On 4/10/23 09:07, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 28/9/23 20:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
what
I saw b
On 28/9/23 20:32, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
what
I saw between this reply and my signature. It s
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 13:14 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was
> still
> mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see
> what
> I saw between this reply and my signature. It starts off with an
> error
> messag
On 2023-09-23 10:45, steven stern wrote:
I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
I would probably ask that question in this BZ
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 17:36 -0700, Dave Close wrote:
> The problem could be your Evolution. Adam's message seemed just fine
> when I saw it using exmh.
It was mangled on two different versions of Evolution on two different
Linux distros. It could still be an Evolution problem, but it could
also b
Hi,
Full-quoted reply, for once, but for a special reason... It was still
mangled this time, I've left the whole thing below so you can see what
I saw between this reply and my signature. It starts off with an error
message, and the message has character encoding (and/or decoding)
problems (I se
Dave Close wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>> Adam Mercer wrote:
>>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up
>>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39
>>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue...
>>
>>Well, I might disagree. Your m
Tim wrote:
> Adam Mercer wrote:
>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up
>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39
>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue...
>
>Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely scram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, September 26th, 2023 at 09:09, Tim via users
wrote:
> Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely scrambled by the
> GPG/PGP process.
>
> What I see is mostly unhandled MIME coming through
On Mon, 2023-09-25 at 16:31 +, Adam Mercer via users wrote:
> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up for
> F38 wit=
> hout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39 source RPM
> using moc=
> k, and so far it's been running without issue...
Well, I might disagre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, September 24th, 2023 at 06:36, stan via users
wrote:
> If you aren't going to update to F39 when it is released (it's in
> beta), then you could download the src.rpm and build it locally if you
> ar
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:45:41 -0500
steven stern wrote:
> I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
> been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
>
> https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
Not the package maint
I see that Thunderbird 115.2 is in koji, but it looks like it has not
been build for Fedora 38. Is that coming?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=39
https://i.imgur.com/bKEMxjt.png
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorapr
13 matches
Mail list logo
