To answer the question in the subject: The bootloader is installed on
the /boot/efi filesystem, and referenced by path in NVRAM (See the
"efibootmgr" command).
On 4/7/20 10:44 PM, spike wrote:
I'm installing Fedora 31 with a kickstart file that contains
bootloader --location=mbr #Same when o
On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 20:27 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:12:55 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > "lsusb -t" will show you what ports things are plugged into. The
> > backups might have been working but was it running at USB3 speeds or
> > just USB2? The cable might be perf
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 11:09, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > There are no tutorials or docs out there laying out how you are suppose
> to do a Kickstart install with NFS.
>
> Whoops, I mean USB not NFS.
>
> Ok, I don't mean to rude or flippant, but I these requests mainly don't
> get answered. I m
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:45 AM spike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing Fedora 31 with a kickstart file that contains
>
> bootloader --location=mbr #Same when omitting location parameter, mbr is
> default
> zerombr
> clearpart --all
> part /boot/efi --fstype=efi --size=200 --ondisk=sda
> part /
Guys I have found the damn bug.
I have found the culprit. Not sure why is causing the problem but that's
were you guys can help.
After 10 hours of installing and reinstalling in a chroot environment I
have managed to isolate the DNF Group that is causing the problem:
@mate-applications
Yes Mate
Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
package list ?
For example given the package list:
> %packages
> @^workstation-product-environment
> @admin-tools
> @authoring-and-publishing
> @c-development
> @container-management
> @d-development
> @development-tools
> @ed
On 4/12/20 6:31 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
package list ?
How do I chose which is installed first and which is installed later ?
Or are they installed just in the order they are specified ?
They are installed accordin
On 4/12/20 6:22 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
After 10 hours of installing and reinstalling in a chroot environment I
have managed to isolate the DNF Group that is causing the problem:
@mate-applications
That was going to be my next suggestion. The bug mentioned it happened
when they were t
Do you know anything about my other bugs ??
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 8:32 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 6:31 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
> > Also is there any way I can control the order of the installation in my
> > package list ?
> >
> > How do I chose which is installed first and which
On 2020-04-10 20:53, Jack Craig wrote:
hi all,
on F30, i would like to swap enp4s0 to eth0.
outside the network ifcfg* files, any other place(file) to update?
Having a proper ifcfg*, including the HWADDR MAC address used to be enough
(but be sure you rebuild your initrd since renaming happen
I run F31 Mate. When I run dnf upgrade, I often get dozens of kf5
entries (23 today, by my count) -- presumably because I install and
sometimes use K3B or Konqueror; I don't think I ever launch any other KDE
app, at least not knowingly.
In particular, I used to use Konqueror ma
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:24:28 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> Might I ought to bite the bullet, removing K3B and Konqueror?
I just installed a system to test some things, and even though
I did not (knowingly) include any KDE stuff, I got thousands of
these packages (seemed like that many anyway :-)
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to
work again).
However, I don't really want to leave selinux in disabled mode. So, I was
looking around and found the following:
https://l
Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to work again).
[ ... ]
but I am not sure: are these the best ways to use postfix with seli
a big thanks to those that commented on this thread.
further reading of some RH portal docs, i decided my notion was an
unacceptable step backward in techs stream of forward progress.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/html/networking_guide/ch-consistent_netw
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:33:50 -0700
Jack Craig wrote:
> further reading of some RH portal docs, i decided my notion was an
> unacceptable step backward in techs stream of forward progress.
I consider the "improvement" a step backwards. Certainly for
a desktop system with one and only one ethernet
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:45:00 +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again)
On 4/12/20 8:14 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
Do you know anything about my other bugs ??
What other bugs?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Condu
Am 12.04.2020 um 22:49 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:45:00 +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 12.04.2020 um 20:56 schrieb Ranjan Maitra:
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 se
On 4/12/20 10:24 AM, Beartooth wrote:
I'm wondering a couple things. Does all that kf5 stuff, sitting
there almost (?) unused, amount to a security hazard? Does it slow
anything down perceptibly? (I inveterately use too many browsers with too
many tabs.)
No and no. If you're not using
On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to work again).
You need to describe how you have it configured and what isn't working.
I've been usi
it is not a step back for enterprise servers with 2 or more vendors
ethernet cards.
We were doing a udev rule (by pci-busid) so the right cards were in
the right places, and had (pci-busid) rules for each model so that the
names were always the same. The "new" standard makes what we (and
probably
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again).
>
> You need to des
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> > postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it
> > to work again).
>
> You need to des
On 4/12/20 6:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does
not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to wo
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:51:57 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 6:03 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:44:44 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/12/20 11:56 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >>> I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that
> >>> pos
The dracut errors. Anyways let me try since those bugs occur even if I am
building the official Fedora Workstation Live CD from Kickstart. So maybe
they won't be a problem, optimistically speaking.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:32 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/12/20 8:14 AM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
On 4/12/20 10:43 PM, Sreyan Chakravarty wrote:
The dracut errors. Anyways let me try since those bugs occur even if I
am building the official Fedora Workstation Live CD from Kickstart. So
maybe they won't be a problem, optimistically speaking.
I don't remember seeing an email about that to th
28 matches
Mail list logo
