On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I would suggest trying to get your own openvpn config working if
> possible. There might be a script that the binary uses to configure the
> routing, see if you can find that. Try running "strings" on the binary.
> You could also just
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 09:04 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan
> ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > >
> > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > ha scritto:
> > > >
Il giorno mar 21 ago 2018 alle 11:46, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split
tunnelling
> is
> when
On 08/23/18 09:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>>
>> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
>
> The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
> well.
> What's
On 08/22/2018 04:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing
On 08/22/2018 02:56 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
The output is almost identical except that route gives you the metric as
well. What's wrong with the route command other than it is
On 08/22/2018 01:59 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask
On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
> a VM, not relevant here):
I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my case...
No VPN
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ netstat
On 08/23/18 05:56, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/22/18 23:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
>> a VM, not relevant here):
>
> I've never been a fan of the "route" command.
>
> How about the output of "netstat -rn" instead? In my
On 08/22/2018 08:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This is the routing table with the VPN enabled (the virbr stuff is from
a VM, not relevant here):
(I rearranged the table.)
$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
0.0.0.0
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 15:15 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
> > (provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
> > through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have
On 08/21/2018 09:08 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It works as far as it goes, but still no split tunnel. I suspect the
(provider-supplied *binary*) connection script is forcing all traffic
through the tunnel. Looks like I'll have to play with OpenVPN using the
provider's credentials and see if
On 08/21/2018 02:49 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
However, my openvpn connection only routes the private network subnets,
everything else goes over the regular network connection.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "private
On 08/21/2018 04:21 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
VPN-server processes can push routing info, and DNS-server addresses.
AFAICR systems accept three DNS-resolvers.
This can be tricky. If the VPN-process pushes three resolvers, the old ones
will be gone (while the tunnel exists),
Thus you are
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:44 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 18:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
>
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 11:21 +, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> See comment below.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Split t
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 18:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > > Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > ha scritto:
> > > > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be
See comment below.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Callaghan [mailto:pocallag...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 11:49
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Split tunnelling
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patr
On 08/21/18 17:46, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> ha scritto:
>>> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
>>> is
>>> when network traffic to some
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 09:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 09:10 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>
> Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
> ha scritto:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
> > is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > tunnelled
Il giorno lun 20 ago 2018 alle 14:03, Patrick O'Callaghan
ha scritto:
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling
is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through
normal
channels.
On 08/20/2018 05:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal
channels. I've tried messing with
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 14:30 +0200, None via users wrote:
> You can do this with ovpn by pushing routes trough ovpn connection. Not
> per app perse, I do hope I get your question the correct way.
> maybe look at this:
>
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 21:36 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 08/20/18 20:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> > when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> > tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the
On 08/20/18 20:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Has anyone got this to work in Fedora? To be clear, split tunnelling is
> when network traffic to some destinations (or for some apps) is
> tunnelled over a VPN, while the rest of the traffic goes through normal
> channels. I've tried messing with
Hey Poc,
You can do this with ovpn by pushing routes trough ovpn connection. Not
per app perse, I do hope I get your question the correct way.
maybe look at this:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OpenVPN#Routing_client_traffic_through_the_server
The documentation is from Arch, but does
27 matches
Mail list logo
