Sorry for my silence on that, I was out for a couple of days. I have a
patch that made ompio work for Mohamads test, he is testing it now on
his own/additional test cases, and I'll commit it (and file a CMR) as
soon as we have feedback on that.
Thanks
Edgar
On 8/12/2014 10:30 AM, Jeff Squyres
I filed https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4856 to apply these ROMIO
patches.
Probably won't happen until 1.8.3.
On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Rob Latham wrote:
>
>
> On 08/06/2014 11:50 AM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
>
>> To replicate, run the program with 2 or more procs:
>>
>> mpirun
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rob Latham wrote:
>
>
> On 08/11/2014 08:54 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
>> The patch related to ticket #4597 is zapping only the datatypes where
>> the user explicitly provided a zero count.
>>
>> We can argue about LB and UB, but I have a hard time understanding
On 08/11/2014 08:54 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
The patch related to ticket #4597 is zapping only the datatypes where
the user explicitly provided a zero count.
We can argue about LB and UB, but I have a hard time understanding the
rationale of allowing zero count only for LB and UB. If it is re
The patch related to ticket #4597 is zapping only the datatypes where the
user explicitly provided a zero count.
We can argue about LB and UB, but I have a hard time understanding the
rationale of allowing zero count only for LB and UB. If it is required by
the standard we can easily support it (t
On 08/10/2014 07:32 PM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
Update:
George suggested that I try with the 1.8.2 rc3 and that one resolves the
hindexed_block segfault that I was seeing with ompi. the I/O part now
works with ompio, but needs the patches from Rob in ROMIO to work correctly.
The 2nd issue wit
Update:
George suggested that I try with the 1.8.2 rc3 and that one resolves the
hindexed_block segfault that I was seeing with ompi. the I/O part now
works with ompio, but needs the patches from Rob in ROMIO to work correctly.
The 2nd issue with collective I/O where some processes participat
On 08/06/2014 11:50 AM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
To replicate, run the program with 2 or more procs:
mpirun -np 2 ./hindexed_io mpi_test_file
[jam:15566] *** Process received signal ***
[jam:15566] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[jam:15566] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[jam:15566] Fai
Hi Rob,
On 8/6/2014 1:32 PM, Rob Latham wrote:
On 08/06/2014 11:50 AM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
If I use mpich 3.1.2 , I don't see those issues.
What Mohamad forgot to tell you is that he doesn't see those issues
because I patched them on monday.
If I understood right, your patch was to
On 08/06/2014 11:50 AM, Mohamad Chaarawi wrote:
If I use mpich 3.1.2 , I don't see those issues.
What Mohamad forgot to tell you is that he doesn't see those issues
because I patched them on monday.
ROMIO has some HINDEXED_BLOCK fixes that OMPI should pick up on the next
romio resync. Y
10 matches
Mail list logo