On 02/27/14 07:00, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Neither do I. This is the first thing I tried and where I started to get
> confused. The system tray (as I wrote) **used to** have two rows before I
> dinked with
> System Settings->Applications Appearance
> or possible before a system update (bo
On Wed 26 February 2014 14:30:57 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 22:02 +, Colin J Thomson wrote:
> > On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> > > row: items that hide themselves into the
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 06:38 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 02/27/14 06:30, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> >
> > This only makes things worse. The large (native) icons get larger,
> > while the icons put into the tray by applications stay the same size. A
> > screenshot is attached. The tray does not
On 02/27/14 06:30, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> This only makes things worse. The large (native) icons get larger,
> while the icons put into the tray by applications stay the same size. A
> screenshot is attached. The tray does not become two row. Just to be
> clear, I am asking about the *tray*
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 22:02 +, Colin J Thomson wrote:
> On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> > row: items that hide themselves into the tray are small and not
> > resizeable (Thunderbird, Qalculate, K
On Wed 26 February 2014 12:36:56 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> My system tray used to have two rows of small icons. Now it has one
> row: items that hide themselves into the tray are small and not
> resizeable (Thunderbird, Qalculate, Knemo); native widgets are large and
> resizeable (Klipper, Kmix, D
