2016-02-22 12:07 GMT+01:00 thibaut noah :
> Failing at step 7 :
> http://fpaste.org/327222/39094145/
> Error seems to be related to ssl, maybe a certificate creation for the
> kernel that fails?
>
> ps : Fixed the HUNK failed by adding the line directly into the quirks.c
>
2016-02-21 17:32 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl :
> 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack it into /usr/src
> 2. Take a look into /boot and grab the config of your recent Fedora
> kernel. Example: config-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64
> 3. Rename this file to ".config" and copy it
2016-02-21 9:38 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl :
> Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz.
> It applies cleanly:
>
> [root@chiara linux-4.4.2]# cat quirk.diff | patch -p2
> patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c
>
>
> diff -urN a/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>
2016-02-21 17:32 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl :
> How to build a recent "Fedora kernel for the unexperienced":
>
> 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack it into /usr/src
> 2. Take a look into /boot and grab the config of your recent Fedora
> kernel. Example:
On 21.02.2016, Heinz Diehl wrote:
[]
Daah, today's not my day. Should have used a spelling & grammar
correction, sorry for the broken English :-(
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 21.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote:
> So i have no way to use this patch on 4.4.2 since i have no way to run it,
> i'm already lost with patching my kernel i can't build my own package.
How to build a recent "Fedora kernel for the unexperienced":
1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and
2016-02-21 9:38 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl :
> Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz.
> It applies cleanly
>
Current kernel is 4.3.5 through dnf update.
There is still no easy way to get a 4.4.1 kernel on fedora since it seems
one has to build his own
On 20/02/16 22:27, Ntlworld wrote:
> Because my friend not many of us in this day & age have time to
> spend cutting & pasting bits of an email chain!
You're thinking about this the wrong way. Not many of us in "this day
and age" have enough time to read email. For every email you write
there
On 20.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote:
> I got the patch from here :
> https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/
> A modify version which is the most recent version of this patch i could
> find.
Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2
On 2016-02-20 15:00, thibaut noah wrote:
First of all i'm not a kid, i'm 28 years old thank you.
Barely an adult. Probably doesn't pee in his pants anymore. Possible alleges to
a college graduation.
{^_-} From my vantage point his a really callow child little more than 1/3 my
age.
--
On 02/20/2016 02:23 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
if you want people to follow certain guidelines, they should be
advertise somewhere imo (like stackoverflow does)
In the footer that's included in every post including this one, there's
a link to the Mailing List Guidelines. Go to
On 02/20/2016 03:00 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
First of all i'm not a kid, i'm 28 years old thank you.
Second, i'm not your friend or your kid or whathever, stop talking to me
like i am, know your place and stick with it.
...and I'm 66, so to me, you're still a kid. I know my place, and I
don't
2016-02-20 23:51 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff :
> Gmail sets up the reply for top posting, but there's nothing in the world
> stopping you from moving the cursor down to the bottom where it belongs, or
> from trimming extraneous text from what you quote. (Again, I commend you
> for knowing
On 02/20/2016 03:54 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
2016-02-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 jd1008 >:
You cannot set the number of the patch in the spec file to match
some other spec
file. If you do, then you need to re-number all the other patch
files
2016-02-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 jd1008 :
> You cannot set the number of the patch in the spec file to match some
> other spec
> file. If you do, then you need to re-number all the other patch files in
> mentioned
> in the spec file. Setting the number for the patch you want, you will
On 02/20/2016 02:27 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
I presume you use facebook & linked-in - they are good examples of why these
mailing lists are sailing against a head-wind.
You presume wrong. I've never used the tome of farces, I'm not linked
in and I've never visited Twitter. I have no use for
On 02/20/2016 02:23 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
I personnaly NEVER quoted anyone in a mail before, and i'm using mails
since 2005.
I wouldn't be bragging about that if I were you. I was doing telephone
tech support for an ISP back in '96, and nobody, including the suits was
top posting back
On 02/20/2016 03:21 PM, Ntlworld wrote:
Don't let it get you down noah - these mailing lists are antiquated -
people get very religious about top-posting vs bottom-posting
On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:08, thibaut noah > wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:14, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> On 02/20/2016 02:08 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
>>
>> Okay, i googled what top posting is.
>> I did not to post, i just never quote what i'm replying too since text
>> is not quoted when one press the answer button on gmail.
>> What's
On 02/20/2016 02:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're
talking about :/
Patch is say to work on 4.1.3
The thing is there is actually no patch that i know about for current
kernel, i expect it to work because i checked it with
2016-02-20 23:14 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff :
> When I reply to something from gmail, the entire message is quoted, but I
> trim it to what's relevant. Sometimes, I cut the quoted text into sections
> with replies in between to make it clear just what I'm responding to. It's
> not exactly
Don't let it get you down noah - these mailing lists are antiquated - people
get very religious about top-posting vs bottom-posting
> On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:08, thibaut noah wrote:
>
>
> 2016-02-20 22:52 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff :
>>> On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM,
On 02/20/2016 02:08 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
Okay, i googled what top posting is.
I did not to post, i just never quote what i'm replying too since text
is not quoted when one press the answer button on gmail.
What's the point of quoting everything when you just have to read the
previous message
2016-02-20 22:52 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff :
> On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
>
>> I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're
>> talking about :/
>>
>
> I have a gmail account, although I'm not using it for this list. Gmail is
> set to assume top
On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're
talking about :/
I have a gmail account, although I'm not using it for this list. Gmail
is set to assume top posting, but somehow, none of my replies go out top
posted. Think
I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're
talking about :/
Patch is say to work on 4.1.3
The thing is there is actually no patch that i know about for current
kernel, i expect it to work because i checked it with upstream source
earlier and it was working.
Methods
On 02/20/2016 02:20 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
yumdownloader --source kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
I use fedora 23 and the kernel 4.2.3-300
I got the patch from here :
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/
A modify version which is the most recent
yumdownloader --source kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64
I use fedora 23 and the kernel 4.2.3-300
I got the patch from here :
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/
A modify version which is the most recent version of this patch i could
find.
I just want to
On 02/20/2016 02:04 PM, thibaut noah wrote:
Following my kernel compilation issue i used another method to get the
source.
I added :
# custom patch for acs override support
Patch: override_for_missing_acs_capabilities.patch
in my kernel.spec
The patch is in rpmbuild/SOURCES but when i
Following my kernel compilation issue i used another method to get the
source.
I added :
# custom patch for acs override support
Patch: override_for_missing_acs_capabilities.patch
in my kernel.spec
The patch is in rpmbuild/SOURCES but when i run the build it says the file
is missing.
Also to
30 matches
Mail list logo