On 12/15/2011 05:34 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
A new error now being reported is this: Can't open
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases for append. and then results in Unit
dhcpd.service entered failed state. - I navigated to that file using
Konqueror running as root, and the file is there and I was able to
On 12/16/2011 10:28 AM, Claude Jones wrote:
On 12/15/2011 05:34 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
A new error now being reported is this: Can't open
/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases for append. and then results in Unit
dhcpd.service entered failed state. - I navigated to that file using
Konqueror running as
The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.2.100 192.168.2.199;
option routers 192.168.2.1;
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
From my messages log, it says:
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1
On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
range 192.168.2.100 192.168.2.199;
option routers 192.168.2.1;
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
From my messages log, it
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
...
Try 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0
typo - your net is 192.168.2.0 / 255.255.255.0
--
Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0: bad
subnet number/mask combination.
Can anyone spot what's wrong with that subnet number/mask combo?
192.168.2.1 is not a subnet, 192.168.2.0 is
signature.asc
Description:
On 12/15/2011 04:23 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 12/15/2011 04:10 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
The relevant line from my dhcpd.conf is the top one here:
subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
...
Try 192.168.1.0 / 255.255.255.0
On 12/15/2011 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0: bad
subnet number/mask combination.
Can anyone spot what's wrong with that subnet number/mask combo?
192.168.2.1 is not a subnet,
Am 15.12.2011 22:56, schrieb Claude Jones:
On 12/15/2011 04:28 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.12.2011 22:10, schrieb Claude Jones:
/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf line 9: subnet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0:
bad subnet number/mask combination.
Can anyone spot what's wrong with that subnet
On 12/15/2011 05:04 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
my whole dhcpd.conf file
this has nothing to do with your dhcpd.conf
look at your /etc/sysconfig/dhcpd AND you network-config of the machine
has the machine a 192.168.2.x address?
this below is my config for having dhcp only on internal subnet
On 12/15/2011 04:45 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
I tried both suggestions, singly, and both together though I didn't
think the forward slash in lieu of netmask was right.
Nothing worked. It's so strange...
bah sorry - the / wasn't supposed to be literal ... i just meant
change the .1 to .0 to
On 12/15/2011 05:57 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
I see you have fixed that now but have fallen into a different problem:-)
yeah, layered issues - I'm on #3 now...
--
Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
12 matches
Mail list logo
