On 7/3/21 9:02 PM, dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:
wget does not download the correct web page.
When you try wget, what happens?
Appreciate any pointers to get the save-page-as.sh working using a browser or a
different command line program.
If wget isn't working, try curl.
On 7/3/21 8:02 PM, dwoody5...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using a shell script called save-page-as.sh to download a complete
web page. This has been working as expected.
The relevant line the the script is:
"${browser}" "-new-window" "${url}" &>/dev/null
I now need the ability to run this
I have been using a shell script called save-page-as.sh to download a complete
web page. This has been working as expected.
The relevant line the the script is:
"${browser}" "-new-window" "${url}" &>/dev/null
I now need the ability to run this program or another program via email to my
computer
> On July 3, 2021 at 7:55 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
> mcgarrett wrote:
>
> > What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 package, or must it be
> > obrained elsewhere?
>
> It is a piece of hardware that either comes with your motherboard
> if it
I notice another requirement for Windows 11 is DirectX 12.
Qemu KVMs have never (as far as I know) gotten any kind of
3d video acceleration. Won't that also put a crimp in
Windows 11 KVMs?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 19:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
mcgarrett wrote:
> What is a TPM, and does it come with the win 11 package, or must it be
> obrained elsewhere?
It is a piece of hardware that either comes with your motherboard
if it is new enough, or you have to add (if it has a header to
allow adding)
> On July 3, 2021 at 6:38 AM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
>
Out of curiosity, I thought I'd see if a physical TPM module is
available for my motherboard. Looking in the manual I see there
is a header for one, and gigabyte has a specific model number
for the one that is compatible.
None are in stock anywhere save a couple of entries on ebay where
the
On 3 Jul 2021 at 15:35, Dave Stevens wrote:
Date sent: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 15:35:02 -0700
From: Dave Stevens
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Clonezilla.
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
users
> On
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 16:04:41 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> I'm not sure what to recommend without knowing the use case.
Me too. I recently wanted to clone a bootable 32GB usb stick and what
worked easily for me once I found it was
1) dd if=/dev/sdb1 of=MyUSBClone.iso
2) etcher with the iso as
On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 10:18 AM Ger van Dijck wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora ,
>
>
> Thanks to George N. Withe 111 , Bob Marcom, Erik P. Olsen and Klaus
> Peter Schrage.
>
> I did install rpmshere-release with dnf : Runs fine.
>
>
> I did install clonezilla-2.3.1-1.noarch.rpm with dnf and got following
>
On 04/07/2021 05:16, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
device.
Oh, I'd never noticed. It is in virt-manager "add
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 13:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > system,
> > are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
> > already been dealt with?
> >
>
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 22:05 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Just have to add the tpm device to your vm using virsh.
> > >
> > > I'll have to give that a try. My Win10 VM doesn't have that
> > > device.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Oh, I'd never noticed. It is in virt-manager "add hardware"
>
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 21:07 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 20:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > > On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > > > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel
On 7/2/21 9:02 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
poc
Hi Poc,
Fedora 34
qemu-kvm-5.2.0-8.fc34.x86_64
I have Windows 11 Version Dev
Ger van Dijck wrote:
> When giving dnf update I get the following message:invalid value
> failovermethod = priority in /etc/yum.repo.d/teamviewer.repo . Configuration
> : Optionbinding with failovermethod does not excist.
>
> What does it mean ? and how can I prevent it ?
Remove (or comment)
Sorry, link was copied badly:
https://computingforgeeks.com/how-to-install-teamviewer-on-fedora/
Am 3. Juli 2021 21:05:51 MESZ schrieb Klaus-Peter Schrage :
>Perhaps this guide might help:
>https://coteamviewermputingforgeeks.com/how-to-install--on-fedora/
>
>Am 3. Juli 2021 18:54:11 MESZ
Perhaps this guide might help:
https://coteamviewermputingforgeeks.com/how-to-install--on-fedora/
Am 3. Juli 2021 18:54:11 MESZ schrieb Ger van Dijck :
>Hi all,
>
>
>
>
>When giving dnf update I get the following message:invalid value
>failovermethod = priority in /etc/yum.repo.d/teamviewer.repo
Hello,
Here is an issue.
If I install perl-PDL-2.26.0 (the standard version with fc34)
I cannot compile perl-PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.20 (cpan)
but I can compile
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71 (cpan)
If I install
perl-PDL-2.51.0
I can compile
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot-0.71 (but not newer versions)
but
On 7/3/21 7:03 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 18:54:11 +0200
Ger van Dijck wrote:
What does it mean ? and how can I prevent it ?
No idea, but I see so many weird messages during dnf
updates that I just ignore them and wait to see if
I notice a real problem before worrying about
Hi Linux world,
When dnf update I get the following message : Errors during downloading
fedora-cisco-openh264. etc etc
How to resolve this problem ?
Regards,
Ger van Dijck.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/07/2021 00:54, Ger van Dijck wrote:
When giving dnf update I get the following message:invalid value failovermethod
= priority in /etc/yum.repo.d/teamviewer.repo . Configuration : Optionbinding
with failovermethod does not excist.
What does it mean ? and how can I prevent it ?
On Sat, 3 Jul 2021 18:54:11 +0200
Ger van Dijck wrote:
> What does it mean ? and how can I prevent it ?
No idea, but I see so many weird messages during dnf
updates that I just ignore them and wait to see if
I notice a real problem before worrying about them.
Hi all,
When giving dnf update I get the following message:invalid value
failovermethod = priority in /etc/yum.repo.d/teamviewer.repo .
Configuration : Optionbinding with failovermethod does not excist.
What does it mean ? and how can I prevent it ?
Ger van Dijck.
On 2021-07-03 5:27 a.m., Walter H. via users wrote:
On 03.07.2021 08:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM,
Hi Fedora ,
Thanks to George N. Withe 111 , Bob Marcom, Erik P. Olsen and Klaus
Peter Schrage.
I did install rpmshere-release with dnf : Runs fine.
I did install clonezilla-2.3.1-1.noarch.rpm with dnf and got following
message :Nothing provides drbl-partimage >=0.6.7 needed by clonezilla
Hello,
Trying to compile perl-PDL-LAPACK,
I get:
gcc -c "-I/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Core" -I./CLAPACK -D_REENTRANT
-D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
On 03/07/2021 20:46, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft
On 03/07/2021 20:25, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for
On 03.07.2021 08:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > > system,
> > > >
On Sat, 2021-07-03 at 19:17 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > > system,
> > > >
On 03/07/2021 14:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt
On Fri, 2021-07-02 at 23:02 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new
> > > system,
> > > are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and
On 2021-07-02 4:03 p.m., Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-07-02 9:02 a.m., Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Since Microsoft is going to require a TPM module for their new system,
are there implications for KVM, VirtualBox and VMware, or has this
already been dealt with?
qemu has support for a TPM 2.0
36 matches
Mail list logo
