On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
1) overlapping AP coverage
They are on different frequencies - so there is no overlap.
2) recommending a high power AP is not really appropriate (in fact 300
mW may well be illegal in some places) - this
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:09 AM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible that this is a design fault upstream in NetworkManager,
and I can understand that Fedora developers may wash their hands of
this issue citing this as an upstream design problem and saying file a
BZ
On Sunday 30 January 2011 20:10:15 Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/30/2011 11:49 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
I don't know if the design of NetworkManager ever considered this
scenario and whether any developer ever put in place code to hook up
to a valid strong signal even if a previously valid signal
On Monday 31 January 2011 01:18:35 Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/31/2011 05:15 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/30/2011 03:42 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one
On 01/31/2011 06:39 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
Ed, can I ask for practical details? Currently my router gives wifi coverage
on the ground floor and first floor (and is little used, but desirable). By
the time the signal reaches my office in a stone building in the garden it is
very weak. I
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one can
get a good 100mW - 300mW init for not much more. (Google: Ubiquiti)
Ubiquiti 300mbit hardware is running off of 100mbit
On 31/01/11 09:50, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one can
get a good 100mW - 300mW init for not much more. (Google: Ubiquiti)
On 01/31/2011 10:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one can
get a good 100mW - 300mW init for not much more. (Google: Ubiquiti)
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 07:49:35PM +, mike cloaked wrote:
I have a question for any wireless expert who can help.
At home I have two wireless access points - one upstairs and one
downstairs - to give a good signal anywhere in the house.
What I would like is to have a seamless wireless
I have a question for any wireless expert who can help.
At home I have two wireless access points - one upstairs and one
downstairs - to give a good signal anywhere in the house.
What I would like is to have a seamless wireless access from any
laptop whether mine or a visitor with the
On 01/30/2011 03:16 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
bug.
If behavior is as described then its a bug - that's precisely how ALL
access points are set up for any case where there is more than a single
AP on same SSID .. i.e. every commercial, office, hotel, campus, airport
etc wifi is done exactly
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com writes:
The point of roaming with multiple AP's is to be able to seamlessly
move around without the connections dying ... as far as user is
concerned its a single network - just like when you roam with a cell
phone - you don't care when the connection is
On 01/30/2011 03:42 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com writes:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one can
get a good 100mW - 300mW init for not much more.
On 01/31/2011 05:15 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/30/2011 03:42 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
My advice to the OP would be to get a better AP with a more powerful
radio. Typical consumer junk is 15mW. Without looking too hard one can
get a good 100mW - 300mW init for not much more.
On 01/30/2011 09:51 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
They are on different frequencies - so there is no overlap.
2) recommending a high power AP is not really appropriate (Ubiquiti)
I take it back - this could well be a good alternate solution ...
--
users mailing list
15 matches
Mail list logo
