Am 10.01.2018 um 16:55 schrieb Jeff Squyres (jsquyres):
> See https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tuning#setting-mca-params for a
> little more info on how to set MCA params.
Thanks!
> In terms of physical vs. logical -- are you talking about hyperthreading?
Yes.
> If so, Open MPI uses the
Vahid --
Were you able to give it a whirl?
Thanks.
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 7:58 PM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>
> Gilles,
>
> I will try the 3.0.1rc1 version to see how it goes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vahid
>
>> On Jan 5, 2018, at 8:40 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
>> wrote:
>>
>> Vahid,
>>
>> This loo
Hi Jeff,
I looked for the 3.0.1 version but I only found the 3.0.0 version available for
download. So I thought it may take a while for the 3.0.1 to become available.
Or did I miss something?
Thanks,
Vahid
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
> Vahid --
>
> W
You are correct: 3.0.1 has not been released yet.
However, our nightly snapshots of the 3.0.x branch are available for download.
These are not official releases, but they are great for getting users to test
what will eventually become an official release (i.e., 3.0.1) to see if
particular bugs
Great. I will try the 3.0.x version to see how it goes.
On a side note, I did manage to run EPW without getting memory leaks using
openmpi-1.8.8 and gcc-4.8.5. These are the tools that apparently worked when
the code was developed as seen on their Test Farm
(http://epw.org.uk/Main/TestFarm).
T