[OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows - policy

2013-06-24 Thread Mathieu Gontier
in Windows installers, Cygwin support does not really match with my expectations and constraints. Thanks a lot, Mathieu. -- Mathieu Gontier - MSN: mathieu.gont...@gmail.com - Skype: mathieu_gontier

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows - policy

2013-06-25 Thread Mathieu Gontier
24, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Ralph Castain <rhc.open...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Our windows supporter has left to greener pastures. Long term, we may > have an org that will want to support it. However, for now support has been > dropped in 1.7. > > > > Sent from my iPhon

[OMPI users] difference between single and double precision

2010-12-03 Thread Mathieu Gontier
. Is it the accentuation of the OpenMPI+Ethernet loss of performance, is it another issue into OpenMPI or is there any option a can use? Thank you for your help. Mathieu. -- Mathieu Gontier

Re: [OMPI users] difference between single and double precision

2010-12-06 Thread Mathieu Gontier
/ is there a difference between --mca btl tcp,sm,self and --mca btl self,sm,tcp (or not put any explicit mca option)? Best regards, Mathieu. On 12/05/2010 06:10 PM, Eugene Loh wrote: Mathieu Gontier wrote: Dear OpenMPI users I am dealing with an arithmetic problem. In fact, I have two variants

Re: [OMPI users] difference between single and double precision

2010-12-16 Thread Mathieu Gontier
. Any idea? On 12/06/2010 04:31 PM, Eugene Loh wrote: Mathieu Gontier wrote: Nevertheless, one can observed some differences between MPICH and OpenMPI from 25% to 100% depending on the options we are using into our software. Tests are lead on a single SGI node on 6 or 12 processes, and thus

Re: [OMPI users] difference between single and double precision

2010-12-16 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Does the env. var. works to overload it: export OMPI_MCA_btl_sm_eager_limit=40960 In that case, I can deal with it. On 12/16/2010 11:14 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: Hi all, We have lead some tests and the option btl_sm_eager_limit has a positive consequence on the performance. Eugene, thank

Re: [OMPI users] difference between single and double precision

2010-12-20 Thread Mathieu Gontier
to all of you for the help. Best regards, Mathieu. On 12/16/2010 06:21 PM, Eugene Loh wrote: Jeff Squyres wrote: On Dec 16, 2010, at 5:14 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: We have lead some tests and the option btl_sm_eager_limit has a positive consequence on the performance. Eugene, thank you

[OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.2] Infiniband issue on smoky @ ornl

2011-06-22 Thread Mathieu Gontier
for us, but I do not want to ask to install to many of them. Thanks. -- / Mathieu Gontier skype: mathieu_gontier /

Re: [OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.2] Infiniband issue on smoky @ ornl

2011-06-23 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Compilers: pathscale/3.2.99 pathscale/3.2 pgi/10.9 pgi/10.4 intel/11.1.072 gcc/4.4.4 gcc/4.4.3 --- Let me know if that helps. Josh On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Mathieu Gontier <mathieu.g

Re: [OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.2] Infiniband issue on smoky @ ornl

2011-06-23 Thread Mathieu Gontier
23, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: Hello, Thank for the answer. I am testing with OpenMPI-1.4.3: my computation is queuing. But I did not read anything obvious related to my issue. Have you read something which could solve it? I am going to submit my computation with --mca

Re: [OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.2] Infiniband issue on smoky @ ornl

2011-06-23 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Dear all, Thanks a lot for your support. I only had time to test one today, but it seems the option --mca mpi_leave_pinned 0 works on my case. I will go further next week, but for the moment, I can submit my computation. Thanks a lot for your help. On 06/23/2011 03:56 PM, Mathieu Gontier

[OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows when MPI_F77 is used from a C application

2012-10-26 Thread Mathieu Gontier
against libmpi_f77.lib? Thanks for your help. Mathieu. -- Mathieu Gontier - MSN: mathieu.gont...@gmail.com - Skype: mathieu_gontier

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows when MPI_F77 is used from a C application

2012-10-29 Thread Mathieu Gontier
an what you > need to compile it cleanly (so no /O flags) and see if it crashes. > > Damien > > > On 26/10/2012 10:27 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am willing to use OpenMPI on Windows for a CFD instead of MPICH2. My > solver is developed if Fortran7

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows when MPI_F77 is used from a C application

2012-10-29 Thread Mathieu Gontier
, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Mathieu Gontier <mathieu.gont...@gmail.com>wrote: > I crashes into the fortran routine calling a MPI functions. When I run the > debugger, the crash seems to be in libmpi_f77.lib, but I cannot go further > since the lib is not in debbug mode. > > A

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows when MPI_F77 is used from a C application

2012-10-30 Thread Mathieu Gontier
, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Damien <dam...@khubla.com> wrote: > Is there a series of error messages or anything at all that you can post > here? > > Damien > > > On 29/10/2012 2:30 PM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: > > Hi guys. > > Finally, I compiled with /O: the options is

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI on Windows when MPI_F77 is used from a C application

2012-10-31 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Damien > > > > On 30/10/2012 1:43 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: > >> Hi Damien, > >> > >> The only message I have is: > >> [vs2010:09300] [[56007,0],0]-[[56007,1],0] mca_oob_tcp_msg_recv: readv > failed: Unknown error (108) > >> [vs2010:0930

[OMPI users] OpenMPI less fast than MPICH

2010-01-11 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Hi all I want to migrate my CFD application from MPICH-1.2.4 (ch_p4 device) to OpenMPI-1.4. Hence, I compared the two libraries compiled with my application and I noted OpenMPI is less efficient thant MPICH on ethernet (170min with MPICH against 200min with OpenMPI). So, I wonder if someone

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI less fast than MPICH

2010-01-14 Thread Mathieu Gontier
lot of printing to stdout/stderr? On Jan 11, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: Hi all I want to migrate my CFD application from MPICH-1.2.4 (ch_p4 device) to OpenMPI-1.4. Hence, I compared the two libraries compiled with my application and I noted OpenMPI is less effici

[OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.1] compiling without openib, running with openib + ompi141 and gcc3

2010-01-25 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Hello, I built OpenMPI-1.4.1 without openib support with the following configuration options: ./configure --prefix=/develop/libs/OpenMPI/openmpi-1.4.1/LINUX_GCC_4_1_tcp_mach --enable-static --enable-shared --enable-cxx-exceptions --enable-mpi-f77 --disable-mpi-f90 --enable-mpi-cxx

Re: [OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.1] compiling without openib, running with openib + ompi141 and gcc3

2010-01-26 Thread Mathieu Gontier
ff: the previous answers were really useful. Jeff Squyres wrote: On Jan 25, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: I built OpenMPI-1.4.1 without openib support with the following configuration options: ./configure --prefix=/develop/libs/OpenMPI/openmpi-1.4.1/LINUX_GCC_4_1_tcp_

Re: [OMPI users] [ompi-1.4.1] compiling without openib, running with openib + ompi141 and gcc3

2010-02-01 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Squyres wrote: On Jan 26, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Mathieu Gontier wrote: 1/ I rebuilt without --enable-dist (more secured indeed) and with explicit --without-openib/--with-openib : behaviors are better. Great. Excellent. I didn't mention it in my prior email, but our configure

[OMPI users] random MPI_UNIVERSE_SIZE

2010-02-18 Thread Mathieu Gontier
Hello, I am trying to use MPI_Comm_spawn (MPI-2 standard only) and I have an problem when I use MPI_UNIVERSE_SIZE. Here my code: int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) { int wsize=0, wrank=-1 ; int usize=0, urank=-1 ; int ier ; int usize_attr=0, flag=0 ; MPI_Comm MPI_COMM_UNIVERSE;

Re: [OMPI users] random MPI_UNIVERSE_SIZE and inter-commicator created by MPI_Comm_spawn

2010-02-18 Thread Mathieu Gontier
my MPI_COMM_UNIVERSE be a higher communicator including here the group of MPI_COMM_SELF and the group of MPI_COMM_WORLD of my spawned application (./worker). I think I missed something. Does someone can help me? Thank you. Mathieu Gontier wrote: Hello, I am trying to use MPI_Comm_spawn (MPI

Re: [OMPI users] random MPI_UNIVERSE_SIZE and inter-commicator created by MPI_Comm_spawn

2010-02-19 Thread Mathieu Gontier
. The MPI_UNIVERSE_SIZE is not set in Open MPI. george. On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:18 , Mathieu Gontier wrote: Another question on the same example. When I ask the size on the inter-communitator (MPI_COMM_UNIVERSE in the example) between the spaner/parent and the spawned/children processes