Well, Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that issue?
Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@li
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:10:00 +1100
Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
> Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
Shhh! Don't give them ideas! :-).
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guide
On 21/10/12 08:10, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
Well,
Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
issue? Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2
On 10/21/2012 09:10 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
Well,
Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
issue? Will we ever gonna see wayland replacing X?
The Wayland project is very much alive and well.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Patrick Lists <
fedora-l...@puzzled.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 09:10 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf wrote:
>
>> Well,
>>
>> Back in 2010 I heard f15 will feature experimental wayland support (from
>> Alan Jackson AKA ajax). Anyone knows what's the latest update on that
On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
[snip]
I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
I'm not a developer but my guess is that X's 25 year old codebase is
dragging along a tremendous amou
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shiny and new and written from scratch, so obvio
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:05:36 +0200 Patrick Lists
wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> [snip]
> > I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
> >
> > What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> I'm not a developer but my g
On 10/21/2012 01:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shin
Christopher Svanefalk:
>> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Tom Horsley:
> Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
> for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
> shiny and new and written from scratch, so obviously it
> is better.
The most significant change wayland will bring over X is the ability to
softwares directly talking to hardwares instead of middlewares. Less hangup and
stuffs.
Junayeed Ahnaf Nirjhor
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On 10/21/2012 07:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
shi
On 10/21/2012 09:59 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
http://lwn.net/Articles/517375/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protocol)
Wayland lacks a lot of features that exist in X.org, currently. I think
the idea th
On 10/22/2012 01:31 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/21/2012 09:59 AM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
http://lwn.net/Articles/517375/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayland_(display_server_protocol)
Wayland lacks a lot of features that e
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:05:36 +0200
Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 06:59 PM, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> [snip]
> > I have not been following this closely, but it sure looks interesting.
> >
> > What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> I'm not a developer but my g
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:18:36AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Christopher Svanefalk:
> >> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> Tom Horsley:
> > Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
> > for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
> > shi
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:40:49PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 01:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
> >Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> >
> >>What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
> >Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatib
17 matches
Mail list logo