2010/11/4 Paul Smith
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Manuel Escudero
> wrote:
> >> >> Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
> >> >>
> >> >> # yum install VirtualBox-OSE
> >> >> Loaded plugins: presto, refre
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote:
>> >> Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
>> >>
>> >> # yum install VirtualBox-OSE
>> >> Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
>> >> Setting up Install Process
>
2010/11/3 Paul Smith
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
> >>
> >> # yum install VirtualBox-OSE
> >> Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
> >> Setting up Install Proc
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
>>
>> # yum install VirtualBox-OSE
>> Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
>> Setting up Install Process
>> Resolving Dependencies
>> --&
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 21:40:59 +
Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
>
> # yum install VirtualBox-OSE
> Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
> Setting up Install Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --
Dear All,
Has someone found a workaround for this problem:
# yum install VirtualBox-OSE
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package VirtualBox-OSE.x86_64 0:3.2.6-2.fc14 set to be installed
--> P
On 10/31/2010 03:10 PM, Tod Thomas wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 06:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
>> On 10/29/2010 01:36 PM, Tod Thomas wrote:
>>>The full messages is:
>>>
>>> VirtualBox: supR3HardenedMainGetTrustedMain:
>>> dlopen("/usr/lib/virt
On 10/29/2010 06:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 01:36 PM, Tod Thomas wrote:
>>The full messages is:
>>
>> VirtualBox: supR3HardenedMainGetTrustedMain:
>> dlopen("/usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so",) failed: VBoxVMM.so: cannot
>> open sh
On 10/29/2010 01:36 PM, Tod Thomas wrote:
> The full messages is:
>
> VirtualBox: supR3HardenedMainGetTrustedMain:
> dlopen("/usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so",) failed: VBoxVMM.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
>
>
The full messages is:
VirtualBox: supR3HardenedMainGetTrustedMain:
dlopen("/usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so",) failed: VBoxVMM.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
The VBoxVMM.so file is in the same directory as the VirtualBox.so file.
Also:
ld
On 27 October 2010 15:29, Robert Karge wrote:
> I have been using Fedora off/on since F3. I'm a heavy user of VirtualBox.
> From F3 to F13 USB is not evident. All suggestions from Fedora sources
> don't work. All other Linux Distros I have tried have automated access to
I have been using Fedora off/on since F3. I'm a heavy user of VirtualBox.
>From F3 to F13 USB is not evident. All suggestions from Fedora sources
don't work. All other Linux Distros I have tried have automated access to
USB in VirtualBox.
Please help me with an absolute me
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 21:18 -0400, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> your user has to be a member of the vboxusers
> group or something like that in order for you to access USB correctly.
Yep, that was it! Works great now! THANK YOU!!
--Greg
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
ndows 7 virtual machines
under VirtualBox 3.2.10, latest version downloaded from virtualbox.org.
Both are running Fedora 12.
On one, everything works just fine. On the other, the Motorola USB
device is greyed out and I cannot connect it to the virtual machine. The
Droid is plugged in while configured f
I'm trying to sync my Droid phone with a Windows application. Doesn't
sound like a Fedora issue at first, but read on.
I've got two machines with the same motherboard and CPU, but otherwise
not identical hardware. Both are running Windows 7 virtual machines
under VirtualBox 3.2.10,
2010/9/29 Germán A. Racca
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 09/29/2010 05:49 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> > > More ideas? Did it happen to someone else that used virtualbox to run
> > > Fedora 14 Alfa or Beta?
> >
> > h
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 05:49 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> > More ideas? Did it happen to someone else that used virtualbox to run
> > Fedora 14 Alfa or Beta?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621893
Thanks
On 09/29/2010 05:49 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> More ideas? Did it happen to someone else that used virtualbox to run
> Fedora 14 Alfa or Beta?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621893
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 00:46 +0200, DB wrote:
> On 30/09/10 00:35, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:23 +0200, DB wrote:
> >> On 28/09/10 00:49, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> >>> The version of VirtualBox from the fedora repos doe
On 30/09/10 00:35, Germán A. Racca wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:23 +0200, DB wrote:
>> On 28/09/10 00:49, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
>>> The version of VirtualBox from the fedora repos does not include USB
>>> access.
>>>
>>> 1) U
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 15:23 +0200, DB wrote:
> On 28/09/10 00:49, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The version of VirtualBox from the fedora repos does not include USB
> > access.
> >
> > 1) Uninstall VirtualBox-OSE.
> > 2) Then
On 28/09/10 00:49, users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The version of VirtualBox from the fedora repos does not include USB
> access.
>
> 1) Uninstall VirtualBox-OSE.
> 2) Then copy the repo from here
> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/vi
On 09/27/2010 10:39 AM, DB wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just loaded VirtualBox on my antique system - very pleasantly surprised
> how easily eveything (almost!) seems to have gone must be a problem
> waiting to bite me!
>
> Anyway, reason for going down this path is to be
Hi All,
Just loaded VirtualBox on my antique system - very pleasantly surprised
how easily eveything (almost!) seems to have gone must be a problem
waiting to bite me!
Anyway, reason for going down this path is to be able to use Photbook
software which runs on everything - so long as it&#
On 9/25/10 1:23 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 19:53 -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
>> Well, I finally made it to the site. There is "Free" and "NonFree",
>> which I had interpreted to mean "Pay", the opposite of "Free".
> "Freedom," in this case, from various restrictions, or not quite so
On 09/25/2010 08:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 18:37 +1000, Roger wrote:
I use upstream virtual box + dkms - and I have not had 1 problem with
any kernel update.
just another data point ..
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
ean "Pay", the opposite of "Free".
> > "Freedom," in this case, from various restrictions, or not quite so free
> > from them.
> >
> I'm late in on this subject but can say that the last 3 kernel updates
> always broke Virtualbox in Ubu
edom," in this case, from various restrictions, or not quite so free
> from them.
>
I'm late in on this subject but can say that the last 3 kernel updates
always broke Virtualbox in Ubuntu 10.4 on my daughter's laptop.
She has to reinstall Vbox and windows if she updates a
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 19:53 -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
> Well, I finally made it to the site. There is "Free" and "NonFree",
> which I had interpreted to mean "Pay", the opposite of "Free".
"Freedom," in this case, from various restrictions, or not quite so free
from them.
--
[...@localhost
;t think that RPMFusion provides this, but I've not been able to get to
>> the 'pay' side of the site.
> VirtualBox-OSE and the kmod packages the OP had installed are provided
> by RPMFusion.
>
> There is no "pay" side of RPMFusion.
Well, I finally made
Dear Gabriel,
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Gabriel Ramirez wrote:
seems which your machine don't have installed the kmod metapackage for
VirtualBox-OSE:
kmod-VirtualBox-OSE-3.2.6-1.fc13.8.x86_64
try the following 2 steps:
yum reinstall kmod-VirtualBox-OSE
yum update
you perfectly got the
ed to have gcc, kernel-headers,
includes, etc. for it to work.
I've it but in the last two updates it didn't work, I don't know why.
gcc, and headers are installed as well.
This may help:
http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch02.html#id2649309
I'll give a look
Also, insta
On 09/22/2010 11:01 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedorians,
> I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
>
> Unfortunately the last two kernel upgrades (2.6.34.6-54 and 2.6.34.7-56)
> didn't correspond to an upgrade of the kernel modules
orrespond to an upgrade of the kernel
> modules necessary by
> >> virtualbox (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, and vboxnetadp);
> this impedes the
> >> normal behavior of virtualbox.
>
> > Did you try running "service vboxdrv setup"? That
> should cause it to
>
On 09/22/2010 03:47 PM, James Mckenzie wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Sent: Sep 22, 2010 11:58 AM
>> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Subject: Re: kernel update breaks virtualbox
>>
>> Walter Cazzola wrote:
>>> I'm a new user of fedo
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>Sent: Sep 22, 2010 2:03 PM
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Subject: Re: kernel update breaks virtualbox
>
>James Mckenzie wrote:
>> However, a kernel update should not necessarily break its functionality.
>> This update did with obviou
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:47:51PM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote:
> You state the obvious. Virtualbox is produced by Oracle.
> However, a kernel update should not necessarily break its functionality.
> This update did with obvious results.
That'd be a reasonable expectation for us
to get to
> the 'pay' side of the site.
VirtualBox-OSE and the kmod packages the OP had installed are provided
by RPMFusion.
There is no "pay" side of RPMFusion.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://a
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>Sent: Sep 22, 2010 11:58 AM
>To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>Subject: Re: kernel update breaks virtualbox
>
>Walter Cazzola wrote:
>> I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
>
>VirtualBox is not Fedora s
Walter Cazzola wrote:
> I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
VirtualBox is not Fedora software.
Please post your message on the RPMFusion mailing list[1].
Off-topic: The problem is because you are using a kmod, which does not
automatically update
t; time I do a kernel update.
>
>>> unfortunately I can't do, when I try I get:
>
>>> >service vboxdrv setup
>>> vboxdrv: unrecognized service
>
>> Try
>
>> /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup
>
>> If that works, then chkconfig has
rv setup
vboxdrv: unrecognized service
Try
/etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup
If that works, then chkconfig has forgotten about VirtualBox, so
chkconfig --add vboxdrv
unfortunately it doesn't:
>/etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup
/etc/init.d/vboxdrv: Command not found.
Walter
--
Walte
On 09/22/2010 01:03 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> On 09/22/2010 12:01 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
>>> Dear Fedorians,
>>> I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
>
>> For w
pgrade of the kernel modules necessary by
>>> virtualbox (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, and vboxnetadp); this impedes the
>>> normal behavior of virtualbox.
>
>> Did you try running "service vboxdrv setup"? That should cause it to
>> build kernel mod
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Greg Woods wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:01 +0200, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Unfortunately the last two kernel upgrades (2.6.34.6-54 and 2.6.34.7-56)
didn't correspond to an upgrade of the kernel modules necessary by
virtualbox (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, and vboxnetadp);
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/22/2010 12:01 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
Dear Fedorians,
I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
For what its worth, I'm running 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 with upstream
(i.e. cisco repository, n
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:01 +0200, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Unfortunately the last two kernel upgrades (2.6.34.6-54 and 2.6.34.7-56)
> didn't correspond to an upgrade of the kernel modules necessary by
> virtualbox (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, and vboxnetadp); this impedes the
> n
On 09/22/2010 12:01 PM, Walter Cazzola wrote:
> Dear Fedorians,
> I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
>
For what its worth, I'm running 2.6.34.7-56.fc13.x86_64 with upstream
(i.e. cisco repository, not the OSE version) virtualbox with
Dear Fedorians,
I'm a new user of fedora 13 and I use a virtualbox installation on it.
Unfortunately the last two kernel upgrades (2.6.34.6-54 and 2.6.34.7-56)
didn't correspond to an upgrade of the kernel modules necessary by
virtualbox (vboxdrv, vboxnetflt, and vboxnetadp); this i
> If you cannot enable it in the BIOS, then you simply can't enable it,
> period. Sometimes it is not very obvious.
Well, it _is_ enabled. So in fact, I cannot disable it in the bios. KVM
works with 32 and 64 bit guests. The oracle provided rpm runs a 64bit
guest just fine. Seems to be a strange b
On 09/15/2010 04:42 PM, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Forgot to mention: I have no option for VT-x in the BIOS, but virtualbox
> and kvm both tell me, it would be enabled.
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 15.09.2010, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Athmane Madjoudj:
>
>> On 09/15/2010 05:16 PM,
Forgot to mention: I have no option for VT-x in the BIOS, but virtualbox
and kvm both tell me, it would be enabled.
Am Mittwoch, den 15.09.2010, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Athmane Madjoudj:
> On 09/15/2010 05:16 PM, Christoph Höger wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > does anyone know
On 09/15/2010 05:16 PM, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know if and how I could run a 64bit guest with the
> virtualbox-OSE package provided by rpmfusion?
>
> Currently I can only run 32 bit guests, 64bit fails silently.
>
AFAIK, VirtualBox support 64bit g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
does anyone know if and how I could run a 64bit guest with the
virtualbox-OSE package provided by rpmfusion?
Currently I can only run 32 bit guests, 64bit fails silently.
- --
Christoph Höger
Technische Universität Berlin
Fakultät IV
On 09/14/2010 11:00 AM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:55 +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to buy a server to virtualize systems via VirtualBox.
>> I can buy a 2-Xeon-processors system.
>>
>> My question is : can Virtua
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:55 +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to buy a server to virtualize systems via VirtualBox.
> I can buy a 2-Xeon-processors system.
>
> My question is : can VirtualBox use REALLY the two processors ? Wil I
> have more system resourc
Hi,
I want to buy a server to virtualize systems via VirtualBox.
I can buy a 2-Xeon-processors system.
My question is : can VirtualBox use REALLY the two processors ? Wil I
have more system resources than A single XEON processor ?
Any help would be appreciated
BR
--
users mailing list
On 5 August 2010 13:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 09:45 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
>> > yum install kernel-devel
>>
>> Shouldn't kernel-headers be enough?
>
> >From "rpm -qi kernel-devel":
>
> This package provides kernel headers and makefiles sufficient to
> b
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 09:45 -0700, suvayu ali wrote:
> > yum install kernel-devel
>
> Shouldn't kernel-headers be enough?
>From "rpm -qi kernel-devel":
This package provides kernel headers and makefiles sufficient to
build modules against the kernel package.
poc
--
users maili
.
>
> Apologies, cannot be of further help.
Frank is correct on the list.
VirtualBox user discussions list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
However all of your questions can be answered by the Virtualbox Docs.
They are very complete and easy to understand.
On 05/08/10 19:34, Aneesh K raj wrote:
> my host operating system is windows XP and within Vbox i installed fedora.
>
Is possible the Vbox mailing list you need,
as probelms might be caused by the Windows version of VBox.
Apologies, cannot be of further help.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Enc
an the VB.sh file from /media/VBox/ as root
>
> and below was the result
>
> ****
> Uncompressing VirtualBox 3.2.6 Guest Additions for Linux
> VirtualBox Guest Additions installer
> Building the VirtualBox Guest Additions kerne
/ as root
>>
>> and below was the result
>>
>>
>> Uncompressing VirtualBox 3.2.6 Guest Additions for Linux....
>> VirtualBox Guest Additions installer
>> Building the VirtualBox Guest Additions kernel modules [FAILED]
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 04:00 +, Aneesh K raj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to install guest additions on the fedora 13 in my virtual
> box..
>
> ran the VB.sh file from /media/VBox/ as root
>
> and below was the result
>
> *****
Hi,
I am trying to install guest additions on the fedora 13 in my virtual box..
ran the VB.sh file from /media/VBox/ as root
and below was the result
Uncompressing VirtualBox 3.2.6 Guest Additions for Linux
VirtualBox Guest Additions installer
On 07/06/2010 09:20 AM, Mick M. wrote:
Hi;
Kernel x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -qa VirtualBox*
VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.6_63112_fedora13-1.x86_64
This is the Oracle version, same for the fedora version.
I cannot install the OSE version as "there is no module for this kernel
Standard guarantee applies - 30 feet or 30 seconds, whichever comes first.
# find / -name "*your base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;
--- On Tue, 7/6/10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > My userneme is mick, mick is a member of mick(500), usb(503),
> > vboxusers(504).
> >
> > I have a line in fst
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:39 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > He already said he is a member of vboxusers.
>
> If you read the actual page, it gives you more things to check and
> validate (and should actually configure in Fedora). Being a member of
> vboxusers is just the start of what yo
--- On Tue, 7/6/10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Subject: Re: USB not working in VirtualBox F13
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2010, 12:32 PM
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:47 -0600,
> Christopher A. Williams w
g the OSE version.
> >
> > Have a look here:
> > http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch03.html#id2618113
> >
> > This should give you the information needed to get USB support working
> > correctly.
> >
> > Hint from this page:
> > On newer Linux
ive you the information needed to get USB support working
> correctly.
>
> Hint from this page:
> On newer Linux hosts, VirtualBox accesses USB devices through special
> files in the file system. When VirtualBox is installed, these are made
> available to all users in the vboxuse
ks for the reply, however I am not using the OSE version.
Have a look here:
http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch03.html#id2618113
This should give you the information needed to get USB support working
correctly.
Hint from this page:
On newer Linux hosts, VirtualBox accesses USB devices thro
--- On Tue, 7/6/10, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> From: Athmane Madjoudj
>
> AFAIK, OSE doesn't support USB [1]
>
> [1] http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions
>
Thanks for the reply, however I am not using the OSE version.
Mick M.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/06/2010 02:20 PM, Mick M. wrote:
> Hi;
> Kernel x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
> [r...@localhost ~]# rpm -qa VirtualBox*
> VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.6_63112_fedora13-1.x86_64
>
> This is the Oracle version, same for the fedora version.
> I cannot install the OSE version as "t
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 06:20 -0700, Mick M. wrote:
> Hi;
> Kernel x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
> [r...@localhost ~]# rpm -qa VirtualBox*
> VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.6_63112_fedora13-1.x86_64
>
> This is the Oracle version, same for the fedora version.
> I cannot install the OSE version a
Hi;
Kernel x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
[r...@localhost ~]# rpm -qa VirtualBox*
VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.6_63112_fedora13-1.x86_64
This is the Oracle version, same for the fedora version.
I cannot install the OSE version as "there is no module for this kernel"
My userneme is mick, mick is a memb
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:21:29PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Paul wrote:
> > Please, could you rebuild the latest rawhide kernels the modules
> > required for VirtualBox-OSE? The latest ones are ages old and won't work
> > unless I'm using a seriously old
Paul wrote:
> Please, could you rebuild the latest rawhide kernels the modules
> required for VirtualBox-OSE? The latest ones are ages old and won't work
> unless I'm using a seriously old kernel.
You should post at the rpmfusion lists[1].
P.S. this is why I despise kmods.
Hi,
Please, could you rebuild the latest rawhide kernels the modules
required for VirtualBox-OSE? The latest ones are ages old and won't work
unless I'm using a seriously old kernel.
I would do it, but can't get the things to build!
TTFN
Paul
P.S. VirtualBox-OSE-devel won'
Hi,
Trying to get VirtualBox-OSE to run with the current rawhide kernel
(2.6.34-11.fc14.i686) and it's complaining that it can't find the
vboxdrv, vboxnetflt and vboxnetadp modules.
Has anyone got it running with newer rawhide kernels? I've got it happy
with 2.6.34-0.49.rc7.git0.f
ov 7
> 21:25:57 EST 2009
> > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> >>
>
> >> 在2010-04-10 11:11:53，-andria- 写
> 道：
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have installed
11:11:53，-andria- 写道：
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> I have installed VirtualBox,
> >> $ rpm -qa | grep -i virtualbox
> >> VirtualBox-3.1-3.1.6_59338_
> >> fedora12-1.i686
> >>
> >> and sucessfully recompiled, lin
On 04/10/2010 01:51 PM, David Bartmess wrote:
> I'm in the process of installing a new VM on VirtualBox under Fedora 12,
> and was wondering about the placement of files. To be short, where would
> the VM put any files that are created by, say Quicken. Are they saved in
> a s
2010/4/10 Paul Smith :
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:19 AM, -andria- wrote:
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux tambora 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:25:57 EST 2009
<--SNIP-->>>>
>>> what does it mean?
>
> Try to install VirtualBox-OSE from the
I'm in the process of installing a new VM on VirtualBox under Fedora 12,
and was wondering about the placement of files. To be short, where would
the VM put any files that are created by, say Quicken. Are they saved in
a specific directory, or are they bundled into the VM disk file?
Basi
-andria- wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM, wrote:
>
>> from CHINA?:) "failed: /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so">there is a
>> problem in this file：“VirtualBox.soâ€
>
> no. I don't know why gmail gives that characthers :(
> thanks
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 10:11 +0700, -andria- wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have installed VirtualBox,
> $ rpm -qa | grep -i virtualbox
> VirtualBox-3.1-3.1.6_59338_
> fedora12-1.i686
>
> and sucessfully recompiled, linux kernel with VirtualBox module.
> Removing o
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:19 AM, -andria- wrote:
> $ uname -a
> Linux tambora 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:25:57 EST 2009
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> 在2010-04-10 11:11:53，-andria- 写道：
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have installed
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:59 AM, wrote:
> from CHINA?:) "failed: /usr/lib/virtualbox/VirtualBox.so">there is a
> problem in this file：“VirtualBox.so”
>
>
no. I don't know why gmail gives that characthers :(
thanks, but how can I solve that.
$ uname -a
Linux
Dear all,
I have installed VirtualBox,
$ rpm -qa | grep -i virtualbox
VirtualBox-3.1-3.1.6_59338_
fedora12-1.i686
and sucessfully recompiled, linux kernel with VirtualBox module.
Removing old VirtualBox kernel module [ OK ]
Recompiling VirtualBox kernel module
on 04/09/2010 09:15 AM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> what do you get for "cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep svm"
nothing
> what model cpus do you have?
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model
model : 35
model name : Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 165
model : 35
model name : Dual Co
ady explained this. On the Pentium 4, which does not have hardware
> virtualization, KVM is so slow that it is unusable (it takes 10 minutes
> to boot a Windows XP VM). Therefore I use VirtualBox instead
its not using kvm since kvm requires hardware support, just plain qemu which
is slow, you could ge
le (it takes 10 minutes
to boot a Windows XP VM). Therefore I use VirtualBox instead.
On the Core Duo at work, which does have hardware virtualization, KVM
performance is good, but the VM crashes as soon as I access it in the
morning if it is left idle overnight, and I have to reboot the VM. This
7;s as guests. from fedora
to rhel, to debian, and open solaris. im not running windows guests so im not
sure how they work.
> For what it's worth, Xen is supported by Red Hat in RHEL 5 (and
> therefore by CentOS 5 as well), despite not being part of mainline.
> VirtualBox is of c
#x27;s that simple.
For what it's worth, Xen is supported by Red Hat in RHEL 5 (and
therefore by CentOS 5 as well), despite not being part of mainline.
VirtualBox is of course "on your own", but I have never had a problem
getting the kernel modules to build. I *have* had that probl
On Friday 09 April 2010 07:26:23 am oleksandr korneta wrote:
> on 04/08/2010 04:34 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Thursday 08 April 2010 01:48:33 pm oleksandr korneta wrote:
> >> cannot recompile VirtualBox driver module after recent kernel update
> >>
> >>
on 04/08/2010 04:34 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday 08 April 2010 01:48:33 pm oleksandr korneta wrote:
>> cannot recompile VirtualBox driver module after recent kernel update
>>
>> $ rpm -qa | grep kernel
>> kernel-2.6.32.10-90.fc12.x86_64
>> kernel-
on 04/08/2010 03:36 PM Kwan Lowe wrote:
> This thread has a fix:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vbox-us...@virtualbox.org/msg07263.html
>
> In short, you're adding a one line change to a file (including sched.h).
thanks, it worked.
--
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta
I'm running F12 x86_64, should th
Greg Woods wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:34 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> Im curious why you use virtualbox and not kvm/libvirt/virt-manager that are
>> included by default in fedora? Im just trying to work out what is lacking
>> in
>> the default offerings t
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 15:34 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> Im curious why you use virtualbox and not kvm/libvirt/virt-manager that are
> included by default in fedora? Im just trying to work out what is lacking in
> the default offerings that you go to a third party.
I can
601 - 700 of 719 matches
Mail list logo
