Thank you Jeff for the clarification.
Saliya
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Saliya Ekanayake wrote:
>
> > Anyway, to answer your question I was trying to do sendrecv in a chain
> where "toSend" and "receiveFrom" ranks are not th
On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Saliya Ekanayake wrote:
> Anyway, to answer your question I was trying to do sendrecv in a chain where
> "toSend" and "receiveFrom" ranks are not the same. I was using a single
> buffer, which resulted in cases where the buffer content got replaced with
> received
Hi George,
Thank you for your prompt reply, but my apologies for missing it and it's
been quite a while.
Anyway, to answer your question I was trying to do sendrecv in a chain
where "toSend" and "receiveFrom" ranks are not the same. I was using a
single buffer, which resulted in cases where the b
Why do you need an order? If you plan to send and receive on the same buffer,
you should use the MPI constructs for that, namely MPI_IN_PLACE.
George.
On Nov 27, 2013, at 07:20 , Saliya Ekanayake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just want to verify if sendrecv provides any guarantees as to which operation
Hi,
Just want to verify if sendrecv provides any guarantees as to which
operation (send or receive) happens first. I think it is not, is it?
Thank you,
Saliya
--
Saliya Ekanayake esal...@gmail.com
Cell 812-391-4914 Home 812-961-6383
http://saliya.org
