On 4/26/23 15:08, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Frankly, that's a consequence of using Fedora. Things change, usually
for the better, but you're expected to keep up. Relying on "the old
ways" will eventually bite you.
The next one I guess I am going
On 4/25/23 02:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Frankly, that's a consequence of using Fedora. Things change, usually
for the better, but you're expected to keep up. Relying on "the old
ways" will eventually bite you.
The next one I guess I am going to have to bite
the bullet on is transitioning f
On 4/25/23 21:00, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 17:44, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and u
On 4/25/23 17:44, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method
On 4/25/23 18:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:44:07 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Keyfiles vs. ifcfg
https://fedoramagazine.org/converting-networkmanager-from-ifcfg-to-keyfiles/
I converted when there was no longer default support for ifcfg
files unless I installed Networ
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:44:07 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Keyfiles vs. ifcfg
>
> https://fedoramagazine.org/converting-networkmanager-from-ifcfg-to-keyfiles/
I converted when there was no longer default support for ifcfg
files unless I installed NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh.x86_6
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference to stay on the old method.
What new
On 4/25/23 02:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 02:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
Hi Sam,
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 02:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
> networking method that what has been transpiring
> was my preferen
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
Hi Sam,
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference to stay on the old method.
I did not see the point in changing things just f
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 20:02:12 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> 10: more info:
11: In some version of fedora, my br0 started getting a random MAC
address but in the previous fedora, it inherited the MAC address of
the physical ethernet port I connected it to. As a result, my DHCP
server gave
On 4/24/23 17:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Oh this took my breath away. The stinking update
trashed my bridge and took out all my qemu-kvm
virtual machines
My notes on how to restore br0:
My better updated notes:
How to add or restore a bridge (br0) when knocked out by an upgrade:
Refe
On 4/24/23 18:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Oh this took my breath away. The stinking update
trashed my bridge and took out all my qemu-kvm
virtual machines
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble. I haven't had
any issues with updates a
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Oh this took my breath away. The stinking update
trashed my bridge and took out all my qemu-kvm
virtual machines
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble. I haven't had any
issues with updates a
On 4/24/23 17:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Oh this took my breath away. The stinking update
trashed my bridge and took out all my qemu-kvm
virtual machines
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble. I haven't had any
issues with updates and I have a much more complicated netw
Oh this took my breath away. The stinking update
trashed my bridge and took out all my qemu-kvm
virtual machines
My notes on how to restore br0:
How to add or restore a bridge (br0) when knocked out by an upgrade:
Reference:
https://www.thegeeksearch.com/how-to-configure-network-bridge-in-c
On 4/24/23 06:07, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
What's your DHCP server? (A PC, a hardware router?)
ToddAndMargo:
It is a frontier DSL modem/router/dhcp sever/hub
That can make it harder, most consumer devices have limited
customisation options.
My modem/router is very limited, and major pain
Tim:
>> What's your DHCP server? (A PC, a hardware router?)
ToddAndMargo:
> It is a frontier DSL modem/router/dhcp sever/hub
That can make it harder, most consumer devices have limited
customisation options.
My modem/router is very limited, and major pain to configure (and
wouldn't even let me
On 4/24/23 00:19, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2023-04-24 at 12:25 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
What's your DHCP server? (A PC, a hardware router?)
It is a frontier DSL modem/router/dhcp sever/hub
Can you configure
it correctly for your network preferences?
Is configuring your DHCP server
On 4/24/23 00:15, Tim via users wrote:
Tim:
Those parameters are not part of "/etc/named.conf". Do you mean
"/etc/resolv.conf"?
ToddAndMargo:
Yes. That is embarrasing
Don't forget to update your bugzilla entry, or they might close it.
Thank you! Just did
___
On Mon, 2023-04-24 at 12:25 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> What's your DHCP server? (A PC, a hardware router?) Can you configure
> it correctly for your network preferences?
Is configuring your DHCP server with the DNS server address you want
your clients to use possible? This would automate thi
Tim:
>> Those parameters are not part of "/etc/named.conf". Do you mean
>> "/etc/resolv.conf"?
ToddAndMargo:
> Yes. That is embarrasing
Don't forget to update your bugzilla entry, or they might close it.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 15:41:52 UTC 2023 x86
On 4/23/23 19:55, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 16:51 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
The last round altered the following:
/etc/named.conf
file is not a link, so should be left alone
(and still not a link)
Altered file:
# Generated by NetworkManager
sea
On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 16:51 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> The last round altered the following:
>
>
> /etc/named.conf
> file is not a link, so should be left alone
> (and still not a link)
>
> Altered file:
># Generated by NetworkManager
>search netgear.com acme.loca
On 4/23/23 16:51, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
/etc/named.conf
file is not a link, so should be left alone
(and still not a link)
Altered file:
# Generated by NetworkManager
search netgear.com acme.local # netgear.com ??
nameserver 192.168.250.1# address o
Hi All,
How do I get updates to stop altering my network configuration?
I use a local caching named server (named-chroot)
The last round altered the following:
/etc/named.conf
file is not a link, so should be left alone
(and still not a link)
Altered file:
# Generated by NetworkMana
27 matches
Mail list logo
