Am 20.09.2013 22:59, schrieb Mike Wright:
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used mostly
as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-archive.repo:
[archive]
name=Fedora 14 - i386
Am 21.09.2013 00:04, schrieb Mike Wright:
09/20/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
the problem?
No idea. Would not install f12 either. Liked f10
this is *not* a helpful reply
what no idea?
how far do you come with the
Allegedly, on or about 21 September 2013, Pete Stieber sent:
On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW
MW How did you do that? What a great way
MW to follow who is on a thread.
MW Seems to me to make it more personal.
MW
MW Very nice.
I noticed
On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW
MW How did you do that? What a great way
MW to follow who is on a thread.
MW Seems to me to make it more personal.
MW
MW Very nice.
I noticed this format on the wxWidgets mailing list. I believe one of
the
On 09/21/2013 10:10 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
PS MW MW = Mike Wright wrote:
PS MW MW
PS MW How did you do that? What a great way
PS MW to follow who is on a thread.
PS MW Seems to me to make it more personal.
PS MW
PS MW Very nice.
PS
PS I
On 9/20/2013 4:04 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW MW
MW How did you do that? What a great way
MW to follow who is on a thread.
MW Seems to me to make it more personal.
MW
MW Very nice.
On 09/21/2013 10:10 PM, PS = Pete Stieber wrote:
PS I noticed this format on
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-archive.repo:
[archive]
name=Fedora 14 - i386
failovermethod=priority
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
fedora-archive.repo:
[archive]
name=Fedora 14 -
Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
the problem?
Ranjan
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:39:48 -0700 Rick Stevens ri...@alldigital.com
wrote:
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:59:20PM -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14,
Did you try the netinstall image? If the problem with the installer is
about the graphics, did you try the basic graphics mode? It is
available under the
09/20/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Btw, I do wonder why this laptop will not install past F14what is
the problem?
No idea. Would not install f12 either. Liked f10.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 9/20/2013 3:23 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW Anybody have any idea where the archived
MW *updates* repo may be?
http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/updates/
Pete
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 09/20/2013 03:23 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
09/20/2013 02:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update
09/20/2013 02:39 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/20/2013 01:59 PM, Mike Wright issued this missive:
Hi all,
I have an very old and cranky laptop that won't install past f14, used
mostly as a scanner/print station.
I'm trying to update some of its software using yum. I created a repo,
09/20/2013 03:36 PM, Pete Stieber wrote:
On 9/20/2013 3:23 PM, MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW Anybody have any idea where the archived
MW *updates* repo may be?
Going OT.
MW = Mike Wright wrote:
MW
How did you do that? What a great way to follow who is on a thread.
Seems to me to make it
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/05/12 15:57, Andre Robatino wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic post, but I'm not sure what else to do. The Flash
plugin
was updated to 11.2.202.235 about a week ago.
snipped
This may be the answer:
and they promptly
closed it as NotABug. There is an updated RPM at
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ under .rpm for other Linux but I'm not sure
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
people please vote
,
providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
people please vote for my bug in the hope of getting someone at Adobe to wake
up? Thanks.
Adobe drops Flash for Linux except in Google Chrome
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Adobe-Drops-Flash-for-Linux-Except-in-Google
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
people please vote for my bug in the hope of getting someone at Adobe to
wake
up? Thanks.
Adobe drops Flash for Linux except in Google Chrome
On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
It is built in to chrome and currently at FlashPlayer_11_2_202_235_FlashPlayer
in
Chrome 18.0.1025.168
--
Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on
the joke
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzin foxec...@wowway.com wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
Mi guess is that Chrome features Flash as an internal component and it
uses Chrome's internal auto-update mechanism?
FC
--
users mailing list
On 05/10/2012 09:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Terry Polzinfoxec...@wowway.com wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
Mi guess is that Chrome features Flash as an internal component and it
uses Chrome's internal auto-update mechanism?
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yum repo implies a promise that it will be kept updated. Could
people please vote for my bug in the hope of getting someone at Adobe to
wake
up? Thanks.
Adobe drops Flash for Linux except in Google Chrome
://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bugid=3185733 and they promptly
closed it as NotABug. There is an updated RPM at
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ under .rpm for other Linux but I'm not sure
if it's identical to what the repo is supposed to provide. In any case,
providing a yum repo implies a promise
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
It is built in to chrome and currently at
FlashPlayer_11_2_202_235_FlashPlayer in
Chrome 18.0.1025.168
Only on i686.
On 05/11/2012 08:11 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:58 PM, Terry Polzin wrote:
You still need the update for flash in chrome to work.
It is built in to chrome and currently at
On 05/10/2012 07:11 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
Only on i686. x86_64 users still need to grab the plugin from Adobe.
It's actually back in the unstable 64-bit version,
google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1130.1-135886.x86_64.
--
to makes this shorter:
* what shows cat /etc/redhat-release
* what says rpm -qa | grep release
it si not normal that anything is using wrong repos
if there are no manually crapped repo-files under
/etc/yum.repos.d/ and the current release-package
is installed correctly
signature.asc
Am 17.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
I ran:
[mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release
fedora-release-13-1.noarch
fedora-release-14-1.noarch
[mlapier@mushroom ~]$
[root@mushroom ~]# yum erase fedora-release-13-1.noarch
I immediately got an update notice.
Thanks for the help
On 07/17/2011 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
to makes this shorter:
* what shows cat /etc/redhat-release
* what says rpm -qa | grep release
it si not normal that anything is using wrong repos
if there are no manually crapped repo-files under
/etc/yum.repos.d/ and the current
On 07/17/2011 06:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.07.2011 23:35, schrieb Mark LaPierre:
I ran:
[mlapier@mushroom ~]$ rpm -q fedora-release
fedora-release-13-1.noarch
fedora-release-14-1.noarch
[mlapier@mushroom ~]$
[root@mushroom ~]# yum erase fedora-release-13-1.noarch
I immediately
On 07/17/2011 04:45 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 20:29:03 -0400, ML (Mark) wrote:
I just tried:
[root@mushroom ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit
Found 15 installed debuginfo package(s)
Enabling fedora-debuginfo:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 11:10:12 -0400, ML (Mark) wrote:
I spent some time in Google looking for instructions on how to 'verify
the version of your fedora-release package' but came up empty. Could
you elucidate this point more thoroughly.
You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered
On Sunday, July 17, 2011 12:20:46 Michael Schwendt wrote:
You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the man rpm
manual. For example, run
rpm -v fedora-release
I think you mean
rpm -q fedora-release
--
Garry Williams
--
users mailing list
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:29:46 -0400, GTW (Garry) wrote:
You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the man rpm
manual. For example, run
rpm -v fedora-release
I think you mean
rpm -q fedora-release
Yes, it was just a typo.
--
users mailing list
On 07/17/2011 12:31 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 12:29:46 -0400, GTW (Garry) wrote:
You would learn about RPM and basic queries as covered by the man rpm
manual. For example, run
rpm -v fedora-release
I think you mean
rpm -q fedora-release
Yes, it was just a
Hello everyone,
It's really tough to compile gccsense by oneself. Would it be possible
to add it to the yum repo?
Thanks.
Regards,
H Xu
05/04/2011
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 01/28/2011 05:45 AM, mattias wrote:
If i have a fedora 13 iso dvd image Can I use the iso as an yum repo?
I no I can use a physical cd
you can mount and iso image as a 'loop device' and access files same
as if using a burned cd/dvd.
see;
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/how-to-mount-iso
If i have a fedora 13 iso dvd image
Can I use the iso as an yum repo?
I no I can use a physical cd
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Am 10.02.2010 17:15, schrieb Rashedul Arefin:
Dear All:
I am very new to Fedora. I have installed fedora 12. Is there any way to
install rpm packages with dependencies from local drive? I have
downloaded many rpm packages, but I dont know how to install these.
Any help would be appreciable.
, (google is your friend here)
I think that will help your understanding of how it all comes together.
---
Kind Regards,
Mr Gabriel (bberry mail)
-Original Message-
From: Rashedul Arefin rashed...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:15:07
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: yum repo
41 matches
Mail list logo
