) O'Bryant,Jr.
> Business Line Infrastructure
> Technical Systems, HPC
> Office: 713-431-7022
>
>
>
>
>
> "Caird, Andrew
>
> J"
>
oops, I meant -mca, not -mcs
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Caird, Andrew J
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:57 AM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Cc: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> Subject: Re
Does OMPI built with TM but run with:
-mcs pls ^tm
give the same effect?
--andy
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
> pat.o'bry...@exxonmobil.com
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:47 AM
> To: Open MPI Users
Dr. Yu sent me a version of this intended for OpenMPI back in September.
I was just today getting around to trying it, although I noticed that it
doesn't work with R v2.6, so my plans just changed a little.
If Dr. Yu gives permission, I'll send to you what he sent to me, or
perhaps he'll post it
And in case you think that Scott might be just trying to sell more Cisco
HCAs :) I'll be an independant voice stating that they do, indeed, work.
And they work quite well and without any real effort to get it going.
Thanks to both Cisco and the OpenMPI crew (and the overlap between the
two) for ma
Glenn,
If you're careful with $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH you can certainly do
this. One thing that makes this a little easier is the 'modules'
package (http://modules.sourceforge.net/). We use this to maintain 9
versions of OpenMPI for various reasons, along with 5 versions of LAM
and a version
Massimiliano,
It should work automatically, but I have seen instances where switches
or Ethernet cards can't support the full 9000 bytes per frame, and we've
had to go as low as 6000 bytes to get consistent performance. It seems
like everyone's interpretation of what the 9000 bytes is for is a li
t;
> section of NEWS:
>
> http://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/ompi/trunk/NEWS
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> > [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Caird, Andrew J
> > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:10 AM
Jeff,
What were the details of the problem/fixes?
Is it worth us moving to the trunk or using what we have until 1.1.1
arrives?
Thanks.
--andy
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Squyres
> (jsquyres)
> Sent
Anoop,
OpenMPI defaults to building only shared libraries; see this FAQ entry
for building static libraries:
http://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=building#static-build
Hope this helps.
--andy
> -Original Message-
> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org
Hello all,
I've read the thread "OpenMPI debugging support"
(http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2005/11/0370.php) and it
looks like there is improved debugging support for debuggers other than
TV in the 1.1 series.
I'd like to use Portland Groups pgdbg. It's a parallel debugger,
there
11 matches
Mail list logo
