On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
>> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant
>> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back to N
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:31 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>>
>> Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
>> which fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant
>> file seems to be the way to go. It's now back t
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 23:52 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> >
> > BTW, I'd give the URL of the old thread but I can't find it on the
> > list archives. My original post is from 17/12/2015 if you want to
> > search for it, but I'm afraid the new archive page defeats me. It
> > seems quite astoundingly slow a
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few mon
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 12:36 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedorap
> > > roje
> > > ct.org/thread/EHMPKQNNV5B3KRBI6GI
On 04/19/2016 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproje
ct.org/thread/EHMPKQNNV5B3KRBI6GIMAFMUZH4WIVE7/
That's it, but how did you find it?
I went to the month you said you p
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:39 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > Apparently at the time I changed from NAT to Bridged networking,
> which
> > fixed it (don't ask me why). However removing the redundant file
> seems
> > to be the way to go. It's now back to NAT.
> >
> Bridged networking doesn't use the vir
On 04/19/2016 10:24 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months
ago
that wasn't crea
On 19 Apr 2016 18:25, "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This thread finally explains why you had a
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 17:50 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months
> > > ago
> > > that wasn't created by libvirt
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> This thread finally explains why you had a virbr0 a few months ago
>> that wasn't created by libvirt but was messing up your dnsmasq setup!
>
> You have a good memory :-)
Sometimes.
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 14:31 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > Is one supposed to know this by magic? I can't be the only one
> who's
> > had this problem. I read the Release Notes every time I update the
> > system and can't recall seeing it anywhere.
> >
> >
> >
> Note that a standard install has no
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 15:49 +0200, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Have you tried rebooting since then? Does it still work? I don't
> > > think you should have an ifcfg f
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried rebooting since then? Does it still work? I don't
>> think you should have an ifcfg file for that interface as you don't
>> want NetworkManager interacting with
On 19 April 2016 at 12:22, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 V
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 12:56 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt
> > > system
> > > for
> > > several months now
On 04/18/2016 05:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system
for
several months now and have had no problems up to now. However
recently
I've been getting error messages from W
On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I've been occasionally using a Windows 7 VM with the libvirt system
> for
> several months now and have had no problems up to now. However
> recently
> I've been getting error messages from Windows about the network being
> "unknown" a
18 matches
Mail list logo
