Terry L. Triplett wrote:
> Your comment seems to directly contradict what Larry Rosen said in the
> article.
Yes my mistake :)
- Sylvain
___
users mailing list
users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
My original comments were a little tongue-in-cheek. I got a kick out of the
"wording" of the license. Objectively, I would have to agree with your
thoughts about whether or not the license would hold up, at least in an
American court.
I would have to say that either an MIT or BSD license would p
Your comment seems to directly contradict what Larry Rosen said in the article. The article discusses how "give it away to the public domain" statements aren't licenses (and perhaps even legally risky to the donor), then ends with the following recommendation:
"If you want to give away software
fo
> I am not saying Seo's choice of license was a bad one, but I don't know
> if it has a value by itself that's all. The question is not to please
> people but to convey the correct rights as well as the responsability
> you take as the provide for the piece of software. The MIT license is as
> eas
