On 08/18/2010 09:15 PM, jdow wrote:
> From: "g"
> Sent: Saturday, 2010/August/07 17:15
>
>
> "yes, the higher the frequency, the greater the loss. but there is 'low
> loss' coax for vhf and micro freqs."
this is true. all in design. would not be a lot of coax being sold if
it where not so made
On 08/08/2010 01:59 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
[comment brought back to mind by another post]
> At 5Ghz, assuming no wrinkles or bends to cause a reflection,
yes, but in time, a bend, less than recommended, would be more of a center
wire propagation than of reflection concern.
both are a consider
From: "g"
Sent: Saturday, 2010/August/07 17:15
"yes, the higher the frequency, the greater the loss. but there is 'low
loss'
coax for vhf and micro freqs."
"get your head out of cb radio days and rg58 days. :)"
Gene has more experience with RF in his little finger than it
sounds like "g" has
On 08/07/2010 11:07 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
> Netgear WNDR330 dual band
Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
> Netgear WNDR330 dual band "N" wireless router an
On 08/07/2010 12:07 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N,
...
> snip
>
...
> Does anyone have experience with a similar system? I would be
> interested to know if
Bob Goodwin writes:
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
> Netgear WNDR330 dual band "N" wireless router an
On Saturday, August 07, 2010 09:49:35 pm g did opine:
> On 08/07/2010 08:30 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> double clicking 1st in list of coax cables, 1671a, produces spec sheet;
>
> https://edeskv2.belden.com/Products/index.cfm?event=showproductdetail&pa
> rtid=3462
>
> scrolling down page show
On Saturday, August 07, 2010 09:42:56 pm Bob Goodwin did opine:
> > [r...@coyote linux-2.6.35.1]# ping shop
> > PING shop.coyote.den (192.168.71.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > 64 bytes from shop.coyote.den (192.168.71.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64
> > time=1.76 ms
> > 64 bytes from shop.coyote.den (192.168.
On 08/07/2010 09:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Absolutely Bob.
*not*
get your head out of cb radio days and rg58 days. :)
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today.
**
to mess up a linu
On 08/07/2010 08:30 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> G, I have antennas all over, but these two boxes I am messing with have no
> connectors.
hello bob,
no connectors? usb or cheap cards?
some usb wifi have a hidden connector.
i have never seen a wifi card that you could not change antenna or remove
On 07/08/10 17:32, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Absolutely Bob. About the practical Maximum Usable Frequency of coax is in
> the 2.2 Ghz range, and that is for 1.625 inch heliax or better yet, rigid.
> About $7 to $12/foot, used. I have used smaller stuff, but at 1.5Ghz
> ranges, with buckets of pow
On Saturday, August 07, 2010 05:14:52 pm Bob Goodwin did opine:
> On 07/08/10 16:00, g wrote:
> > then, start out with a reflector plane and graduate up to a helix.
> >
> > i have built 'cantenna', 'log periodic', and 'helix' for amateur radio
> > microwave, and wifi, with good to excellent res
On 07/08/10 16:00, g wrote:
>
> then, start out with a reflector plane and graduate up to a helix.
>
> i have built 'cantenna', 'log periodic', and 'helix' for amateur radio
> microwave, and wifi, with good to excellent results for both.
>
> have fun.
>
G, I have antennas all over, but these
On 08/07/2010 06:07 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Any suggestions or observations will be appreciated. I feel,like I
> am operating in a vacuum with no one to consult.
bob, jd,
when you can not boost output power, concentrate/increase antenna's output.
you may think this is 'tmi', but it is much l
On 08/07/2010 11:07 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
> have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
> Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
> Netgear WNDR330 dua
This is a current updated f-13 computer connected to our home LAN. I
have been using a Buffalo Airstation WLI-TX4-AG300N, essentially an
Ethernet wireless adapter to access the system. I recently bought a
Netgear WNDR330 dual band "N" wireless router and am having a lot of
tro
17 matches
Mail list logo
