===
>
>
> > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM
> > From: "Rick Stevens" <ri...@alldigital.com>
> > To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Subject: Re: jre
> >
t; To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: jre
>
> On 05/20/2016 10:21 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> >
> > OK,
> >
> > but it seems that it also needs
> > javaw
> > which is not provided.
>
port for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: jre
On 05/20/2016 09:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank you.
But:
Package java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.91-2.b14.fc22.x86_64 is already installed,
skipping.
which jre returns:
/usr/bin/which: no jre in
(/root/bin:/usr/lib64/q
20, 2016 at 6:41 PM
> From: "Rick Stevens" <ri...@alldigital.com>
> To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: jre
>
> On 05/20/2016 09:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Thank you.
> >
> > But:
&g
On 05/20/2016 09:31 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank you.
But:
Package java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.91-2.b14.fc22.x86_64 is already installed,
skipping.
which jre returns:
/usr/bin/which: no jre in
(/root/bin:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr
Thank you.
But:
Package java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.91-2.b14.fc22.x86_64 is already installed,
skipping.
which jre returns:
/usr/bin/which: no jre in
(/root/bin:/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin:/usr/lib64/ccache:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin)
So
On 05/20/2016 08:27 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I wish to install on application (jpicedt) which requires jre.
Which jre install ?
The package is java-1.8.0-openjdk, but "dnf install jre" will work.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscripti
Hello,
I wish to install on application (jpicedt) which requires jre.
Which jre install ?
Thank for your help.
Regards.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:46:12 -0400
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
No, apparently there is no Java at all on the liveCD... :-(
I assume you mean the Xfce live media here... there's lots of Fedora
LiveCd's. ;)
$ java
bash: java: command not found
[liveuser@localhost ~]$
I got
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:29:55 -0300
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the
Xfce ISO did not build it exactly to your, personal specifications?
Really? How
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:35 AM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
most people don't need Java so it's space was
replaced with something useful to many.
Please dont confuse needing Java with that myopic/biased view of
Java as applets.
There's plenty of useful cross platform Java apps out there. I
On 7/21/2013 5:40 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:35 AM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
most people don't need Java so it's space was
replaced with something useful to many.
Please dont confuse needing Java with that myopic/biased view of
Java as applets.
There's
On 07/20/2013 02:29 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daviddgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the Xfce
ISO did not build it exactly to your, personal specifications? Really?
How dare them to not build one just for
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 9:06 PM, nomnex nom...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, thanks Fernando. I too was used to see OpenJDK include in the
live CD by force of habit.
Good to know I wasn't the only one.
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
- George
Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include
the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?.
This causes me lots of hassle.
:-(
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the last
minute due to space limitations
The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB apparently as
the CD size?
F19 XFCE ISO image:
HTTP
Hi
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include
the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?.
This causes me lots of hassle.
Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the
last minute due
Hi
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why are they still using 650MB apparently as
the CD size?
You never mentioned that you were using the Xfce image and yes, Xfce still
targets CD size
Rahul
--
users mailing list
Hi
Oh, I see you did and I missed that. In any case, Xfce target is CD Size
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:27:15 -0400
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram
methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped
in the last minute due to space limitations
The ISO isn't even 700MB! Why
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 15:13:14 -0400,
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include
the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?.
You are not being excellent.
This causes me lots of hassle.
You can build your own custom live images
Summary
==
Install 1 Package (+8 Dependent packages)
Total download size: 29 M
(no need to reply, I' m just gathering data about OpenJDK 7 JRE size,
and posted this to help someone else looking for this info later, I
thought it might be useful :)
FC
On 7/19/2013 3:13 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
Who was the genius who decided Fedora 19 XFCE should no longer include
the OpenJDK 7 JRE like F18 did?.
This causes me lots of hassle.
:-(
FC
So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the Xfce
ISO did not build
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
For example the OpenJDK 8 version might have been picked up. (I didn't check
to see if that was what happened, but rather it is a plausible cause that
might have changed things without any of the XFCE guys noticing.)
No,
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:47:12 -0400
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently the RPMs are 29MB compressed, including all deps...
# yum install java-1.7.0-openjdk
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Well, thanks Fernando. I too was
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 15:27:15 -0400,
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Desktop team manages the live cd. Several packages were dropped in the last
minute due to space limitations
The ISO isn't even 700MB!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:36 PM, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
So what you are complaining about is that the people that made the Xfce
ISO did not build it exactly to your, personal specifications? Really?
How dare them to not build one just for you!!
No, re-read my message. Im saying that
I prefer OpenJDK
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 13.05.2013 20:34, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 13.05.2013 20:34, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
I could be
On 05/15/2013 08:53 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
So, let's all do it right and use openBSD?
Installing only what you need has really not much in common with
switching to a entirely different operating system.
But I find the conflicting directions in Fedora a bit perplexing, of late.
Needs more
Am 13.05.2013 20:34, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
I could be wrong, but I believe the current OpenJDK and Icedtea-web
approach is NOT to run unsigned
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
I could be wrong, but I believe the current OpenJDK and Icedtea-web
approach is NOT to run unsigned applets by default, and modern
browsers (ie
Am 04.05.2013 00:01, schrieb Jim:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
java-1.7.0-openjdk
icedtea-web
icedtea-web is the browser-plugin
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
do NOT install it if you are not really use it!
I could be wrong, but I believe the current OpenJDK and Icedtea-web
approach is NOT to run unsigned applets by default, and modern
browsers (ie Mozilla's Firefox) now
On 04.05.2013 09:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2013 03:19, schrieb poma:
On 04.05.2013 00:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2013 00:26, schrieb poma: On 04.05.2013 00:01, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
alternatives
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 04.05.2013 00:01, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
alternatives --config java ;)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
LONG ANSWER:
OpenJDK7 is the reference implementation of JDK7
Hence, Oracle programmers work on OpenJDK 7 (and 8, and 9...).
The web
On 04.05.2013 00:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2013 00:26, schrieb poma: On 04.05.2013 00:01, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
alternatives --config java ;)
is not a package isn't it?
please do not answer if you do
On 05/03/2013 06:26 PM, poma wrote:
On 04.05.2013 00:01, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
alternatives --config java ;)
This lets hin pick from packages already installed on his system.
yum whatprovides jre
will tell him
On 04.05.2013 04:25, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
On 05/03/2013 06:26 PM, poma wrote:
On 04.05.2013 00:01, Jim wrote:
Fedora 18 ,is there openJRE instead of Oracles JRE ?
What Packages would I download ?
alternatives --config java ;)
This lets hin pick from packages already installed on his
On 01/06/11 01:35, Antonio Olivares wrote:
I am happily running Fedora 15 on several boxes. Our school will be
switching from VistaNet to PowerSchool Online systems by Pearsons.
We used to do attendance/grading on Vistanet and now we will use
Powerschool online Gradebook which appears to
* Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com [2011-05-31 20:35]:
Dear folks,
I am happily running Fedora 15 on several boxes. Our school will be
switching from VistaNet to PowerSchool Online systems by Pearsons. We used
to do attendance/grading on Vistanet and now we will use Powerschool
Dear folks,
I am happily running Fedora 15 on several boxes. Our school will be switching
from VistaNet to PowerSchool Online systems by Pearsons. We used to do
attendance/grading on Vistanet and now we will use Powerschool online Gradebook
which appears to need java to run. On one of my
have
java already as I run the testers:
http://www.java.com/en/download/testjava.jsp
and it returns that java is present.
but there is no rpm reported back:
[olivares@acer-aspire-1 ~]$ rpm -qa java
[olivares@acer-aspire-1 ~]$
java is provided by the jre (Java Runtime Environment
Oh, forgot to add
What you really want is to do
yum whatprovides *bin/java
Ed
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 06/01/2011 09:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Oh, forgot to add
What you really want is to do
yum whatprovides *bin/java
Ed
Oh, and I think I was mistaken with my first answeras I didn't do
what I said you should do and was mislead by a symbolic link. Very
sorry
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 09:43 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Oh, forgot to add
What you really want is to do
yum whatprovides *bin/java
Ed
Oh, and I think I was mistaken with my first answeras I didn't do
what I said you
On 17 October 2010 03:20, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
I ran the commands and everything compared, but when I ran;
# /usr/sbin/alternatives --config libjavaplugin.so
It ran , but I did not get the result shown below
There is 1 program that provides 'libjavaplugin.so'.
Selection
On 17 October 2010 08:47, Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/sbin/alternatives --install
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin.so libjavaplugin.so
/usr/java/default/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so 2
Obviously you need to type the above in a single line (it was broken
in pieces by the mailer).
--
(it was broken
in pieces by the mailer).
I put all three commands , shown above on one line with spaces between
each command and it ran , but still no Jre in Firefox .
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins has bothlibjavaplugin.so and libnpjp2.so
in it.
libjavaplugin.sois link to/etc
On 10/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jim wrote:
Go to about:plugins - and check for multiple versions of jre - if so
disable the undesirable ones.
I dont use firefox anymore (switched to google-chrome) but I'm pretty
sure there is a way to choose when conflicting plugins provide same service.
May
On 10/17/2010 12:18 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jim wrote:
Go to about:plugins - and check for multiple versions of jre - if so
disable the undesirable ones.
I dont use firefox anymore (switched to google-chrome) but I'm pretty
sure there is a way to choose
On 10/17/2010 12:26 PM, Jim wrote:
On 10/17/2010 12:18 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jim wrote:
Go to about:plugins - and check for multiple versions of jre - if so
disable the undesirable ones.
I dont use firefox anymore (switched to google-chrome) but I'm
On 17 October 2010 17:26, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
There is nothing about jre or java in about:plugins ,
Things to try:
1. Do you still have in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins a
ln -s /usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so?
If so, and you added the other link to /libjavaplugin.so
On 10/17/2010 12:32 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/17/2010 12:26 PM, Jim wrote:
On 10/17/2010 12:18 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 10/17/2010 11:45 AM, Jim wrote:
Go to about:plugins - and check for multiple versions of jre - if so
disable the undesirable ones.
I dont use
On 17 October 2010 18:39, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
i believe you can rename that (or delete it) and it will be recreated
but that probably wont help.
/pluginreg.dat has all the same thing that shows up in about:plugins
Exactly, that file is a sort of cache. If the file is deleted
to type the above in a single line (it was broken
in pieces by the mailer).
I put all three commands , shown above on one line with spaces between
each command and it ran , but still no Jre in Firefox .
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins has bothlibjavaplugin.so and libnpjp2.so
I have in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins a ln -s
/usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/lib/i386/libnpjp2.sobut the jre won't show in
about:plugins .
What am I missing
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 17 October 2010 00:15, Jim binary...@comcast.net wrote:
I have in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins a ln -s
/usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so but the jre won't show in
about:plugins .
What am I missing
This is what I have (and it works):
[r...@dell-d3000
On 10/16/2010 07:27 PM, Piscium wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:15, Jimbinary...@comcast.net wrote:
I have in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins a ln -s
/usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/lib/i386/libnpjp2.sobut the jre won't show in
about:plugins .
What am I missing
This is what I have (and it works
Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get it to show
after starting about:plugins in firefox .
I wonder if there is
On 10/12/2010 02:49 PM, jim wrote:
Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get it to show
after starting about:plugins
/libjavaplugin.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 Aug 31 09:31
/etc/alternatives/libjavaplugin.so -
/usr/java/default/jre/lib/i386/libnpjp2.so
[23:13 s...@rackspace ~ ]
$ ls -al /usr/java/default
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Mar 3 2010 /usr/java/default - /usr/java/latest/
[23:13 s...@rackspace ~ ]
$ ls -al /usr
On 10/12/2010 06:16 PM, JD wrote:
On 10/12/2010 02:49 PM, jim wrote:
Fc13-i686 /Kde New install
I have jre1.6.0_21 installed and ln -s to, in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
There is no plugins directory in /usr/lib/firefox.
I tried libjavaplugin_oji.so and libnpjp2.so but I can't get
java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-42.b18.fc13.i686
java_cup-0.11a-4.fc13.noarch
java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel-1.6.0.0-42.b18.fc13.i686
jre-1.6.0_21-fcs.i586
You should have a directory
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
In that dir, there should be a symlink:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 Aug 14 16:15
Thanks to the suggestion of Pscium, I removed the openjdk and installed the
java jre. The non trivial instructions do to this are at:
fedorasolved.org/browser-solutions/java-i386
I use the x86_64 version of firefox, so used the 64 bit version of java jre.
Unfortunately, to see the problem
FC13 i686
Doesn't doing a ln -s
/usr/java/jre1.6.0_21/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin.oji.so work anymore,
the link is showing in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
About:plugins in firefox does not show a jre plugin.
Boy these changes every week can STRESS a guy out.
--
users mailing list
users
Did you check whether the IcedTea plugin is installed? The IcedTea
plugin represents jre.
if not installed do:
yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-41.b18.fc13.x86_64
(select the right architecture)
suomi
On 2010-08-10 17:10, binary...@comcast.net wrote:
FC13 i686
Doesn't doing
in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
About:plugins in firefox does not show a jre plugin.
Boy these changes every week can STRESS a guy out.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 08/10/2010 11:20 AM, fedora wrote:
Did you check whether the IcedTea plugin is installed? The IcedTea
plugin represents jre.
if not installed do:
yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-41.b18.fc13.x86_64
(select the right architecture)
suomi
On 2010-08-10 17:10, binary
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 4:56 AM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Not really. Sun's JRE will install over the top of an existing JRE
install. However, if it breaks, you get to keep the results. I also
have a lot of fun installing the JDK on Sun systems and RHEL/RHAS
systems
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
That is why there are left various prior Sun Jre's,
that you can safely remove after a fresh update.
Have done it many times, the old stuff it still there.
Oh, really.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing
On 09/08/10 11:11, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
That is why there are left various prior Sun Jre's,
that you can safely remove after a fresh update.
Have done it many times, the old stuff it still there.
Oh, really.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, just check the java applet.
Sure.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 02/08/10 13:22, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional
On 09/08/10 00:26, James McKenzie wrote:
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
Not really. Sun's JRE will install over the top of an existing JRE
install. However, if it breaks, you get to keep the results. I also
have a lot
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Christofer C. Bell
christofer.c.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, the guy who reported that bug is a huge jerk. Do you all have to
put up with that kind of name calling and general unpleasantness
often?
Why do you say like that?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
LOL! Not very often, no.
Thanks for the sympathy. :-)
Reporting bugs is good because many people see and the one who thinks
for it, could resolve also or the community in aggregation.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
On 08/04/2010 12:45 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
LOL! Not very often, no.
Thanks for the sympathy. :-)
Reporting bugs is good because many people see and the one who thinks
for it, could resolve also or the community in aggregation.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Reporting bugs is just fine but not in the language used by the
reporter. If you are using for a bug to be fixed in a free software
project, being polite would get you further along than ranting.
This is very correct.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Not a problem. I tries to play chess at,
http://www.pogo.com/action/pogo/signin.do
* Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com [2010-08-03 05:29]:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Not a problem. I tries
On 08/03/2010 03:31 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com [2010-08-03 05:29]:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com wrote:
Out of curiosity -- if you don't mind me asking, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
H. We may have to fix it eventually.
Yes, humans can do that also.
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Not a problem. I tries to play chess at,
http://www.pogo.com/action/pogo/signin.do?returnType=gamereturnValue=chess2
Ah, yes sorry. That is this unfixable bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452435 :(
Wow, the guy who reported
, why do you need the Sun
JDK? Does the OpenJDK jre not work for what you are trying to do?
Not a problem. I tries to play chess at,
http://www.pogo.com/action/pogo/signin.do?returnType=gamereturnValue=chess2
Ah, yes sorry. That is this unfixable bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
I have installed JRE (Sun Java) according to the website:
http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
But the matter is that the installed version is JRE 1.6.0 Update 20
and have disabled Open JDK, but how to update this JRE (Sun Java) in
the terminal?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users
On 02/08/10 13:09, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
I have installed JRE (Sun Java) according to the website:
http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
But the matter is that the installed version is JRE 1.6.0 Update 20
and have disabled Open JDK, but how to update this JRE (Sun Java
On 02/08/10 13:22, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
friend of fedora, i was asking for update only and not reinstalling!!
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
--
Regards
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
Really?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda mli...@mjmwired.com wrote:
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
I installed using the following:
http://sites.google.com/site/indiadoor/java-jre
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda mli...@mjmwired.com wrote:
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
Oh, I installed using 'yum'!
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
On 02/08/10 16:09, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot update jre, it is always a full clean out (optional) and
reinstall.
Even on Windows
Really?
You get to keep the pieces.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Parshwa Murdia b330...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Miranda mli...@mjmwired.com wrote:
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update is just one single 'rpm' command.
I
On 02/08/10 16:25, Mauriat Miranda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Parshwa Murdiab330...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Mauriat Mirandamli...@mjmwired.com wrote:
If you install the Sun JRE using the RPM and made sure to setup the
proper symlinks, then the update
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
You get to keep the pieces.
No, two parts are not pieces, more that that is pieces!
:)
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
the Sun JRE RPM and
setup all the proper links.
Ok. It means now it is not possible to update Java (in the present scenario).
Similar amount of work, but the RPM I think is easier.
Yes.
Also, the Sun JRE is not included in the standard fedora YUM repositories.
Ok.
Thanks.
--
Regards
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
:)
:):)
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
