I want to assign to a guest/domain in gnome-boxes a usb-device a
chipcardreader.
In general if I use the gui method it works like expected.
The problem is that you have to activate the usbdevice after each
suspention of the guest again and again.
So after searching for a solution Ive seen some
Chris Murphy writes:
>
> That is correct, but it is a prerequisite for being able to even trust
> userspace if kernel space is already compromised then it's a problem.
I dont trust the Companies that their proprietary Bioses and UEFIs are
not itself a rootkit. So the only solution to fix this pr
Maybe it was back then no GPT problem, this tool doenst support gpt, but
uefi is the next thing, you need to install the right 64bit uefi grub
version or something.
The point is it adds much more complexity and I personaly gain NOTHING
of it, so why the hell should I use it?
Yes because at some
Chris Murphy writes:
I try to not answer to much, because I dont want to argue to much, I
just wanted a solution for my problem and this had nothing to do with
secure boot, but I give my 2 cents to it.
Did you really happen to see such a exploit in the wild that somebody
used kvm to start window
Mickey writes:
> I don't have uefi on my box and I'am getting the same error message
> that pops up in the Notification Jobs in my system tray.
Did you answer to the wrong thread or to what message do you refer?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subsc
Chris Murphy writes:
So first of all, I am thankful that u helped me to understand the
problem I was shure I somehow on a interupted dnf process or something I
damaged something in fedora, because I did not remember or notice that
it did not update grub from the beginning.
Maybe I make a switch
Chris Murphy writes:
>
> Again if you're using modern utilities, you don't have to know any of
> these things, alignment is a solved problem. My point is that Btrfs
> doesn't do anything differently than other filesystems in this regard,
> which is exactly nothing. It all depends on an earlier to
Chris Murphy writes:
> Where you get bad results is with, e.g. a pre-existing legacy OS like
> Windows XP, where it's not aligned and any subsequent partition is
> also not aligned. In that case, even a Btrfs volume wouldn't be
> aligned.
I dont want to care at all, I dont want to know if to use
Chris Murphy writes:
> There should be packages somewhere on http://czarc.org but I'm not
> sure where. If you can't find them lemme know and I'll go dig around.
thank you is that the file?
http://czarc.org/fedora/repo/20/x86_64/grubby-8.35-4%2b.gc759.fc20.x86_64.rpm
> /boot on Btrfs isn't a p
thx so far, I dont see one of the 2 solutions a good solution for me, I
dont see packages for this grubby version, I dont want to compile it
myself, it doesnt seem to be fixed soon, it seems that this patch will
not land for fedora 21, so I have to deal with that manual update... for
another year o
here some infos
dnf reinstall kernel -v
http://ix.io/eMK
and my rootfs/home (btrfs) mounts:
/dev/sda on / type btrfs (rw,noatime,compress=lzo,ssd,discard,space_cache)
/dev/sda on /home type btrfs (rw,noatime,compress=lzo,ssd,discard,space_cache)
I don't know how to debug that further or where
hmm I have direct a btrfs filesystem on my ssd without partitions direct
on /dev/sda. grub supports it, so I dont see a problem with that. And
because u have subvolumes I dont see a reason to use partitions anymore.
I think your suggestion sounds logical, but I am pretty shure that it
worked in th
When I update to a new kernel with dnf or yum, it
installs it, creates a working initramfs file like it should, but it does
not update grub.cfg in /boot/grub2/ .
I see following error:
grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template
when I do then:
sudo grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/gr
13 matches
Mail list logo
