Tim:
>> It's the same as following someone home then picking a fight with them,
>> because you no-longer feel obliged to behave with decency. They only
>> way to stop someone doing that sort of thing is to make it known what
>> they're doing.
Ralf Corsepius:
> Sometimes no, sometimes yes.
>
> I
On 05/03/2013 06:49 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 03 May 2013, Ralf Corsepius sent:
Well, people who are replying to PM on lists, to me qualify as "not
showing any respect to privacy" and them not being able to destinguish
between "confidential" and "public" correspondence.
That said, t
Allegedly, on or about 03 May 2013, Ralf Corsepius sent:
> Well, people who are replying to PM on lists, to me qualify as "not
> showing any respect to privacy" and them not being able to destinguish
> between "confidential" and "public" correspondence.
>
> That said, to me, replying to private
On Fri, 3 May 2013, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
BTW, one of them asks members not to top-post in replies ...
Yeah, sorry. This is the only mailinglist I belong to where folk still
obsess about it. It's been interesting, over the years, to watch the
On 05/03/2013 11:10 AM, Tim wrote:
Though, having said that, it has been my policy that if someone from a
mailing list sent me a cowardly private nastygram, I would reply back to
the list. They rarely ever did that to me more than once, after that.
Well, people who are replying to PM on lists,
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> do think it's a worthy topic, I'm just not sure that the Fedora list
> is the place for it since it has really nothing specifically to do
> with Fedora, or indeed with Linux, or operating systems, or software
> or computers, but with p
BTW, one of them asks members not to top-post in replies ...
Most other lists to which I belong have given in to modern mailing
conventions, which largely have fallen to the dictates of Outlook (and
even alpine) defaults.
For what it's worth, once I understood the bottom post situation,
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
BTW, one of them asks members not to top-post in replies ...
poc
Yeah, sorry. This is the only mailinglist I belong to where folk still obsess
about it. It's been interesting, over the years, to watch the top-post fetish
move from cutting
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 20:29 +, Bill Oliver wrote:
> Sure, but as those of us who spend a lot of time in court come to recognize,
> what constitutes "bad manners" and what is "illegal" (and particularly what
> is excludable from court), are two very, very different things.
I think that's un
On Thu, 2 May 2013 18:48:36 + (UTC)
Bill Oliver wrote:
>
> In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy
> regarding email. I think this is a reasonable topic for an email
> mailing list, since there are many differing perceptions.
...snip...
I think it&#x
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 03:04:14PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 18:48 +, Bill Oliver wrote:
> > In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy
> > regarding email. I think this is a reasonable topic for an email
> > mai
ote:
3a) There is a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding email sent
from one person to one other person.
I might add that although there's no legal prohibition about making private
emails public, most people consider it bad manners to do so without the
sender's permission. "Wh
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:13:01PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 11:48 AM, Bill Oliver wrote:
> >3a) There is a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding email sent
> >from one person to one other person.
>
> I might add that although there's no legal prohibit
On 05/02/2013 07:48 PM, Bill Oliver wrote:
In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy
regarding email. I think this is a reasonable topic for an email mailing
list, since there are many differing perceptions.
Of course, laws and customs vary across the world. In the
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 18:48 +, Bill Oliver wrote:
> In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy
> regarding email. I think this is a reasonable topic for an email
> mailing list, since there are many differing perceptions.
I do think it's a worthy topic
On 05/02/2013 11:48 AM, Bill Oliver wrote:
3a) There is a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding email sent
from one person to one other person.
I might add that although there's no legal prohibition about making
private emails public, most people consider it bad manners to
Am 02.05.2013 20:48, schrieb Bill Oliver:
> In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy regarding
> email. I think this is a reasonable
> topic for an email mailing list, since there are many differing perceptions.
>
> Any person who expects that th
In another thread, respondents debated the expectation of privacy regarding
email. I think this is a reasonable topic for an email mailing list, since
there are many differing perceptions.
Of course, laws and customs vary across the world. In the United States, there
is a rather complex
18 matches
Mail list logo
