-alone home workstation; f30; dual-boot (with windows-7); Gnome (mainly). I plan to upgrade to f31 in about a month. ... just wait 11 days further, go for F32 and have more fun No ? -- sixpack13 ___ users

[389-users] Force use of secure connections

2020-03-10 Thread Matthew Aguirre
Is there a way to disable unsecured use of port 389? I am using FreeIPA, so the client setup uses port 389 with TLS and that is fine, but I'd like to be able to not allow unsecured connections as much as possible. I was able to do this in OpenLdap, but haven't seen a comparable solution in

prep. for upgrade.

2020-03-10 Thread home user
stand-alone home workstation; f30; dual-boot (with windows-7); Gnome (mainly). I plan to upgrade to f31 in about a month. I looked thru the instructions for the upgrade. I know that beforehand, * I should do a back-up, and * that I should download the Fedora Workstation Live image to a USB

detect bluetooth mouse connecting?

2020-03-10 Thread Tom Horsley
I always need to run some ximput commands when my bluetooth mouse connects, I'm wondering if I can automagically detect the mouse connecting and run the commands so I never have to remember to do it manually. The only thing I've found so far that notices a new mouse connection is messages for the

[389-users] Re: Console Troubleshooting

2020-03-10 Thread Mark Reynolds
Nelson, Yes I confirmed we have a faulty/corrupted build.  Still not sure how it happened, but it will be fixed in the next build.  I'm just waiting for a few more fixes to get committed then I will do new Fedora builds (and I'll send you the link to it) Regards, Mark On 3/7/20 9:39 PM,